|















| |
INDEX
PREVIOUS
NEXT
|
COLLECTIONS
Commentaries,
Word Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Isaiah
1:2
Listen, O
heavens, and
hear, O
earth; For the
LORD
speaks,
"Sons I have
reared and
brought up, But
they have
revolted
against Me. (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
English Translation of
the Greek (Septuagint):
Hear, O heaven, and hearken, O earth: for the Lord has spoken, saying,
I have begotten and reared up children, but they have rebelled against
me.
Amplified: Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth! For the
Lord has spoken: I have nourished and brought up sons and have made
them great and exalted, but they have rebelled against Me and broken
away from Me.
(Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
KJV: Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth: for the LORD hath
spoken, I have nourished and brought up children, and they have
rebelled against me.
NET: Listen, O heavens, pay attention, O earth! For
the LORD speaks: "I raised children, I brought them up, but they have
rebelled against me!
(NET
Bible)
NJB: Listen, you heavens; earth, attend, for Yahweh is
speaking, ‘I have reared children and brought them up, but they have
rebelled against me. (NJB)
NLT: Hear, O heavens! Listen, O earth! This is what the
LORD says: "The children I raised and cared for have turned against
me. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth,
For Jehovah hath spoken: Sons I have nourished and brought up, And
they -- they transgressed against Me. |
|
|
|
|
Listen, O heavens, and
hear, O earth: (Dt 4:26; 30:19; 32:1; Ps 50:4; Jer 2:12;
6:19; 22:29; Ezek 36:4; Mic 1:2; 6:1,2)
JEHOVAH'S
INDICTMENT OF
JUDAH & JERUSALEM
Listen...hear
- Both are commands. God Himself is speaking and he want to be taken
seriously! God presents His indictment against Judah and Jerusalem...
Webster defines
indictment as..
2 : a formal written statement
framed by a prosecuting authority and found by a jury (as a grand
jury) charging a person with an offense
3 : an expression of strong disapproval 〈an indictment of
contemporary morality〉(1996, c1993 Edition)
1. A written accusation or formal
charge of a crime or misdemeanor, preferred by a grand jury under oath
to a court. Blackstone.
2. The paper or parchment containing the accusation of a grand jury.
(1828 Edition)
Barnes comments that...
This is properly the beginning
of the prophecy. It is a sublime commencement; and is of a highly
poetic character. The heavens and the earth are summoned
to bear witness to the apostasy, ingratitude, and deep depravity of
the chosen people of God (Ex 6:7, 19:6, Dt 7:6, Lv 11:44). The address
is expressive of deep feeling — the bursting forth of a heart filled
with amazement at a wonderful and unusual event. (Barnes' Notes on the
Old Testament - Volume VII) (Bolding added)
The prophet Hosea (who
prophesied primarily to the Northern Kingdom - the 10 tribes ["Israel"
= "Ephraim"] and was a contemporary of Isaiah who was prophesying to
the Southern Kingdom of Judah) had a similar indictment against
Israel (10 Northern tribes)...
Listen
(not a suggestion but a command! -
verbs in
red
on this website
virtually always identify a
command or the
imperative mood in either Hebrew or Greek [imperative
mood in Greek])
to the word of the Lord, O sons of Israel, for the Lord has a case
against the inhabitants of the land, (Why?
What is is the Lord's "evidence" in His case against Israel?)
because there is no faithfulness or kindness or
knowledge of God (knowledge here is not just "head" knowledge but
a knowing of God in one's heart [experiential knowledge of God] which
awakens in our heart a love that is motivated to obey God [cp Jn
14:15, 21] and live righteously) in the land. 2 There is swearing,
deception, murder, stealing and adultery. They employ violence, so
that bloodshed follows bloodshed (cp Isa 1:15b). 3 Therefore the land
mourns, and everyone who lives in it languishes (Who
languishes? Think of America's rejection of God in prayer and Bible
reading in schools, removal of His name where it is in any form
associated with government at the city, state or national level [even
taking "In God We Trust" from coins! Just Google "remove in God we
trust from currency"], removing Christ from _____mas, ignoring
God's teaching on the sanctity of life, etc! Woe! Who languishes?
Everyone!) along with
the beasts of the field and the birds of the sky, and also the fish of
the sea disappear. 4 Yet let no one find fault, and let none offer
reproof; for your people are like those who contend with the priest. 5
So you will stumble by day, and the prophet also will stumble with you
by night; and I will destroy your mother. 6 My people are destroyed
for lack of knowledge. Because you have rejected
knowledge, I also will reject you from being My priest. Since you
have forgotten the law of your God, I also will forget your children.
(NET version of verse 6 = You have destroyed My people by failing
to acknowledge Me! Because you refuse to acknowledge Me, I will reject
you as My priests. Because you reject the law of your God, I will
reject your descendants.) (Ho 4:1-6)
Comment: To know God and
experience Him in the way Hosea describes was the greatest blessing
any ancient Jew could have desired to receive. And yet what a tragedy
that they turned from the knowledge of the Holy One of Israel and
sought to “know” the unholy idols of the pagans, a sin of
unfaithfulness to God which is hard for us to imagine today. Indeed
they were guilty of blatant spiritual harlotry (cp Isa 1:21).
We are right to be
appalled and yet do we not see the same exchange of "gods" by so many
today who claim to know God? Do we not see lack of faithfulness,
kindness, knowledge of God, swearing, deception, murder, stealing and
adultery in many who call themselves Christians.
As one Bible dictionary
explains
In modern times the name
Christian has been somewhat emptied of its true meaning as a
follower of Christ. To some today, Christian means little more than a
European or American who is not Jewish, while others have sought to
make its proper use the name of a particular denomination. However,
its original meaning is a noble one, of which any follower of Christ
can rightly be proud. (Youngblood, R. F., Bruce, F. F., Harrison, R.
K., & Thomas Nelson Publishers. Nelson's new illustrated Bible
dictionary)
Listen
(08085)
(shama') is one of the most frequent Hebrew verbs in the OT
(over 1000 uses) and can mean simply to hear or perceive a message. In
many contexts shama' conveys the sense of hearing with
reverence, attention and/or obedient assent (eg, shama' is translated
"obeyed" in Ge 22:18, cp Dt 18:19, Jdg 2:20). The idea is to give
one's undivided attention as one listens. This is especially important
when the speaker is the living God!
Do you "speed" through your
reading of the Word in the morning or do your really listen?!
In the original Hebrew shama' is in the imperative mood as also
in
the
Septuagint (LXX)
(present
imperative)
where the present tense signifies a command to continually listen,
implying that listening is their (and our) continual need, for
fallen flesh
is ever prone to
wander. Judah and Jerusalem were wandering spiritually as the Lord's
indictment goes on to explain in general terms (revolt).
Stop for a moment and try to
imagine how Isaiah's audience must have felt as they heard the Lord's
righteous indictment piercing through their facade of self-deception,
self-rationalization and self-justifying religiosity. Let all who read
Isaiah's powerful pronunciation against Judah do so with trembling
hearts that it might expose the residual corruption in each of our own
hearts (cp Jer 17:9, Ps
139:23, 24, He 4:12-note,
He 4:13-note,
Jn 16:8)
As Harry Ironside writes...
ABRUPTLY the voice of the Lord
breaks in upon the ears of men who prided themselves upon their
religiousness and trusted in their formal observance of the legal
ritual. There is something sublime in the very simplicity of this
challenge to obedience. Heaven and earth, ever subject to His will,
are called to witness the base ingratitude of the Lord's people. The
objects of His solicitous (full of concern, meticulously careful, full
of desire) care from their childhood in Egypt (cp Ex 19:4, Dt 4:33,
34, 35, 36) to the
moment then present, they had never, as an entire nation, given Him
that loving obedience which was His due. Individual faithfulness there
ever was (Ed: i.e., there was always a believing
remnant);
but nationally, as later in the case of the Church viewed as a
collective body, failure had come in almost at the very beginning (cp
Ex 32:1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7, esp Ex 32:8) and
there had never been recovery. (Expository Notes on
the Prophet Isaiah)
HEAVEN & EARTH
CALLED AS WITNESSES
Heavens...earth - J
Vernon McGee
writes "This is God’s general judgment against Judah. He is calling
the world, if you please, to come into the courtroom and listen to the
proceedings as He tries His people. God does not do anything in a
corner or in the dark." (Mp3's
on Isa 1:1-2 ;
Isa 1:3 ;
Isa 1:4)
The Creator frequently
summons His creation (heaven...earth) to the "witness stand" or the "jury box" in the Old
Testament...
Deuteronomy 4:26 I call heaven
and earth to witness against you today, that you shall
surely perish quickly from the land where you are going over the
Jordan to possess it. You shall not live long on it, but shall be
utterly destroyed. (Comment: In this context, the heavens and
the earth witness to an oath.)
Deuteronomy 30:19 "I call heaven
and earth to witness against you today, that I have set
before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life
in order that you may live, you and your descendants,
Deuteronomy 32:1 "Give ear, O
heavens, and let me speak; And let the earth hear the words
of my mouth. (McGee: When God put the nation Israel in the land,
having taken them out of the land of Egypt, He put down the conditions
on which He was “homesteading” them in the Promised Land. He called
the created intelligences of heaven and earth to witness these
conditions.)
Psalm 50:4 He summons the
heavens above, and the earth, to judge His people
Spurgeon comments: Angels
and men, the upper and the lower worlds, are called to witness the
solemn scene. The whole creation shall stand in court to testify to
the solemnity and the truth of the divine pleading. Both earth beneath
and heaven above shall unite in condemning sin; the guilty shall have
no appeal, though all are summoned that they may appeal if they dare.
Both angels and men have seen the guilt of mankind and the goodness of
the Lord, they shall therefore confess the justice of the divine
utterance, and say "Amen" to the sentence of the supreme Judge. Alas,
ye despisers! What will ye do and to whom will ye fly?
(John Trapp) That these dumb
creatures may be as so many speaking evidences against an unworthy
people, and witness of God's righteous dealings against them.
Jeremiah 2:12 “Be
appalled, O heavens, at
this, and shudder,
be very desolate,”
declares the Lord.
Jeremiah 6:19 “Hear,
O earth: behold, I am bringing disaster on this people, the fruit of
their plans, because they have not listened to My words, and as for My
law, they have rejected it also.
Jeremiah 22:29 “O land,
land, land, Hear
the word of the Lord!
Micah 1:2
Hear,
O peoples, all of you; Listen, O earth and all it contains, and let
the Lord God be a witness against you, the Lord from His holy temple.
Micah 6:1, 2
Hear
(not a suggestion but a command! -
verbs in
red
on this website
virtually always identify a
command or the
imperative mood in either Hebrew or Greek [imperative
mood in Greek])
now what the LORD is saying, "Arise,
plead
(Heb rub = to conduct a lawsuit or legal case and all that it
involves, cp use of contend in Isa 3:13 and the merciful use in
Isa 57:16) your case before the mountains, and let the hills hear your
voice. "Listen,
you mountains, to the indictment (Heb = rib, riyb = primarily
means a quarrel or dispute between 2 parties, often with a focus on
the feelings between the parties, cp over land rights in Ge 13:7, a
controversy with sinners Je 25:31, a legal dispute or lawsuit - Ex
23:2, 1Sa 24:16) of the LORD, and you enduring foundations of the
earth, because the LORD has a case against His people; even with
Israel He will dispute. (Lxx = dielegcho = to argue a case,
engage in a dispute, refute utterly).
Spurgeon adds that...
Heaven and earth might well
be called to witness such strange ingratitude as this of which the
Lord had to complain. It is an appeal of God to inanimate creation to
bear witness to the ingratitude that He had received, as if it was of
no use any longer to speak to men. The appeal is stated very solemnly
and impressively “Hear, O heavens, and give ear, O earth for the
Lord hath spoken. I have nourished and brought up children,”
cared for them, loved them, fed them, “and they have rebelled
against me.” The ingratitude of a child is something shocking;
and the ingratitude of man to God is of that character. (Exposition of
Isaiah 1)
A B Simpson writes
that...
The first chapter of Isaiah was
probably the first of the prophet's public messages, and it is a good
sample of many others. It may be described generally as a message
concerning sin and salvation. Its form is most dramatic. Suddenly
appearing in the temple court or the public square, with impressive
gestures he calls the attention of the multitude by repeating the very
words with which Moses had begun his last message to Israel. "Hear, oh
heavens," he cries, "and give ear, oh earth, for the Lord has spoken."
Then he arraigns the nation before
the bar of heaven and calls as his witnesses the heavens and the earth
and the very dumb brutes of the lower order of creation (Isa 1:3),
whose fidelity to their masters is a silent reproof to the
disobedience of God's people. Then follows the arraignment of the
sinful nation as he proceeds to characterize the unnaturalness,
ingratitude and fearful wickedness of the people, declaring at last
that their wickedness has almost brought them to the condition of
Sodom and Gomorrah (Isa 1:9).
Then there seems to have come some voice of protest or defence from
some one in the multitude, calling attention to their costly worship
and offerings as a proof of their loyalty to God (Isa 1:10). But this
only calls forth a more vehement denunciation of their wickedness, and
the prophet proceeds to tell them that the very worst thing about them
is their religion, inasmuch as it is a cloak of hypocrisy to cover
their sins, and that their prayers and sacrifices are not only
rejected (Isa 1:11, 12, 13, 14, 15a), but are an abomination to God so
long as their hearts are corrupt and their "hands are full of blood."
(Isa 1:15b)
At last the voice of denunciation is changed to one of mercy (Isa
1:16, 17, 18). The loving heart of God seems to grow weary of reproof
and longs to pour itself out in mercy and compassion. One is reminded
of the time when the Lord Jesus Himself on earth had upbraided the
cities of Galilee for rejecting His message and had begun to say to
them, "It shall be more tolerable for Tyre and Sidon at the day of
judgment than for you. And you, Capernaum, which are exalted unto
heaven, shall be brought down to hell; for if the mighty works which
had been done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained
until this day. But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable
for the land of Sodom in the day of judgment than for you." (Mt 11:22,
23, 24) But at that moment the Master's heart seemed unable longer to
endure the pain of His own reproof, and suddenly He breaks out into an
appeal of unspeakable tenderness as perhaps He sees in the multitude
before Him some weeping face or penitent heart. "Come unto Me," He
cries, "all you that labor and are heavy laden and I will give you
rest." (Mt 11:28, 29, 30).
There is a similar revulsion of feeling a little later in His
ministry, when after He had pronounced upon the Pharisees the fearful
woes of the twenty-third chapter of Matthew, He suddenly pauses again
and breaks out with an appeal of divine compassion, "Oh, Jerusalem,
Jerusalem, you that kill the prophets and stone them that are sent
unto you, how often would I have gathered you together, even as a hen
gathers her brood under her wings, and you would not." (Mt 23:37, cp
Lk 13:34).
Such a change comes over the prophet's message here. Suddenly his
denunciations close, and turning to the people with tones of
tenderness he cries, "Come now and let us end our reasoning; though
your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they
be red like crimson, they shall be as wool; if you be willing and
obedient you shall eat the good of the land, but if you refuse and
revolt, you shall be devoured with the sword, for the mouth of the
Lord has spoken it." (Isa 1:18, 19) (Christ in the Bible - Isaiah)
Spurgeon observes that...
It is not the heathen nor strangers
that the Lord here upbraids, but His own highly-favored people, his
lovingly-nurtured children, in sin was doubly sinful.
MacDonald writes that...
The whole universe is summoned to
attend a trial with God as the Judge, and with Judah and Jerusalem as
defendants. The indictment charges the people with being
intractible sons who have rebelled against God and fail to show the
natural gratitude and devotion that could be expected of a domestic
animal!
(MacDonald,
W & Farstad, A. Believer's Bible Commentary: Thomas Nelson or
Logos)
Gingrich introduces this
section noting that...
Chapter one presents Isaiah’s
introductory prophecy...It contains all of the major themes elaborated
in the remainder of the book: (1) a denunciation of sins; (2) a
warning of judgment; (3) a call to repentance; and (4) a promise of
ultimate restoration and blessing. (Gingrich, R. E. The Book of
Isaiah. Memphis, TN.: Riverside Printing)
Ewald called this first
chapter "the great Arraignment"; and that certainly is an apt
description.
Peter Grainger introduces
his message on Isaiah 1 this way...
The scene is a courtroom. The
universe is called to attend, the Judge is the Lord, and His people
are in the dock. The charges are very serious, a deadly cocktail of
outright rebellion and outward religion. (Morgan, R. J.. Nelson's
Annual Peacher's Sourcebook : 2004 Edition. Nashville, TN: Thomas
Nelson Publishers)
JEHOVAH LAYS OUT
THE CHARGES
For the LORD speaks:
(Isa 16:14, Jer 10:1, Jer 13:15; Amos 3:1; Mic 3:8; Acts 4:20)
The psalmist gives us wise
words...
Let all the earth fear the LORD.
Let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of Him. (Why?) For
He spoke, and it was done. He commanded, and it stood fast (He 11:3-note).
(Ps 33:8,9)
Spurgeon: Creation was the
fruit of a word (Jn 1:1, 2, 3). Jehovah said, "Light be," and light
was (Ge 1:3). The Lord's acts are sublime in their ease and
instantaneousness. "What a word is this?" This was the wondering
enquiry of old, and it may be ours to this day. He commanded, and it
stood fast. Out of nothing creation stood forth, and was confirmed in
existence. The same power which first uplifted, now makes the universe
to abide (He 1:3-note,
"in Him" = in Christ = Col 1:17-note);
although we may not observe it, there is as great a display of sublime
power in confirming as in creating. Happy is the man who has learned
to lean his all upon the sure word of Him who built the skies! (Ed:
When He speaks, let us listen!)
For - Explains why they
were to listen
listen. Why listen? It's not E F Hutton, but Jehovah Himself!
Yes, Isaiah says Jehovah speaks but remember that from Genesis
1:1 to Revelation 22:21, Jehovah is speaking to men, ever calling His
rebellious creation to be redeemed and to return to Him!
LORD (03068)
(Yhwh = YeHoWaH = Yahweh = Jehovah) (see study on
Jehovah)
is always identified in the NAS (not NIV, ESV, NLT) by being in all
caps. Jehovah is derived from hayah a verb which means to
exist, to be, to become and at its core denotes "being" or the
fountain head of being, which ultimately can be applied only to the
one true and living God, the ultimate "Cause" of all other "being." In
Exodus 3:14 we read God's own "definition" of Himself as "I Am (hayah)
that I Am (hayah)". Recall that Jehovah is frequently combined with
other names, even Isaiah's name which means "the salvation of Yahweh".
The Jews never pronounced this name, not even in reading their own
Scriptures. So sacred did they deem it, that when it occurred in their
books, instead of the word Yahweh, they substituted the word Adonai (0136),
a masculine noun which is used some 459 times in Scripture only as a name
for God.
Jehovah speaks - Don't go by this phrase too
quickly. To be sure Isaiah penned the words originally (cp 2Pe 1:20, 21-note), but
ultimately these are God's very own supernatural words. Yes, they seem
to appear as only black print on white pages, but they are unlike any
other book and are infinitely superior to the sum total of all
the other greatest masterpieces ever penned by mortal men! When
God speaks, all other words pale in comparison!
The indictment that follows is from the great "I Am" Himself.
These are His words and as the writer of Hebrews reminds us (also in
the
context of a strong warning to the predominantly Jewish readers to enter His rest
[He 4:1-note]
found ultimately in their crucified and now risen Messiah)...
The word of God is living and
active and sharper than any two-edged sword, and piercing as far as
the division of soul and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able
to judge the thoughts and intentions of the heart. And there is no
creature hidden from His sight, but all things are open and laid bare
to the eyes of Him with whom we have to do ("we must give account" He
4:13NIV. (He 4:12, 13-notes)
Related Resource:
Music - Word Of God Speak - MercyMe
THEIR
PRIVILEGES
Sons I have reared and
brought up: (Isa 5:1,2; Isa 46:3,4; Dt 1:31; 4:7,8; Jer
31:9; Ezek 16:6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14; 20:5-32; Ro 3:1,2;
9:4,5)
Isaiah emphasizes in
chapter 5 again that Jehovah had cared for His people Israel just as
any loving father would for his own dear children...
Let me sing now for my well-beloved
a song of my beloved concerning His vineyard (Isa 5:7). My
well-beloved had a vineyard on a fertile hill. He dug it all
around, removed its stones, and planted it with the choicest vine. And
He built a tower in the middle of it and also hewed out a wine vat in
it; Then He expected it to produce good grapes, but it produced only
worthless ones. (Isaiah 5:1, 2)
And again in chapter 46
Jehovah reaffirms His covenant (see
Abrahamic vs Mosaic
and
Abrahamic vs Old vs New Covenants)
lovingkindness and faithfulness commanding them...
Listen
to Me, O house of Jacob, and all the
remnant
of the house of
Israel, you who have been borne by Me from birth, and have been
carried from the womb (Dt 1:31), even to your old age, I shall be the
same, and even to your graying years I shall bear you! I have done it,
and I shall carry you; and I shall bear you, and I shall deliver you.
(Isa 46:3,4)
Paul in his explanation
of God's plan for the Jews (and specifically that He is NOT finished
with Israel -s see also study of the phrase
Israel of God)
in Romans 9-11 enumerates the incredible advantages Israel has always
possessed as a people group...
For I could wish that I myself were
accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my
kinsmen according to the flesh,4 who are Israelites, to whom belongs
the adoption as sons and the glory and the covenants and the giving of
the Law and the temple service and the promises,5 whose are the
fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is
over all, God blessed forever. Amen. (Ro 9:1, 2, 3-notes)
Application: Beloved, if you are a believer,
then you are a son (daughter) who Jehovah has begat (Jn 1:12, 13) by
the new birth (Jn 3:3, 4, 5, 6). Just as He did for his sons in the
OT, He has also provided us everything necessary for life and
godliness (2Pe 1:3-note).
Let us therefore be careful not to think lightly of the kindness of
our Lord (cp Ro 2:4-note).
Let us be wary, forewarned and forearmed by the sad example of Judah,
remembering that there but by the grace of God (in moment by moment
need and dependence) go each of us. Yes, we are redeemed by the blood
of the Lamb of God, but that does not change the nature of our fallen
flesh
which still indwells
us, ever lurking to trip us up and cause us to stumble and even to
forsake the Lord our God (cp Mt 26:41, Mk 14:38).
Sons - In Exodus we see
this truth about Israel's divine sonship....
Then you shall say to Pharaoh,
‘Thus says the Lord, “Israel is My son, My first-born. So
I said to you, ‘Let My son go, that he may serve Me’;
but you have refused to let him go. Behold, I will kill your son, your
first-born.”’(Ex 4:22, 23)
God had been as a Father to
Israel but in spite of His lovingkindness, they rebelled and fell away
from Him as described in Isa 1:3. Israel was His wayward son (Ex.
4:22, 23; cp. Deut. 14:1; 32:20).
Barnes writes that...
They were the adopted children of
God; and they are represented as being weak, and ignorant, and
helpless as children, when he took them under his fatherly protection
and care; Hosea 11:1 (Barnes' Notes on the Old Testament - Volume VII)
Richards notes that...
God seeks an intimate personal
relationship with His worshipers, the kind children have with a
much–loved father. No wonder Judah’s rejection of a personal
relationship repelled the Lord. (The Bible Readers Companion)
JUDAH'S
REARING & RAISING UP
Reared (01431)
(gadal) means to become great (or to make great [Piel stem]) or
to grow up (cp of hair = Nu 6:5, trees = Isa 44:14), and refers to the
natural process of a person's development as natural process of a
person’s development or a child’s growing up ("Grew" =Ge 21:8, 20; 25:27;
Ex 2:10, 11) and of sons reared ("reared"= Isa 49:21).
Gadal - All uses in
Isaiah - Isa. 1:2; 9:3; 10:15; 23:4; 28:29; 42:21; 44:14; 49:21; 51:18
One could read this sons I
have reared as
"Sons
I have made great"!
Brought up (07311)
(rum/ruwm) literally means something elevated or raised up
high, and in this context speaks of the process of persons growing up.
In the Piel stem, rum means to bring up, nourish, educate (cp
Is 23:4). These words, though applied often to the training up of
children, are used here also to denote the elevation to which Judah
and Jerusalem had been raised. He had not merely trained them up, but
he had trained them up so that they attained an elevated station, one
of special honor
The
Septuagint (LXX)
underscores their
place of honor, for the
LXX
translates rum with the Greek verb hupsoo meaning
literally to lift up or to raise high and figuratively speaks of one
who is honored and given an uplifted or exalted position (cp "exalted"
in Lk 1:52). The point is clear - Judah and Jerusalem
had been reared like children in a rich home with all the advantages
(spiritually speaking) one could possibly desire! This truth makes the
last part of this passage even more vivid and tragic! The
privileged sons had become rebellious sons!
Oh, beloved saint, child of the
living God, how we need to read and weep and be warned, for we in the
New Covenant have been blessed with every spiritual blessing in the
heavenly places in Christ Jesus (Eph 1:3-note)
and yet we all too often surrender to the will of "King
Sin" and rebel
against King Jesus (cp Ro 6:11-note,
Ro 6:12, 13, 14-note,
Ro 6:19-note)
and grieve the indwelling Spirit of Christ (cp Ep 4:30-note,
1Th 5:19-note).
Those who should be "Princes" in Christ (see study of
in Christ
and
in Christ Jesus
and
in Christ),
too often seek to be "Paupers" in the
flesh.
Let us learn from Jehovah's words of warning to rebellious Judah and
Jerusalem (1Cor 10:6, 11)!
Jeremiah also alludes to
Israel's have privileges as God's peculiar treasured (peculiar
Dt 26:18KJV) possession (Dt 26:18, cp Dt 26:18NLT)...
And they did not say, ‘Where is the
Lord Who brought us up out of the land of Egypt, Who led us through
the wilderness, Through a land of deserts and of pits, Through a land
of drought and of deep darkness, Through a land that no one crossed
And where no man dwelt?’7 “And I brought you into the fruitful land,
To eat its fruit and its good things. But you came and defiled My
land, And My inheritance you made an abomination.8 “The priests did
not say, ‘Where is the Lord?’ And those who handle the law did not
know Me; The rulers also transgressed against Me, And the prophets
prophesied by Baal And walked after things that did not profit. (Jer
2:6-8)
Paul records Israel's
lofty spiritual privileges in Romans 9 writing...
For I could wish that I myself were
accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my
kinsmen according to the flesh, 4 who are Israelites, to whom belongs
the adoption as sons and the glory and the covenants and the giving of
the Law and the temple service and the promises, 5 whose are the
fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is
over all, God blessed forever. Amen. (Ro 9:3, 4, 5-notes)
Comment: And yet in spite of
these many advantages, they choose to rebel. This recalls
Jeremiah's words that "The heart is more deceitful than all else And
is desperately sick; Who can understand it?" (Je 17:9, 10)
Charles Simeon summarizes
their privileges observing
that...
God had truly “nourished them, and
brought them up as children.” He had chosen them to Himself, as His
peculiar people (Dt 26:18KJV); He had brought them up out of Egypt with
a mighty
hand and an out-stretched arm (Dt 4:34, 5:15, 7:19, 9:29, 11:2,
26:8, 1Ki 8:42, 2Ki 17:36, 2Chr 6:32, Ps 136:12-Surgeon's
note Je 27:5,
32:17, 21 contrast Je 21:51, see also Ezek 20:33 =
Great Tribulation or Time of
Jacob's Distress
and Ezek 20:34 = God's deliverance of the believing
remnant
at the end of the time of Jacob's distress - Je 30:7, 8, 9, 10): He had fed and supported them forty
years in the wilderness (Dt 2:7, 8:2, 3, 4, 29:5, Neh 9:21, Ex 16:35);
He had given them a revelation of His mind
and will; and He had planted them in that good land which He had
promised to their fathers (Dt 1:25, 6:18, 8:7, God's grace
[unmerited favor] = Dt 9:6 His warning not to forget Dt
8:10,11; His other warnings concerning the good land = 1Chr
28:8, Dt 11:16, 17, Josh 23:12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 1Ki 14:15). In all this
He had acted towards them with
all the care and tenderness of a most affectionate Parent (Dt 1:31,
32:9, 10, 11, 12) (Ed: Scripture references added - these
Scriptures are worth taking a moment and pondering, for we too like
Judah are so prone to forget our Father's bestowal of such lofty
privileges and promises on us His children by grace through faith.)
Barnhouse rightly
observes...
What depths of sin there are in the
human heart that we can see such love and then doubt its reality and
permanence. (Romans).
Motyer comments that...
Unlike contemporary pagans, who
considered themselves children of their god by some quasi-physical act
of begetting, Israel was the Lord’s son by historical divine choice
and by the exodus as a work of redemption. Redemption initiated a
process of divine providential care. The picture of the attentive
parent and the growing child covers the whole historical period from
Exodus to Isaiah. The grace which saved and the love which cared were
alike rebuffed when they … rebelled. ‘They’ is emphatic—‘they of all
people!’, the heirs of redemption, the recipients of parental care.
(Motyer, J. A. The Prophecy of Isaiah: An introduction & commentary.
Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press)
In Deuteronomy God asks
rhetorical questions to cause His Jewish readers to ponder their privileged
upbringing...
For what great nation is there that
has a god so near to it as is the LORD our God whenever we call on
Him? Or what great nation is there that has statutes and judgments as
righteous as this whole law which I am setting before you today?
(Deuteronomy 4:7, 8)
Keil and Delitzsch sum up
this section...
Israel was Jehovah’s son (Ex
4:22, 23). All the members of the nation were His children (Deut.
14:1; 32:20). Jehovah was Israel’s father, by whom it had been
begotten (Dt.32:6, 18). The existence of Israel as a nation was
secured indeed, like that of all other nations, by natural
reproduction, and not by spiritual regeneration. But the primary
ground of Israel’s origin was the supernatural and mighty word of
promise (cp Josh 23:14) given to Abraham, in Ge 17:15, 16; and it was
by a series of manifestations of miraculous power and displays of
divine grace, that the development of Israel, which dated from that
starting-point, was brought up to the position it had reached at the
time of the exodus from Egypt. It was in this sense that Israel had
been begotten by Jehovah.
And this relation between Jehovah
and Israel, as His children, had now, at the time when Jehovah was
speaking through the mouth of Isaiah, a long and gracious past behind
it, viz., the period of Israel’s childhood in Egypt; the
period of its youth in the desert; and a period of growing
manhood from Joshua to Samuel: so that Jehovah could say, “I have
brought up children, and raised them high.”
The piel (giddel - [01431][gadal])
used here signifies “to make great;” and when applied to children, as
it is here and in other passages, such as 2Ki10:6, it means to
bring up, to make great, so far as natural growth is concerned.
The pilel (romem - [07311][rum]),
which corresponds to the piel in the so-called verbis cavis, and which
is also used in Isa 23:4 and Ezek 31:4 as the parallel to giddel,
signifies to lift up, and is used in a “dignified sense,” with
reference to the position of eminence, to which, step by step, a wise
and loving father advances a child.
These two verbs depict the state of
Israel in the times of David and Solomon, as one of mature manhood
and proud exaltation, which had to a certain extent returned under
Uzziah and Jotham. (The
Prophecies of Isaiah)
But they have revolted
against Me: (Isa 63:9,10; Dt 9:22, 23, 24; Jer 2:5, 6, 7,
8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13; Mal 1:6)
THE DRAMATIC CONTRAST:
"PRIVILEGED SONS REBEL"!
Spurgeon paraphrases God as
if He was saying...
"If they were simply My subjects,
I could bear their rebellion better than I can now, for they are My
children. I have nourished them, and brought them up; and after long
and persevering kindness towards them, I might have expected some
affection from them in return: but ’they have rebelled against Me."
Israel was sinning against a flood
of light.
What would God say about the modern day evangelical church
dear saint? (cp 1Co 5:1)
Warren Wiersbe comments
that...
Unlike Jeremiah and Ezekiel, Isaiah
did not begin his book with an account of his call to ministry. This
he gives in chapter 6. Instead, he started with a probing examination
of Judah’s present situation and gave a passionate plea for God’s
people to return to the Lord.
As you read his analysis, note
how closely it parallels our situation in the Western world.
(Wiersbe, W. W. Be Comforted. Wheaton, Ill.: Victor Books) (Bolding
and color added) Ortlund writes that...
Paul Tournier, the Swiss
psychiatrist, observed, “A diffuse and vague guilt feeling kills the
personality, whereas the conviction of sin gives life to it.” Isaiah
begins with life-giving conviction of sin. It’s our first step back to
God. We need a sense of sin. We shouldn’t fear it or resent it. It is
not destructive. It is life-giving, if we have the courage to let
Christ save us. We are often told—or just whispered to—that what we
need is more self-esteem. That is false. What we need is more humility
and more Christ-esteem. (Ortlund, R. C., Jr, Isaiah: God Saves
Sinners. Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books)
Comment: Ortlund's
commentary is part of an excellent series edited by R. Kent Hughes [Preaching
the Word] [computer version =
Preaching the Word Collection]
and as a literary work Ortlund's commentary on Isaiah is quite
eloquent, but unfortunately he seeks to apply Isaiah's teaching
primarily to the church (albeit his application points as demonstrated
by this present quote are generally good) and for the most part
(exceptions include prophecies of Messiah) does not approach Isaiah's
prophecy to Judah and Jerusalem literally (e.g., there is no mention
of the glorious millennium [see
Millennium
for a veritable plethora of
passages prophesying of the covenant promises of Jehovah to Judah and
Jerusalem {and Israel}] -- take for example a section where Ortlund
completely ignores the literal interpretation of Isaiah 1:26
concluding that it is primarily addressed to the church {a mystery in
the OT! cp Ep 3:4, 5-note,
Ep 3:6-note}
writing primarily again from an applicational perspective --"The
discipline of God achieves just what He intends, in purification and
in restoration, both at the same time. We can expect the goodness of
God to show up in unlikely experiences. When He turns His hand against
us to purify us, let’s trust him to restore us.", page 45 - Read
Isa 1:26 remembering to whom it was addressed in Isa 1:1! We cannot
ignore the obvious lest the thrust and gist of much of Isaiah's
prophecy becomes muddled and misunderstood!] and so it cannot be given
a high recommendation as one which reproducibly rightly divides the
word of truth - 2Ti 2:15 -note.
A W Tozer sounds a similar
note of sound (healthy) doctrinal clarification writing that...
In our time we have overemphasized
the psychology of the sinner’s condition. We spend much time
describing the woe of the sinner, the grief of the sinner and the
great burden he carries. He does have all of these, but we have
overemphasized them until we forget the principal fact—that the sinner
is actually a rebel against properly constituted authority! That is
what makes sin, sin. We are rebels. We are sons of disobedience
(Ep 2:2-note,
Ep 5:6-note).
Sin is the breaking of the law and we are in rebellion and we are
fugitives from the just laws of God while we are sinners.
By way of illustration, suppose a
man escapes from prison. Certainly he will have grief. He is going to
be in pain after bumping logs and stones and fences as he crawls and
hides away in the dark. He is going to be hungry and cold and weary.
His beard will grow long and he will be tired and cramped and cold—all
of these will happen, but they are incidental to the fact that he is a
fugitive from justice and a rebel against law.
So it is with sinners. Certainly
they are heartbroken and they carry a heavy load. Certainly they labor
and are heavy-laden. The Bible takes full account of these things; but
they are incidental to the fact that the reason the sinner is what he
is, is because he has rebelled against the laws of God and he is a
fugitive from divine judgment.
It is that which constitutes the
nature of sin; not the fact that he carries a heavy load of misery and
sadness and guilt. These things constitute only the outcropping of the
sinful nature, but the root of sin is rebellion against law, rebellion
against God. Does not the sinner say: “I belong to myself—I owe
allegiance to no one unless I choose to give it!” That is the essence
of sin.
But thankfully, salvation reverses
that and restores the former relationship so that the first thing the
returning sinner does is to confess: “Father, I have sinned against
heaven and in Thy sight, and I am no more worthy to be called Thy son.
Make me as one of Thy hired servants.” (Lk 15:19)
Thus, in repentance, we reverse
that relationship and we fully submit to the Word of God and the will
of God, as obedient children (cp 1Pe 1:3-note;
1Pe 1:14-note).
(The Tozer Pulpit. Volume 2) (Bolding added)
><>><>><>
Louis Blanc, French socialist and
historian, said shortly before his execution, “When I was an infant, I
rebelled against my nurse. When I was a child, I rebelled against my
teachers. When I was a young man, I rebelled against my mother and
father. When I reached a mature age, I rebelled against the state.
When I die, if there is a heaven and a God, I’ll rebel against them!”
><>><>><>
They have revolted - This is
not just an accusation of rebellion in general but that which is
specifically against the rule and reign of the sovereign God of the
universe, the Holy One of Israel.
Revolted (06586) (pasha)
means to transgress, to sin, to rebel. The idea is a willful flouting
of authority by willfully violating a law! Pasha means to , be
in open defiance of an authority or standard of an agreement.
Pasha was used in treaties to speak of a
vassal state’s disobedience to the covenant made with it by the
suzerain (a dominant state controlling the foreign relations of a
vassal state but allowing it sovereign authority in its internal
affairs) nation.
A rebel is one who who
revolts from the government to which he owes allegiance, either by
openly renouncing the authority of that government, or by taking arms
and openly opposing it.
Pasha - 37v in OT and 8x in
Isaiah - 1 Ki. 8:50; 12:19; 2 Ki. 1:1; 3:5, 7; 8:20, 22; 2 Chr. 10:19;
21:8, 10; Ezr. 10:13; Ps. 37:38; 51:13; Prov. 18:19; 28:21; Isa.
1:2, 28; 43:27; 46:8; 48:8; 53:12; 59:13; 66:24; Jer. 2:8, 29;
3:13; 33:8; Lam. 3:42; Ezek. 2:3; 18:31; 20:38; Dan. 8:23; Hos. 7:13;
8:1; 14:9; Amos 4:4; Zeph. 3:11
Pasha in this verse thus
conveys the idea of breaking a
contract, and as it relates to Israel speaks of breaking the solemn
covenant entered at Mt Sinai (Ex 19:5,6, 7. Note carefully Israel's
response Ex 19:8, cp their response when Moses told them the "ten
commandments" - Ex 24:3, 7; How quickly did they break the covenant?
Ex 32:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). They subsequently
repeatedly broke this covenant through unbelief and worship of idol
rather than worship of the one true God. In short, they rebelled and
thus sinned against Jehovah. Notice that a key aspect of sin is rebellion
against divine authority (Isa 66:24; Je 2:29; 3:13, cp Isa 30:1, 9).
Barnes comments that...
God had shown them special favors.
He recounted his mercy in bringing them out of Egypt; and on the
ground of this, he demanded obedience and love; compare Ex 20:1,2,3.
And yet they bad forgotten him, and rebelled against him. The Targum
of Jonathan, an ancient Chaldee version, has well expressed the idea
here. ‘Hear, O heavens, which were moved when I gave my law to my
people: give ear, O earth, which didst tremble before my word, for the
Lord has spoken. My people, the house of Israel, whom I called sons —
I loved them — I honored them, and they rebelled against me.’ The same
is true substantially of all sinners; and alas, how often may a
similar expostulation be made with the professed people of God!
(Barnes' Notes on the Old Testament - Volume VII)
Revolt and rebellion against the
Lord, Isaiah said, was a part of the character of Israel from its
birth and throughout its history (Isa 48:8; 59:13, 63:10). Amos 4:4 describes
Israel’s insistence to worship at the unapproved sanctuaries at Bethel
and Gilgal as revolt and rebellion. It is noteworthy that in spite of
their gross rebellion against His authority, Jehovah did promise that
He would restore His people one day and forgive their sin of rebellion
(Je 33:8).
Keil and Delitzsch has this
note on pasha...
The radical meaning of the verb
pasha is to break away, or break loose...The idea is that of
dissolving connection with a person with violence and self-will; here
it relates to that inward severance from God, and renunciation of Him,
which preceded all outward acts of sin, and which not only had
idolatry for its full and outward manifestation, but was truly
idolatry in all its forms.
From the time that Solomon gave
himself up to the worship of idols, at the close of his reign (Ed:
circa 931BC, 1Ki 11:9, 10, 11, 12, 13), down to the days of Isaiah (Ed:
ministry began circa 739BC), idolatry had never entirely or
permanently ceased to exist, even in public. In two different
reformations the attempt had been made to suppress it, viz., in the
one commenced by
Asa
and concluded by
Jehoshaphat;
and in the one carried out by
Joash,
during the lifetime of the high priest Jehoiada, his tutor and
deliverer. But the first was not successful in suppressing it
altogether; and what
Joash
removed, returned with double abominations as soon as
Jehoiada
was dead. Consequently the words, “They have rebelled against Me,”
which sum up all the ingratitude of Israel in one word, and trace it
to its root, apply to the whole history of Israel, from its
culminating point under David and Solomon, down to the prophet’s own
time. (Ed: I agree but remember that Isaiah is speaking
primarily to Judah and Jerusalem, Isa 1:1).
Pasha - 37 OT uses - 1Ki
8:50; 12:19; 2Ki 1:1; 3:5, 7; 8:20, 22; 2Chr 10:19; 21:8, 10; Ezra.
10:13; Ps 37:38; 51:13; Pr 18:19; 28:21; Isa 1:2, 28; 43:27; 46:8;
48:8; 53:12; 59:13; 66:24; Je 2:8, 29; 3:13; 33:8; Lam 3:42; Ezek 2:3;
18:31; 20:38; Da 8:23; Ho 7:13; 8:1; 14:9; Amos 4:4; Zeph. 3:11 Vine adds that...
The basic sense of pasha is
“to rebel.” There are two stages of rebellion. First, the whole
process of rebellion has independence in view: “Then Moab rebelled
against Israel after the death of Ahab” (2Kings 1:1). Second, the
final result of the rebellion is the state of independence: “In his
days Edom revolted from under the hand of Judah, and made a king over
themselves” (2Kings 8:20). A more radical meaning is the state of
rebellion in which there is no end of the rebellion in view. The
process is no longer goal-oriented. The state thus described refers to
a status quo: “So Israel rebelled against the house of David unto this
day” (1Kings 12:19).
Isaiah alludes to this spiritual revolution and its effect on His
Holy Trinity in chapter 63...
Isaiah 63:10 But they rebelled
(marah - were contentious; cp Dt 9:23, 24, Ps 78:8, Je 5:23; Lxx =
apeitheo = were disobedient, a manifestation of their refusal to
believe God!) and grieved (Hebrew = 'atsab = to hurt, pain,
vex, grieve, used in Ge 6:6, Ps 78:40, Isa 54:6; Lxx = paroxuno =
literally means to sharpen, figuratively to cause a state of inward
arousal, provocation or irritation) His Holy Spirit; Therefore,
He turned Himself to become their enemy, He fought against them.
As we study Isaiah's record of
Israel's rebellion, we need to treat his forthtelling as a "mirror" by
which can examine our relation with God, for as Paul wrote centuries
later...
Now these things happened to them
as an example (tupos
- word study),
and they were written for our instruction (admonition, warning -
nouthesia - word study),
upon whom the ends of the ages have come. (1Co 10:11)
How we need to take heed lest we as
believers grieve God our Father as Israel did and suffer loss (not of
salvation but of rewards) not only in this age but in the age to come
(cp 2Cor 5:10, 1Co 3:10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 2Jn 1:8, Re 22:12, Ps
62:12, Isa 3:10, 11, Jer 17:10).
McGee makes an interesting
point in drawing a parallel with passages in Deuteronomy which refer
to how a "prodigal son" was to be treated...
As His children, they had rebelled
against the Mosaic Law in this connection. In the Book of Deuteronomy
note the law concerning an incorrigible son:
If any man has a stubborn and
rebellious son who will not obey his father or his mother, and when
they chastise him, he will not even listen to them, 19 then his father
and mother shall seize him, and bring him out to the elders of his
city at the gateway of his home town. 20 "And they shall say to the
elders of his city, 'This son of ours is stubborn and rebellious, he
will not obey us, he is a glutton and a drunkard.' 21 "Then all the
men of his city shall stone him to death; so you shall remove the evil
from your midst, and all Israel shall hear of it and fear. (Deut.
21:18, 19, 20, 21).
Tozer describe rebellious
people explaining that...
Because man is born a rebel, he is
unaware that he is one. His constant assertion of self, as far as he
thinks of it at all, appears to him a perfectly normal thing. He is
willing to share himself, sometimes even to sacrifice himself for a
desired end, but never to dethrone himself. (The Knowledge of the
Holy)
Alexander Maclaren adds
that...
A true prophet’s words are of
universal application, even when they are most specially addressed to
a particular audience. Just because this indictment was so true of
Judah, is it true of all men, for it is not concerned with details
peculiar to a long-past period and state of society, but with the
broad generalities common to us all. As another great teacher in Old
Testament times said, ‘I will not reprove thee for thy sacrifices or
thy burnt-offerings, to have been continually before me.’ (Ps 50:8)
Isaiah has nothing to say about ritual or ceremonial omissions, which
to him were but surface matters after all, but he sets in blazing
light the foundation facts of Judah’s (and every man’s) distorted
relation to God. And how lovingly, as well as sternly, God speaks
through him! That divine lament which heralds the searching indictment
is not unworthy to be the very words of the Almighty Lover of all men,
sorrowing over His prodigal and fugitive sons.
Nor is its deep truth less than its
tenderness. For is not man’s sin blackest when seen against the bright
background of God’s fatherly love? True, the fatherhood that Isaiah
knew referred to God’s relation to the nation rather than to the
individual, but the great truth which is perfectly revealed by the
Perfect Son was in part shown to the prophet. The east was bright with
the unrisen sun, and the tinted clouds that hovered above the place of
its rising seemed as if yearning to open and let him through. (Isaiah
1:1-9, 16-20 The Great Suit: Jehovah Versus Judah)
Matthew Henry comments that
God...
charges them with base ingratitude,
a crime of the highest nature. Call a man ungrateful, and you can call
him no worse. Let heaven and earth hear and wonder at, 1. God's
gracious dealings with such a peevish provoking people as they were:
"I have nourished and brought them up as children; they have been well
fed and well taught'' (Dt 32:6); "I have magnified and exalted them''
(so some), "not only made them grow, but made them great-not only
maintained them, but preferred them-not only trained them up, but
raised them high.''
Note, We owe the continuance of our
lives and comforts, and all our advancements, to God's fatherly care
of us and kindness to us.
2. Their ill-natured conduct
towards him, who was so tender of them: "They have rebelled against
me,'' or (as some read it) "they have revolted from me; they have been
deserters, nay traitors, against my crown and dignity.'' Note, All the
instances of God's favour to us, as the God both of our nature and of
our nurture, aggravate our treacherous departures from him and all our
presumptuous oppositions to him-children, and yet rebels!
Application
Don't go to the next verse
without at least being open and willing to personally apply this
passage. What is it that God has clearly told me to do (either
recently or in the distant past) but which I have failed to carry out
and/or which I have willfully rebelled against?
(cp Pr 28:13, 1Jn 1:9)
><>><>><>
Unruly Children - READ:
Isaiah 1:1-9,16-20 - I once had a pet raccoon by the name of Jason.
Having affectionately cared for this "little bandit" for several
months, I was amazed and frustrated when he forgot my friendship and
turned on me. In fact, there were occasions when he sank his teeth
into the very hands that fed him.
The prophet Isaiah emphasized the unruly behavior of the people of
Israel in the first chapter of his book. He said that a dumb ox
recognizes his owner, and the stubborn donkey knows enough to come
home to his own stall (Isa 1:3). But Israel ignored God's tender care
and eventually provoked Him to anger (Isa 1:4).
The people of Israel turned away from the Lord like rebellious
children. Their worship and sacrifices became a stench in the nostrils
of God, for their hearts were far from Him. They resisted His gracious
warnings and finally experienced divine judgment. The land of milk and
honey was looted and ransacked before their very eyes.
As believers, we should tremble at the thought of spurning the grace
and mercy of God. By yielding to Christ and heeding the warning of the
Spirit when we sin, we can avoid His chastening and instead enjoy the
blessings reserved for His repentant children. — Mart De Haan
(Our
Daily Bread, Copyright RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI. Reprinted by
permission. All rights reserved)
"We love You, Lord Jesus," we often
may say,
But are we as ready His will to obey?
Let's heed what God's Spirit would have us to do,
For that's how we show Him a love that is true. --DJD
Respond to undeserved blessing with unreserved obedience. |
|
|
Isaiah
1:3
An
ox
knows its
owner, and a
donkey its
master's
manger, but
Israel does not
know, my
people do not
understand. (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
English Translation of
the Greek (Septuagint):
The ox knows his owner, and the ass his master's crib: but Israel does
not know me, and the people has not regarded me.
Amplified: The ox [instinctively] knows his owner, and the
donkey his master’s crib, but Israel does not know or recognize Me [as
Lord], My people do not consider or understand.
(Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
KJV: The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master's crib:
but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider.
NET: An ox recognizes its owner, a donkey recognizes
where its owner puts its food; but Israel does not recognize me, my
people do not understand."
(NET
Bible)
NJB: The ox knows its owner and the donkey its master's
crib; Israel does not know, my people do not understand.' (NJB)
NLT: Even the animals--the donkey and the ox--know their
owner and appreciate his care, but not my people Israel. No matter
what I do for them, they still do not understand. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: An ox hath known its owner, And an ass the
crib of its master, Israel hath not known, My people hath not
understood. |
|
|
An ox knows its owner, and
a donkey its master's manger, but Israel does not know, My people do
not understand: (Proverbs 6:6; Jeremiah 8:7) (Isa 5:12;
27:11; 44:18; Deuteronomy 32:28,29; Psalms 94:8; Jeremiah 4:22; 9:3,
4, 5, 6; 10:8,14; Matthew 13:13, 14, 15,19; Romans 1:28; 2Peter 3:5)
An ox knows its owner - The
ox recognizes and/or is submissive to the owner. Remember that this is God Himself
making this pithy assessment. God's indictment of Judah's
rebellion is made all the more striking with a vivid illustration (cp
Is 8:7) which contrasts His own people with "dumb" animals
who are actually "smarter" than Judah. He says that
even these dumb animals know their owner or their master's manger
because of the owner's care for the animal. God says with what seems a sense of
amazement that His people have behaved worse than these dumb
brute beasts of burden! How sad that Judah did not have as much
devotion to their Holy Master as animals do for their human masters!
Jeremiah makes a similar
allusion (speaking of Judah) writing that...
Even the stork in the sky knows her
seasons; and the turtledove and the swift and the thrush observe the
time of their migration, but My people do not know the ordinance of
the LORD (to not know His ordinance is not to know Him). (Jeremiah
8:7)
Beloved, do you know your Owner?
Do your choices validate or substantiate your answer? Do your thoughts, words and
deeds demonstrate who is your real master?
(cp Mt 6:24-note)
If you are a believer, are you daily denying self (Mk 8:34, saying
"No" to your will) and seeking to live in submission to the will (good
and acceptable and perfect - Ro 12:2-note)
and authority of Jehovah?
We
rebel against the Lord's authority when we refuse to submit every area
of our life to His Lordship. Is there some area you have reserved just
for you? Then beware and
remember Judah's example which demonstrates that it’s only a matter of
time, unless there is recognition and repentance, that sons become
rebels and rebels become harlots!
Spurgeon remarks that...
Men are more brutish than the
beasts that perish. The lower animals, as men contemptuously call
them, acknowledge the hand that feeds them; but men receive the bounty
of God through long years, and yet live as if there were no God at
all, and feel no gratitude to him whatsoever. Israel was God’s
peculiar people, highly favored, and greatly indulged, and this made
it all the worse for the Lord to be able to contrast them and the
brute creation: “The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master’s
crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider.”
(Exposition of Isaiah)
The late renowned expositor
James Montgomery Boice once made an interesting observation that
relates to the spiritual declension in Judah and much of the modern
church...
It is important to understand two
steps in the spiritual decline of nominally religious people. Such
people do not live for God, though they think they do. They live for
self, and the first stage of their decline is to put off the day of
reckoning. At this stage they know what is right and expect to do the
right someday. But in the meantime they want the imagined benefits of
a life of sin. The second stage comes when sin has so trapped them and
distorted their thinking that they lose sight of what is right or
wrong and imagine their sin to be right conduct. At this point, far
from putting off the day of reckoning, they actually desire it. They
imagine that their deeds will be vindicated and that the people they
have wronged will be shown to be deserving of their conduct. (From The
Minor Prophets: An Expositional Commentary. Page 196. Baker Books.
2002)
Harry Ironside asks...
Do we really know it? Does hunger
ever drive us to it; or, are we often found foolishly sniffing the
desert air, following the wind like the wild donkey, our backs on
God's well-filled storehouse, vainly seeking a satisfactory portion in
the world we have professed to judge? Solemn questions these, not to
be evaded or ignored, but faced in the presence of the Lord: lest a
day come when, of us too He shall have to say, "Ah sinful nation, a
people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are
corrupters: they have forsaken the Lord, they have provoked the Holy
One of Israel unto anger, they are gone away backward" (Isa 1:4, cp Mt
7:21-note,
Mt 7:22-note,
Mt 7:23-note)
Surgeon concludes that...
Men are more brutish than the
beasts. They receive all at the Lord's hands, and they utterly forget
Him. Alas, Lord God, that Thou should thus be treated! (Ed:
And don't we as believers
do a similar gross injustice when we sin against the light of His Word
and the enabling power of His grace in Christ Jesus?! Beloved let us
read and study Isaiah as if it were a mirror, showing us through Judah
rebellion, our own spiritual imperfections, that we might seek rest in
repentance and a holy walk of obedience.)
Donkey (02543) (chamowr)
is the well known beast of burden common in the Middle East and
proverbial for dullness and stupidity.
Master (01167) (baal)
depending on the context can mean husband (used this way about 15x) or
lord, but some 50 times refers to the pagan deity Baal. In the
present context baal refers to one who possesses something
(animate or inanimate) and controls their movement and/or activities.
There is a play on words or more accurately on roles (whether intended
or not) for later in Isaiah we see baal used of God, Isaiah
recording...
(God is speaking these words of
promise and hope to Israel) Fear not, for you will not be put to
shame; Neither feel humiliated, for you will not be disgraced; but you
will forget the shame of your youth, and the reproach of your
widowhood you will remember no more. For your husband (baal)
is your Maker, Whose name is the Lord of hosts; and your Redeemer is
the Holy One of Israel, Who is called the God of all the earth. 6 “For
the Lord has called you, like a wife forsaken and grieved in spirit,
even like a wife of one’s youth when she is rejected,” says your God.
7 “For a brief moment I forsook you (God speaking to Israel), but with
great compassion I will gather you. 8 “In an outburst of anger I hid
My face from you for a moment, but with everlasting lovingkindness
(this reflects God's faithfulness to keep His unconditional covenant
with Abraham) I will have compassion on you,” Says the Lord your
Redeemer. (Is 54:4, 5, 6, 7, 8)
Jeremiah uses baal
explaining that the New Covenant will not be...
like the covenant which I made with
their fathers in the day I took them by the hand to bring them out of
the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, although I was a
husband (baal) to them," declares the LORD. (Jer 31:32, cp
the new covenant in Jer 31:33, 34)
Manger (18) (ebus
from abas = to fatten) refers to the
stall, barn, or crib, where cattle are fed or fattened.
Jamieson feels that the manger refers "spiritually (to) the word and
ordinances." That is possible but one is always well advised to be
very cautious when interpreting figurative language, he
stray too far from the Author's intended meaning.
Barnes offers a more
straightforward interpretation writing that...
The donkey has sufficient
knowledge to understand that his support is derived from that. The
idea is, that the ox was more submissive to laws than the Jews;
and that even the most stupid animal better knew from where support
was to be derived, than they did the source of their comfort and
protection. The donkey would not wander away, and the ox
would not rebel as they had done. This comparison was very striking,
and very humiliating, and nothing could be more suited to bring down
their pride. (Barnes' Notes on the Old Testament - Volume VII)
The brutes obey their God,
And bow their necks to men;
But we more base, more brutish things,
Reject his easy reign.
--Watts
Judah (and Israel) should have been
willing to submit to the Lord's loving leadership, Hosea describing
His gentle care for them...
I led them with cords of a man,
with bonds of love, and I became to them as one who lifts the yoke
from their jaws; and I bent down and fed them. (Ho 11:4)
Comment: Despite such divine
watchcare, Israel choose to rebel! How often I imitate their stupidity
because every sin is a rebellion against my God!
Henry Morris draws a
parallel with this passage and the New Testament birth of Messiah
writing that...
"Crib" is the same as "manger."
Although the animals could recognize their Maker when His parents "laid
him in a manger" (Luke 2:7), the leaders of the nation ignored Him
and then sought to kill Him (Matthew 2:16).
(Morris,
Henry: Defenders Study Bible. World Publishing)
McGee writes that
This verse is a splendid piece of
satire. The two animals that are used for illustrations do not have a
reputation for being very intelligent. Neither the ox nor the
long-eared donkey has a very high l.Q. The expression “dumb as an ox”
is still often used. The donkey does not wear a Phi Beta Kappa key. I
should qualify that statement: I admit that I have met a few who do!
However, even these animals have intelligence enough to know who feeds
them.
Motyer writes that...
The Lord’s dealings with His people
are designed to develop true spiritual instincts, a mind-set of
attachment to the Lord as automatic and spontaneous as that seen in
the animal creation. (Ibid)
Alexander Maclaren adds
that...
Man’s neglect of God’s benefits
puts him below the animals that ‘know’ the hand that feeds and governs
them. Some men think it a token of superior ‘culture’ and advanced
views to throw off allegiance to God. It is a token that they have
less intelligence than their dog.
There is something very beautiful
and pathetic in the fact that Judah is not directly addressed, but
that Isa 1:2, 3, 4 are a divine soliloquy. They might rather be called
a father’s lament than an indictment. The forsaken father is, as it
were, sadly brooding over his erring child’s sins, which are his
father’s sorrows and his own miseries. (Isaiah
1:1-9, 16-20 The Great Suit: Jehovah Versus Judah)
Illustration - A Haifa
policeman, who knew his Bible, got on the trail of a gang of
smugglers. They used an donkey-drawn caravan to escape. The policemen
managed to capture some of the donkeys, though the smugglers got away.
The clever officer let the beasts of burden go without food for
several days and then he turned them loose. And just as he predicted
from Isaiah 1:3, “the ox knoweth his owner, and the donkey his
master’s crib,” the starving animals led the police directly to the
smuggler’s hide-out! —World Christian Digest
But Israel does not know - In
the
Septuagint (LXX),
the Greek translates this phrase with a negative (ou) which signifies
absolute negation - "Israel absolutely does not know" (cp
lack of knowledge in
Hosea 4:1-6 above)
Barnes notes that...
The Latin Vulgate, the Septuagint
("Israel does not know me"), and the Arabic, add the word ‘Me.’
The word know is used in the sense of recognizing Him as their
Lord; of acknowledging Him, or submitting to Him. (Ibid)
Compare the following passage...
Now the sons of Eli were worthless
(belial = good for nothing, unprofitable, the name used for Satan in
2Co 6:15) men. They did not know (yada') Jehovah (1Sa
2:12).
Comment: Eli was the priest
of Israel and yet what were his sons? From this context why were they
described as worthless? Of whom did they not have an intimate
knowledge? Corollary: If we want our life to count, we do well to
spend our days growing in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ (2Pe 3:18-note)!
Know (03045) (yada') does
not mean simply to have knowledge of something, but also speaks of an
intimate acquaintance with someone. For example, yada' was the
verb used to describe a man knowing an woman in an intimate way as
when "Adam knew Eve his wife and she conceived..." (Ge 4:1) In Hebrew
thought “knowledge” means more than information so that knowledge was
seen in fundamentally relational terms. To know God then is to be in a
right relationship with Him, and involves intimacy and experience.
Isaiah is saying to his Hebrew audience that for the most part, most
of them did not have an intimate relationship with Jehovah.
The OT repeatedly records
Israel's lack of a genuine knowledge of God...
For My people are foolish, they
know Me not; They are stupid children and have no understanding.
They are shrewd to do evil, but to do good they do not know.
(Jeremiah 4:22)
They bend their tongue like their
bow; lies and not truth prevail in the land; for they proceed from
evil to evil, and they do not know Me,” declares the
Lord...Your dwelling is in the midst of deceit; through deceit they
refuse to know Me,” declares the Lord. (Jeremiah 9:3, 6)
Every man is stupid, devoid of
knowledge. Every goldsmith is put to shame by his idols, for his
molten images are deceitful, and there is no breath in them. (Jeremiah
10:14)
My people - What divine
longsuffering we see here for God still calls them My people,
despite their repeated rebellion against Him and not acting like
His people.
God's
possession is emphatically signified by this little phrase which is so
important that we find it repeated 26 times in Isaiah (Is 1:3; 3:12,
15; 5:13; 10:2, 24; 19:25; 22:4; 26:20; 32:13, 18; 40:1; 47:6; 51:4,
16; 52:4, 5, 6, 14; 53:8; 57:14; 58:1; 63:8; 65:10, 19, 22) My
people emphasizes their choice by God to be His very own and His
desire to comfort them. Not only had Jehovah created them as a nation (cp Ge 32:27, 28)
but then redeemed them from bondage to Egypt (Ex 6:6,7).
Spurgeon remarks that...
See how the Lord still owns the
children of Israel as His people, though He contrasts their conduct
with the behavior of the ox and the donkey. So we see that, however
far God’s people may have gone into sin, they are His people still,
and He does not deny their relationship to Him.
Keil and Delitzsch
comment that...
An ox has a certain knowledge of
its buyer and owner, to whom it willingly submits; and a donkey has at
least a knowledge of the crib of its master, i.e., it knows that it is
its master who fills its crib or manger with fodder.... Israel had
no such knowledge, neither instinctive and direct, nor acquired by
reflection...This nation, bearing as it did the God-given title of a
hero of faith and prayer, this favourite nation of Jehovah, had let
itself down far below the level of the brutes.
Understand (0995) (biyn)
means to have insight and is not just mere accumulation of data but an
understanding that results from comparative study. Biyn also conveys the
idea of having the capacity to discern (To distinguish,
discriminate or see the difference between two or more things. NAS
translates biyn discern, discerning or discernment some 25 times) between what is good and what
is evil (cp "discern" in Ps 19:12). Judah lacked this vitally
important ability.
Biyn - 20x in Isaiah -
Isa. 1:3; 3:3; 5:21; 6:9, 10; 10:13; 14:16; 28:9, 19; 29:14, 16; 32:4;
40:14, 21; 43:10, 18; 44:18; 52:15; 56:11; 57:1
Judah did not know or understand
that Jehovah was their Owner and their Master and that as such they
belonged solely to Him and were to always be dependent upon Him as a
loving Father to supply all of their needs. But sadly they yearned for
the "leeks...and the garlic" (Nu 11:5) of this fallen world and that
is what they ran after. When we loose sight of the truth that God is
to be our sufficiency, we begin to seek other sources to supply our
needs and greeds and the result is usually sin. We do well to read and
heed, dear fellow believer!
Through an earlier prophet
Moses, Israel was instructed to guard and live out the statutes and
judgments of Jehovah...
So keep and do them, (why?)
for that is your wisdom and your understanding (biynah from
biyn) in the sight of the peoples (those who were not Jews, i.e.,
Gentiles - Israel was to be a light unto the Gentiles, a witness of
the one true, living God) who will hear all these statutes and say,
'Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding (biyn)
people.' (Dt 4:6)
Comment: A person who is
wise and understanding (who has the ability to discern between
good and evil) is one who characteristically knows the best goals for
which to strive and the best paths to take. God is saying through
Isaiah, that His people failed in this area of understanding.
In the remainder of Isaiah 1, the prophet will explain in more
specific terms how their failure to know and understand God and His
Word led to bypaths rather than the "highway of holiness".
Moses later writes
they are a nation lacking in
counsel (Heb = 'etsah = way of thinking and refers to a mental
attitude, a state of mind, or viewpoint that determines the decisions
one makes), and there is no understanding (Heb = tebuna [from
root biyn] - capacity for discerning a right course of action) in them. Would that they were
wise, that they understood (act with insight, to be prudent) this, that they would
discern (biyn) their future!
(Dt 32:28, 29)
Ed Young commenting on
do not understand writes that this means...
Does not engage in conscious
reflection either upon its own true interests or upon its immense
obligations. The animals which did not have the ability to consider
(understand), did at least know whence came their sustenance. Although
endowed with capacities not possessed by the animals, Israel did not
employ these divinely given capacities and so appears as less
understanding than the beasts. (Young, E. The Book of Isaiah: Volume
1: William B. Eerdmans)
The psalmist writes that...
Psalm 49:20 Man in his pomp, yet
without understanding (biyn), is like the beasts that perish.
Stedman comments that...
Isaiah lived in a time of national
stress, when man's true nature was visible and was exposing itself for
what it was just as in our day. He was terribly bothered over man's
innate rebelliousness, as he cries out in the opening chapter. The
nation has deliberately forsaken the ways of God and their stupid
obstinacy is simply beyond his understanding. "Why," he says, "even
the ox knows its owner, and the ass its master's crib..." (Isa 1:3)
Even an animal knows where its bread is buttered, where it gets
blessing and help. But he says, "Not Israel. They don't know where to
go." They are wandering off stupidly, ignorantly, and this amazes him.
He simply cannot understand their stubborn refusal to turn back -- and
the other nations around are just as bad. (Reference)
PARALLELISM
IN PROPHETIC
WRITINGS
Isaiah and other Hebrew prophets
utilized a grammatical tool known as parallelism (description) which is a
manner of comparison. Collins English Dictionary says parallelism is
the repetition of a syntactic
construction in successive sentences for rhetorical effect.
Example of
parallelism
in Scripture...
But let judgment
run down as waters,
and righteousness as a
mighty stream. (KJV,
Amos 5:24)
Achtemeier writes that...
parallelism is a rhetorical device
involving one or more linguistic repetitions or correspondences
(grammatical, lexical, semantic, or phonetic) in adjacent lines or
phrases. While present in prose, parallelism is more prominent in
biblical poetry, where it often appears to be a basic structuring
device. An example is Ps. 103:10: ‘He does not deal with us according
to our sins, nor requite us according to our iniquities.’ In this
verse the syntactic, semantic, and lexical correspondences between the
two phrases are many and obvious (e.g., ‘deal with’/‘requite’;
‘sins’/‘iniquities’; ‘according to’/‘according to’). Other verses may
have fewer correspondences but may still be considered parallel.
(Achtemeier, P. J. Harper's Bible Dictionary. San Francisco: Harper &
Row)
The Pocket Dictionary of
Biblical Studies explains that...
The characteristic of
parallel lines in Hebrew poetry. Parallelism has the effect of saying
the “same in the other” (C. S. Lewis) as a thought or an image in the
initial line is taken up in the subsequent line(s). In the eighteenth
century Robert Lowth identified three forms of parallelism:
synonymous, where the second line reproduces the first; antithetical,
where the second line is in contrast to the first; and synthetic,
where the second line carries the thought of the first forward. Hebrew
poetry is deceptively simple to translate because of this
parallelistic feature, yet the various ways of balancing one line with
another can work on the level of sound, form and even grammatical
structures. Recent studies have focused more on the subtlety of
balancing that takes place between the lines and the necessity of
taking into consideration all the linguistic features, not just the
thought that is paralleled. For example, Job 5:14 reads:
They meet with darkness in the
daytime,
And grope at noonday as in the night.
“Daytime” and “night” are a common
contrasting word pair, and here they occupy the same position in the
Hebrew (first, not last, as in the translation above). However, the
other word pairs—”daytime” and “noonday,” “darkness” and
“night”—occupy opposite positions in the lines but are similar in
meaning (the verbs actually occupy the middle position in each line,
and each line is comprised of only three Hebrew words). The poem
begins with “daytime” and ends with “noonday” but in between lie
“darkness” and “night.” Thus the poem is very tightly and artfully
constructed around similar and contrasting images that parallel one
another. (Patzia, A. G., & Petrotta, A. J. Pocket dictionary of
biblical studies. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press)
Radmacher explains that
The Hebrews used parallelism in
poetry and prophecy as a literary technique to emphasize a particular
thought. Here is an example:
The ox knows its owner
And the donkey its master’s crib;
But (contrast)
Israel does not know,
My people do not consider
(Isaiah 1:3)
In the first part of this verse,
both the ox and the donkey intuitively know the objects that they
depend on, the owner (provider) as well as the “master’s crib”
(provision). The second part of the verse contrasts the intuition of
animals with the behavior of the Israelites. Israel does not know “its
Owner,” and even though they are God’s “people,” they “do not
consider” God’s provision. Thus the second half of the verse creates
the analogy in parallel with the first half.
(Radmacher,
E. D., Allen, R. B., & House, H. W. The Nelson Study Bible: NKJV.
Nashville: Thomas Nelson)
><>><>><>
THE TEACHER IS AN ANIMAL -
"The ox knows its owner...; but Israel does not know, My people do not
consider." -- Isaiah 1:3
Animals sometimes seem to have more sense than people. Because of
their alertness to natural phenomena, they have at times helped us to
avoid disaster.
In northeastern China, officials were able to warn and evacuate people
from high-risk areas hours before a killer earthquake struck. They
were alerted to the disaster by cattle that mooed more than usual and
chickens that refused to roost. And in Japan, 20 small quakes within a
few months were accurately forecast because observers noted that
catfish swam frantically, as if chased by sharks.
From the prophet Isaiah we learn that observing animals can even teach
us how to prevent a ruined
life (Isa 1:2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). He noted that an ox knows its
owner, and a donkey knows where its food comes from (Isa 1:3). These
animals know who takes care of them.
God's people, however, often aren't smart enough to remember their
Owner. Hundreds of years after
Isaiah, the apostle Paul reminded the Corinthian Christians that they
were not their own. They had been bought with a price and were to
honor God in all they said and did (1Cor. 6:19, 20).
Take a lesson from the animals and remember your Owner and Provider.
Live wholeheartedly for Him. -- Martin R. De Haan II
(Our
Daily Bread, Copyright RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI. Reprinted by
permission. All rights reserved)
I am Yours, Lord, yet teach me all
it means,
All it involves of love and loyalty,
Holy service, absolute surrender
And unreserved obedience to Thee. -- Anon.
Live so that others know whom you belong to.
|
|
|
Isaiah
1:4
Alas,
sinful
nation,
people
weighed
down with
iniquity,
offspring of
evildoers,
sons who
act
corruptly! They
have
abandoned the
LORD, they have
despised the
Holy
One of
Israel, they
have
turned
away
from Him. (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
English Translation of
the Greek (Septuagint):
Ah sinful nation, a people full of sins, an evil seed, lawless
children: ye have forsaken the Lord, and provoked the Holy One of
Israel.
Amplified: Ah, sinful nation, a people loaded with
iniquity, offspring of evildoers, sons who deal corruptly! They have
forsaken the Lord, they have despised and shown contempt and provoked
the Holy One of Israel to anger, they have become utterly estranged
(alienated).
(Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
KJV: Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of
evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have forsaken the LORD,
they have provoked the Holy One of Israel unto anger, they are gone
away backward.
NET: The sinful nation is as good as dead, the
people weighed down by evil deeds. They are offspring who do wrong,
children who do wicked things. They have abandoned the LORD, and
rejected the Holy One of Israel. They are alienated from him.
(NET
Bible)
NJB: Disaster, sinful nation, people weighed down with
guilt, race of wrong-doers, perverted children! They have abandoned
Yahweh, despised the Holy One of Israel, they have turned away from
him. (NJB)
NLT: Oh, what a sinful nation they are! They are loaded
down with a burden of guilt. They are evil and corrupt children who
have turned away from the LORD. They have despised the Holy One of
Israel, cutting themselves off from his help.
(NLT
- Tyndale House)
Young's Literal: Ah, sinning nation, a people heavy with
iniquity, A seed of evil doers, sons -- corrupters! They have forsaken
Jehovah, They have despised the Holy One of Israel, They have gone
away backward. |
|
|
Alas, sinful nation, people
weighed down with iniquity: (Isa 1:23; 10:6; 30:9; Genesis
13:13; Matthew 11:28; Acts 7:51,52; Revelation 18:5) (Weighed down -
Isa 57:3,4; Numbers 32:14; Psalms 78:8; Jeremiah 7:26; 16:11,12;
Matthew 3:7; 23:33)
Observe that this indictment
began (Isa 1:2, 3) with God Himself pronouncing the charge against His
people. In this verse, its as if Isaiah like all true prophets can no
longer hold the words within and so he begins his denunciation of the
spiritual sickness of chosen people by crying out "Woe"! Never
pass over a "woe" in the Bible too quickly.
Ask God if Isaiah's century's
old "woe" might also be uttered over the majority of the modern day
church in America!
Keil and Delitzsch
comment that in this verse...
there commences a totally different
rhythm. The words of Jehovah are ended. The piercing lamentation of
the deeply grieved Father is also the severest accusation. The cause
of God, however, is to the prophet the cause of a friend, who feels an
injury done to his friend quite as much as if it were done to himself
(Isa 5:1). The lamentation of God, therefore, is changed now into
violent scolding and threatening on the part of the prophet; and in
accordance with the deep wrathful pain with which he is moved, his
words pour out with violent rapidity, like flash after flash, in
climactic clauses having no outward connection, and each consisting of
only two or three words.
Alas (01945)
(hoy) (pronounced {hoh'ee} - you've probably heard a
Jewish person express this exclamation) is an interjection (word used
in an exclamation) meaning Ho!, Oh!, Ah! or Woe! Hoy is not
just an exclamation, expressing astonishment or pain, but is also an
interjection denouncing threatening or punishment. Our English word alas is an exclamation
expressive of sorrow, grief, pity, concern, apprehension of evil ,
unhappiness, or concern. Woe expresses grief, regret, great sorrow or
distress ("Woe is me!")
Young comments that...
Isaiah is a true evangelist, for a
true evangelist must ever be grieved by sin and by the lost condition
of the sinner to whom he speaks. Such grief flows from a true love for
those who need his message. The condition of the nation brings forth
upon Isaiah’s part a cry of pity that things are as they are, a cry
mixed with indignation against those who could so sin, together with
wonder that men who had received so much from God could so easily turn
against Him in forgetfulness. Words are not sufficient to express
Isaiah’s feelings; he must break forth into an agonizing cry.
Hoy - 47 OT uses - These
uses are almost completely confined to the prophetic writings! Note
the major usage is in Isaiah (21x) - 1Ki 13:30; Is 1:4, 24; 5:8,
11, 18, 20, 21, 22; 10:1, 5; 17:12; 18:1; 28:1; 29:1, 15; 30:1; 31:1;
33:1; 45:9, 10; 55:1; Jer. 22:13, 18; 23:1; 30:7; 34:5; 47:6;
48:1; 50:27; Ezek 13:3, 18; 34:2; Amos 5:18; 6:1; Mic 2:1; Nah 3:1;
Hab 2:6, 9, 12, 15, 19; Zeph 2:5; 3:1; Zec 2:6, 7; 11:17
The
Septuagint (LXX)
translates
hoy with the Greek article of interjection ouai which
expresses extreme displeasure even calling for retributive pain on the
subject, in this case Judah! Uses of ouai in Septuagint - Nu 21:29;
1Sa 4:7f, 21; 1Ki. 12:24; 13:30; Pr 23:29; Eccl. 4:10; 10:16;
Isa. 1:4, 24; 3:9, 11; 5:8, 11, 18, 20, 21, 22; 10:1, 5; 17:12; 18:1;
24:16; 28:1; 29:1, 15; 30:1; 31:1; 33:1; Jer. 4:13; 6:4; 10:19; 13:27;
22:18; 46:19; 48:1; 50:27; 51:2; Lam. 5:16; Ezek. 2:10; 7:26; 13:3,
18; Hos. 7:13; 9:12; Amos 5:16, 18; 6:1; Mic. 7:4; Nah. 3:17; Hab.
2:6, 12, 19; Zeph. 2:5; 3:18
Isaiah first mentions the
unrighteous effects (sinful, etc) and then he identifies the
root causes (abandoned Jehovah, etc). Their evil actions were
the fruit of their willful rejection of Jehovah, the Holy One of
Israel and His Holy Word! (Gal 6:7, 8).
Sinful nation - Literally
this reads the "sinning nation", and the following three clauses
(weighed down with iniquity, offspring of evildoers, sons who act
corruptly) repeat the sense of the first in different words thus
emphasizing Judah's degree of sinfulness. The point is that the
corruption Isaiah describes has "infected" the entire nation, not just
a part of it. The evil humors had become generalized! Woe to such a
nation.
Proverbs states...
Righteousness exalts (morally,
ethically, not economically) a nation, but sin is a disgrace to any
people. (Pr 14:34)
Notice that the charge is
against the entire nation. God obviously holds individuals responsible
for their sins also holds nations responsible
Literally sinful (02398)
(chata) means to "miss the mark" so to speak. Specifically
Judah missed God's target for them which was to be a holy or separated
people (Lev 11:44,45, 19:2, 20:24, 25, 26, Dt 7:6, 26:19, 28:9) which
would be a light to the godless, polytheistic, idolatrous nations who
would be drawn to the one true and living God.
The essence of the Hebrew word
chata is brought in a literal use in Judges...
Out of all these people 700 choice
men were left-handed; each one could sling a stone at a hair and not
miss (chata). (Jdg 20:16)
Israel was to be unique
from all the godless, pagan nations of the world...
And what one nation on the earth is
like Thy people Israel, whom God went to redeem for Himself as a
people and to make a name for Himself, and to do a great thing for
Thee and awesome things for Thy land, before Thy people whom Thou hast
redeemed for Thyself from Egypt, from nations and their gods? For Thou
hast established for Thyself Thy people Israel as Thine own people
forever, and Thou, O Lord, hast become their God. (1Sa 7:23, 24)
What a tragic picture Isaiah
presents in this passage to contrast what Israel should have/could
have been if only they had followed the Master's plans (cp
our potential as believer's
Ep 2:10-note,
2Pe 1:4-note;
Beloved are you redeeming the time
Ep 5:16-note
or wasting your life?)...
|
THEIR PRACTICE |
THEIR POTENTIAL |
|
Sinful nation
|
A holy nation
(Ex 19:6) |
|
A people weighed down with
iniquity |
A people for His own
possession (Dt
14:2) |
|
Offspring of evildoers |
Seed of Abraham
(Ps 105:6, Is 41:8, 44:1,2) |
|
Sons who act corruptly |
Sons of the LORD your God
(Dt 14:1) |
Vine applies this passage
to the modern day church (and to so-called Christian nations like
America) writing...
All this is again admonitory for us
upon whom the very “end of the ages” has come. The description given
concerning us in 1Pe 2:9 (note)
is similar to that given to Israel as God’s people just mentioned: (Ex
19:6). We should therefore take heed lest we fall as they did, lest
there be in any of us “an evil heart of unbelief in departing from (or
that falls away from) the living God." (Heb 3:12-note)”
Weighed down (03515) (kabed)
is an adjective which usually conveys a negative connotation
describing something as heavy and figuratively as burdensome (cp
Moses' cry in Nu 11:14) or grievous.
Sometimes kabed describes a great degree of intensity.
SIN
IS ALWAYS
A HEAVY BURDEN
TO CARRY
Picture the entire nation of Judah
walking around with heavy burdens of sin like a yoke around their
neck, bowed down, crushed and oppressed by the enormous weight of
their accumulated crimes against God! What a striking
picture of sin...like a heavy load on our backs making it difficult to
get around.
Sin is never a "free ride" but always results in a heavy
burden (Pr 28:13 Ps 32:4-note
Ro 3:9-note
Mt 11:29) As you may have heard it said "Sin sits "heavy" on my
conscience." Praise God that He provided a "Sin Bearer" who could
handle the heavy load of sin as described in 1Peter...
and He Himself (Jesus Christ, the
Lamb of God, Jn 1:29) bore our sins in His body on the cross, so that
we might die to
Sin (speaks
of the penalty and the power of sin)
and live to righteousness
(speaks of the power to be holy as He is holy 1Pe 1:15-note)
for by His wounds you were healed (not physical healing as some
incorrectly teach, but spiritual healing of our soul). (1Pe
2:24-note).
Kabed - 3 uses in Isaiah
- Isa. 1:4; 32:2, 36:2
The Septuagint translates
kabed with plethes an adjective that means full, filled up
(as opposed to empty), as one would fill up a hollow vessel. In the NT
plethes is used to described one's soul as thoroughly permeated
(of the Holy Spirit filling us - Lk 4:1, Acts 6:3, 7:55, 11:24). Plethes was used to describe
fully ripened grain (Mk 4:28), which suggests Judah's iniquities were
"full" or "fully ripened" (and ready to be "harvested" - cp Gal
6:6,7).
Motyer adds that this
sinful people
became ‘heavy with iniquity’, as if
the Lord who carried them (Isa 46:3, 4; Ex. 19:4) Himself felt the
burden.
McGee observes that...
Israel is described as “a people
laden with iniquity.” This phrase throws a world of light upon the
personal invitation that the Lord Jesus gave in the New Testament. He
said,“ Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden,
and I will give you rest” (Mt 11:28). Now we know what He meant—“laden
with iniquity.” The people of Israel were laden with sin. Today
His invitation goes out to those who are laden with sin to bring that
burden and load to Him and find rest, the rest of redemption.
(McGee,
J V: Thru the Bible Commentary: Thomas Nelson
or
Logos)
Iniquity (05771)
('avon) describes perversion, from a verb meaning "to bend or
twist." Thus the idea is a twisting of the standard or deviation from
it. 'Avon describes sin as crookedness and perversity in
contrast with chata which is missing the mark.
Isaiah uses 'avon later in
describing the "sin solution" for Judah and for all sinful mankind
because...
All of us like sheep have
gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; but the LORD has
caused the iniquity ('avon) of us all To fall on Him.
Alexander Maclaren
comments that...
In Isa 1:4 the black catalogue of
the prodigal’s doings begins on the surface with what we call ‘moral’
delinquencies, and then digs deeper to disclose the root of these in
what we call ‘religious’ relations perverted. The two are inseparably
united, for no man who is wrong with God can be right with duty or
with men. Notice, too, how one word flashes into clearness the sad
truth of universal experience—that ‘iniquity,’ however it may
delude us into fancying that by it we throw off the burden of
conscience and duty, piles heavier weights on our backs. The doer of
iniquity is ‘laden with iniquity.’ (Isaiah
1:1-9, 16-20 The Great Suit: Jehovah Versus Judah)
Offspring of evildoers,
sons who act corruptly!: (Jeremiah 2:33; Ezekiel 16:33)
Offspring of evildoers -
Children (literally seed) of evil parents (Ed: Note the redeeming power of the
gospel to redeem us from the sinful legacy inherited from our
forefathers! Hallelujah! - 1Pe 1:18-note)
In his first and last (Acts
7:58, 59, 60) great sermon Stephen speaking to the Jews
addressed them in essence as the seed of evildoers declaring...
You men who are stiff-necked
(literally hard neck = obstinate = fixed and unyielding in
course or purpose implying usually an unreasonable persistence) and
uncircumcised in heart (yes they had physical circumcision but that
was useless in regard to salvation - see Ro 2:28, 29-note,
Col 2:11, 12-note)
and ears are always (this means what it says = continually
including in Isaiah's time) resisting (strictly, fall against, rush
against; hence, strive against, oppose: resist by actively opposing
pressure or power) the Holy Spirit; you are doing just as your
fathers did. (offspring of evildoers) Which one of
the prophets did your fathers not persecute? And they killed those who
had previously announced the coming of the Righteous One (Isaiah
prophesied more concerning the Messiah than any other OT prophet and
yet tradition says he was sawn in two!), whose betrayers and murderers
you have now become (Acts 7:51, 52)
Comment: Throughout the
centuries, the majority of the Jews (except the small believing
remnant) had refused to submit to God's will and way and obey the
truth He had revealed to them in His divine acts and Holy Word. Their
ears did not hear the truth, their hearts did not receive the truth,
and their necks did not bow to the truth. As a result, they killed
their own Messiah!
Offspring (02233)
(zera) means seed, issue, progeny, posterity, family. How sad
that this same Hebrew word was used to describe them at their genesis
as the seed of Abraham (eg, see Ge 12:7), but in this verse as
being born to parents who commit evil.
Evildoers (07489)
(ra'a) means be harmful, to be injurious, to do harm or do
hurt.
Remember that neither God nor
His mouthpiece Isaiah found joy in calling the chosen people rebels,
evildoers, etc, but desired that in the hearing of this reproof, they
might come under conviction of their sins and repent and be healed.
C H Spurgeon, as God's mouthpiece in the late 1800's sought a
similar outcome from his preaching...
When Spurgeon preached, hearts
broke. Even the proud, the self-righteous, and hardened rebels
couldn’t resist coming to hear him preach. And then it wasn’t long
before many of them surrendered to his Lord. One afternoon Spurgeon
went to test the acoustics in the Crystal Palace, where he was to
preach the next day. He thundered forth the words of John 1:29,
“Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.”
Little did he realize that a custodian up in one of the balconies
heard those words as a voice from heaven. He came under such
conviction that he had to leave his work and get alone with God. After
a brief season of spiritual struggling, he found peace and life by
beholding the Lamb of God (C. H. Spurgeon Autobiography, The Banner of
Truth Trust)
Spurgeon...
What a terrible picture! A nation
burdened with iniquity, as full of sin as their fathers were, and
their offspring growing up like themselves. By hereditary transmission
(Ro 5:12-note)
they have received a predisposition to evil that cannot be taken out
of the blood except by divine power.
Sons who act corruptly -
Young's Literal says "sons -- corrupters!" What a picture of
the horrible effect of sin. Do not be deceived my beloved brethren by
the deceitfulness of sin (He 3:13-note,
Pr 28:26 Isa 44:20 Obad 1:3 Ro 7:11-note
Ep 4:22-
note Jas 1:14-note
Je 49:16 Titus 3:3-note
2Pe 2:13-note) even the passing "pleasures" of sin (He 11:25-note).
The Lord's charges against Israel are both dramatic and specific.
Act corruptly (07843)
(shachath) means to cause to spoil, putrefy, decay, pervert, come into a state
of ruin. It was used to describe Israelites who worshiped the golden
calf (Ex 32:7; Dt 9:12; 32:5, Hos 9:9). The idea is so to act as to
become destructive to one’s self and to others! This is the very
reason God destroyed the world by a flood!
Now the earth was corrupt
in the sight of God, and the earth was filled with violence. God
looked on the earth, and behold, it was corrupt; for all
flesh had corrupted their way upon the earth. (Ge
6:11-12).(shachath is used 3x)
Shachath - Uses in Isaiah
- Isa 1:4; 11:9; 14:20; 36:10; 37:12; 51:13; 54:16; 65:8, 25
Judges uses this word to
describe Israel's downward progression (sinning is not a static
process but inevitably a downward spiral - Pr 5:22-note)
during the days of the Judges...
But it came about when the judge
died, that they would turn back and act more corruptly (shachath)
than their fathers, in following other gods to serve them and bow down
to them; they did not abandon their practices or their stubborn ways.
(Jdg 2:19)
What the Torah (Pentateuch, first
five books of OT) had predicted would come to pass in
God's chosen people had begun to ripen fully into fruit of
putrefaction (in moral/ethical sense) (see predictions of corrupt
behavior - Dt. 4:16, 25; 31:29).
Alexander Maclaren calls
us to ...
Notice, too, how the awful entail
of evil from parents to children is adduced—shall we say as
aggravating, or as lessening, the guilt of each generation? Isaiah’s
contemporaries are ‘a seed of evil-doers,’ spring from such,
and in their turn are ‘children that are corrupters.’ The fatal
bias becomes stronger as it passes down. Heredity is a fact, whether
you call it original sin or not. (Isaiah
1:1-9, 16-20 The Great Suit: Jehovah Versus Judah)
They have abandoned the
LORD: (Dt 29:25; 31:16; Jdg 10:10; Jer
2:13,17,19)
Israel and Judah's forsaking
of God is unfortunately a common theme in the OT. We all, like Judah,
are either moving toward God (seeking Him) or away from God
(abandoning Him). To abandon God is the opposite of seeking
Him. God Himself predicted that His chosen people would
forsake Him but also warned them that if they did He would forsake them...
And the LORD said to Moses,
"Behold, you are about to lie down with your fathers; and this people
will arise and play the harlot (literally the idea of illicit sexual
activity, but figuratively of describing spiritual unfaithfulness ~
"playing the harlot", cp Ho 4:10, 11, 12, 18, Ex 34:16, 17, 2Chr
21:11, 12, 13) with the strange gods of the land, into the midst of
which they are going, and will forsake ('azab) Me
and break My covenant which I have made with them (she was His "wife"
- Je 31:32, Ho 2:19, Isa 54:5). Then My anger will be kindled against
them in that day, and I will forsake ('azab) them
(cp Dt 28:20, 29:25, Josh 24:20; Who will He not forsake? Ps 9:10,
37:25, 28, Pr 9:6, 28:13) and hide My face from them, and they shall
be consumed, and many evils and troubles shall come upon them; so that
they will say in that day, 'Is it not because our God is not among us
that these evils have come upon us?' (Dt 31:16, 17)
Moses as God's prophet
also warned their abandonment of God would happen
But Jeshurun (means "upright one"
and is a term of endearment and refers ironically to Israel Dt 33:5,
26) grew fat and kicked-- You are grown fat, thick, and sleek-- Then
he forsook ('azab) God who made him, and scorned (nabel
= faded away from, lightly esteemed, dishonored) the Rock of his
salvation. (How did the
forsake and scorn Him?)
They made Him jealous with strange gods; with abominations (tow'ebah =
that which is loathsome) they provoked Him to anger. (Dt 32:15, 16)
Abandoned (05800)
('azab) basically means to depart from something or leave. The
prophets used 'azab to describe Israel's relationship God's
covenant noting that like an unfaithful wife she “forsook” God and His
covenant by turning to lifeless idols (Jdg 2:12, 13, 14, 15-note,
Jdg 10:6, 7,10, 13, 14, When they ask Samuel for a king = 1Sa 8:8,
What happens when we forsake God? = 1Sa 12:10 and 1Ki 9:9, Why
were the 12 tribes divided, esp v33? = 1Ki 11:31, 32, 33, Elijah = 1Ki
19:10,Jer 22:9; Ezek 20:8) As noted above Moses warned God's chosen
people of the danger of breaking God’s covenant (she was His "wife" -
Je 31:32) and forsaking Him (Dt 31:16, 17). Jeremiah indicates the
divine threat of God forsaking His people had become a reality for
Judah (Jer 12:7).
To help understand the meaning
of 'azab see...
Ge 2:24 man shall leave ('azab)
his father and his mother
Ge 39:12 And she caught him by his
garment, saying, "Lie with me!" And he left ('azab) his garment
in her hand and fled, and went outside.
Ru 1:16-note
But Ruth said, "Do not urge me to leave ('azab) (cp who
she had left - Ru 2:11) you or turn back from following you;
for where you go, I will go, and where you lodge, I will lodge. Your
people shall be my people, and your God, my God.
Ps 22:1-note
My God, my God, why hast Thou forsaken ('azab) me?
The Septuagint translates 'azab
with the verb egkataleipo a Greek verb used often in the OT and
which means to desert, to utterly forsake, to totally abandon, all of
these definitions presenting a dramatic picture of Judah's movement away
from God. It was not just a little minimal degree of easily correctable
backsliding but a total abandonment of the Holy One of Israel! (See
quotations on
Backsliding or Drifting)
All uses of 'azab in
Isaiah - Isa 1:4, 28; 7:16; 10:3, 14; 17:2, 9; 18:6; 27:10; 32:14;
41:17; 42:16; 49:14; 54:6, 7; 55:7; 58:2; 60:15; 62:4, 12; 65:11
Alexander Maclaren
writes...
But the bitter fountain of all evil
lies in distorted relations to God. ‘They have forsaken the Lord’;
that is why they ‘do corruptly.’ They have ‘despised the
Holy One of Israel’; that is why they are ‘laden with iniquity.’
Alienated hearts separate from Him. To forsake Him is to despise Him.
To go from Him is to go ‘away backward.’ Whatever may have been our
inheritance of evil, we each go further from Him. And this fatherly
lament over Judah is indeed a wail over every child of man. Does it
not echo in the ‘pearl of parables,’ and may we not suppose that it
suggested that supreme revelation of man’s misery and God’s love? (Isaiah
1:1-9, 16-20 The Great Suit: Jehovah Versus Judah)
Spurgeon writes that...
the prophet spoke to the people of
his day, and we may say much the same to the people of our own time.
The professing church of God has gone away backward, forsaken the
doctrines of truth, and turned aside from the purity of its life. God
have mercy upon the world when the church itself becomes thus defiled!
They have despised the Holy
One of Israel: (Isa 3:8; 65:3; Deut
32:19; Ps 78:40; Jeremiah 7:19; 1Co 10:22)
2Ki 19:22 ‘Whom have you reproached
and blasphemed? And against whom have you raised your voice, And
haughtily lifted up your eyes? Against the Holy One of Israel!
Ps 78:41-note
Again and again they tempted God, and pained the Holy One of Israel.
We see a similar description of
Israel again in Isaiah 5...
Isaiah 5:24 Therefore, as a tongue
of fire consumes stubble and dry grass collapses into the flame, so
their root will become like rot and their blossom blow away as dust; (Why?)
For they have rejected (refused, abhorred, as in 1Sa 10:19, Je 8:9)
the law of the LORD of hosts and despised (naats =
spurned, treated contemptuously) the word of the Holy One of Israel.
Comment: Israel rejected the
Holy One and the Holy One eventually rejected them in Hosea 4:6 as
well as their worship in Amos 4:6! Beware of "dwelling" (wallowing
would be a better description) in sin. It's like the poor children in
third world countries playing in the sewage infested streams that run
through the villages! Let us confess and repent lest we experience the
same fate as Israel!
Motyer writes that...
Just as ‘seeking’ (God) is not
looking for Him as though He were lost but showing a determination to
be with Him where He is to be found (cp Je 29:13, He 11:6-note),
so forsaking is deliberately distancing ourselves from Him. It arises
from a change of heart whereby He who should be loved is rather
spurned/‘treated with scorn. (Motyer, J. A. The Prophecy of Isaiah :
An Introduction & Commentary. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press)
Despised (05006)
(na'ats) signifies the action or attitude whereby the former
recipient of favorable disposition and/or service is consciously
viewed and/or treated with disdain (cp Dt 31:20). It means to abhor
which in turn means to regard with extreme repugnance. Ponder that
thought...this is how God's very own people were interacting with the
Holy One of Israel! When we turn away from God, it's amazing how far
we can slide! Have you
despised the Holy One of Israel by your unholy behavior? Are you
trifling with some "little" sin even now as you read these notes? If you
are, then you had better beware that you are on the proverbial "slippery
slope" and you need to repent and return and experience God's
restoration and rest.
TO
NOT BE HOLY
IS TO DESPISE
THE HOLY ONE!
Na'ats also conveys the
idea of spurning (men spurning God) which means to reject
something disdainfully or contemptuously. Na'ats equates with
unbelief in Numbers 14 (Why is their spurning God all the more
shocking? What had they witnessed? = Nu 14:11, 23).
Keil and Delitzsch write
that...
There was apostasy in heart: “They
have forsaken Jehovah.” There was apostasy in words: “They
blaspheme the Holy One of Israel.” The verb (blaspheme, spurn,
despise =
na'ats)
literally means to sting, then to mock or treat scornfully; the use of
it to denote blasphemy is antiquated Mosaic (Dt. 31:20; Nu 14:11, 23;
16:30).
The Septuagint translates
na'ats with the verb parorgizo which means to provoke to anger
and usually describes God's reaction (cp parorgizo in Dt 4:25, 31:29,
32:21)
The Theological Wordbook has
this note on na'ats...
God's longsuffering (Ro 2:4-note)
overlooked repeated rejections and scorning of His person (Nu
14:11; Ps 10:3-note),
sanctions (Ps 10:13-note),
counsel (Ps 107:11-note),
and word (Isa 5:24). To the "despiser" nothing that is God's is
considered holy (Isa 52:5; cf. Isa 1:4; Deut 31:19). Thus, he not only
"deprecates God's power and ability to carry out his threats" but his
contemptuous view of God leads him to prefer sin to God and to express
this contempt in conscious contempt of God (Isa 1:4).
(Harris,
R L, Archer, G L & Waltke, B K Theological Wordbook of the Old
Testament. Page 543 Moody Press)
Despite such unholy behavior
against the Holy One note His longsuffering...
For neither Israel nor Judah has
been forsaken by his God, the Lord of hosts, although their land is
full of guilt before the Holy One of Israel. (Je 51:5)
Holy One of Israel - This
phrase is used 25 times in Isaiah (2Ki 19:22; Ps. 71:22; 78:41;
89:18; Isa. 1:4; 5:19, 24; 10:20; 12:6; 17:7; 29:19; 30:11, 12, 15;
31:1; 37:23; 41:14, 16, 20; 43:3, 14; 45:11; 47:4; 48:17; 49:7; 54:5;
55:5; 60:9, 14; Jer. 50:29; 51:5) and clearly points to the Messiah.
Furthermore this title for God occurs 12 times in the first division
of Isaiah and 13 times in the second division. This and other
similarities in usage of distinctive Hebrew words or phrases adds
further proof to the unified authorship of the entire book.
What a contrast this name of God
brings out in this verse where the holiness of God stands in the
sharpest possible contrast to human sinfulness.
Keil and Delitzsch add
that...
It is with intention that God
is designated here as “the Holy One of Israel,”—a name which
constitutes the keynote of all Isaiah’s prophecy (see Isa 6:3). It was
sin to mock at anything holy; it was a double sin to mock at God, the
Holy One; but it was a threefold sin for Israel to mock at God the
Holy One, Who had set Himself to be the sanctifier of Israel, and
required that as He was Israel’s sanctification, He should also be
sanctified by Israel according to His holiness (Lev 19:2, etc.).
Vine writes that...
as the Holy One He was Israel’s
Sanctifier, and they should have sanctified themselves in response; He
had said “ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God, am holy” (Lev.
19:2).
(Vine,
W. Collected writings of W. E. Vine. Nashville: Thomas Nelson
or
Logos)
Motyer adds that...
Holiness is the heart of the nature
of God. Thus, in the full reality of all that makes him divine and
marks him out as unique he had drawn near to and in a real sense
become the possession of Israel, he was ‘Israel’s Holy One’. This was
the one they had treated with scorn. (Ibid)
They have turned away from Him:
(Psalms 58:3; Jer 2:5,31)
Literally this verse reads that
they "have be-stranged themselves backward" or as Motyer phrases it
they had "turned themselves back into strangers."
Spurgeon...
What a description this is of the
state of the unregenerate, — even of God’s elect among them who are
still crushed under the ruins of the fall! Peradventure, as I am
reading this chapter, some poor soul here is saying, “That just
describes me.” Well, let it describe you; and lament, and mourn, and
humiliate yourself before the Most High as you realize what is your
sad condition. You have acted worse to God than an ass does to its
master; you have behaved shamefully to him, and thus you have provoked
him to anger. Do not think lightly of your sin, but let it weigh
heavily upon your spirit; as you are “laden with iniquity,” God
grant that it may be a heavy burden to you!
The Lord next goes on to exhibit
the sin of the people in the light of his chastisement (Isa 1:4b).
When a child sins, and does wrong, a wise parent uses correction to
see whether he cannot overcome the evil tendencies; but, alas! there
is no correction that will ever get sin out of the sinner. See what
God did with these people, and what came of it.
Keil and Delitzsch add
that...
lastly, there was also
apostasy in action: “they have turned away backwards;"... The
niphal (Ed: This Hebrew stem is often reflexive), which is only
met with here, indicates the deliberate character of their
estrangement from God; and the expression is rendered still more
emphatic by the introduction of the word “backwards” (achor).
In all their actions they ought to have followed Jehovah; but they
had turned their backs upon Him, and taken the way selected by
themselves. (Comment: Cp Acts 7:51 where Stephen describes
the unregenerate Jews - "resisting" in Greek means to resist by
actively opposing or rush against or upon in a hostile manner,
assault, resist by force and violence - in Ac 7:51 "the Holy Spirit")
Turned away - The KJV
renders it "gone away backward" (Back side of something,
backward, behind = Hebrew
word - 'achor =0268), a good description of "backsliding"
(See quotations on
Backsliding or Drifting).
The noun 'achor is used
by Jeremiah to picture backsliding which pertains to a state of little
or no association compared to a prior association...
“You who have forsaken Me,”
declares the Lord, “You keep going backward. So I will stretch
out My hand against you and destroy you; I am tired of relenting! (Jer
15:6) Turned away (02114)
(zur) actually means to be a stranger and thus the idea in the
present context is to become alienated or utterly estranged from God.
God's people had become as if they were now aliens, foreigners or
non-Israelites. Motyer says "God’s chosen people have ‘reverted to
alien status’." The Hebrew
uses the Niphal stem here which can be reflexive which could be
rendered "They turned themselves away". Their turning away was no
accident and they had no one to blame but themselves. We all need to
beware of the "victim mentality" and remember that God never tempts us
to sin, but when we sin, it is because we have made a personal
decision to sin rather than to obey. This verse describes every
person ever born for we are all born into Adam (Ro 5:12-note),
Paul explaining that the result is that we...
were formerly alienated and hostile
in mind, engaged in evil deeds, yet He has now reconciled you in His
fleshly body through death (2Co 5:18, 19, Ep 2:14-note,
Ep 2:15, 16-note),
in order to present you before Him holy (Ep 1:4-note)
and blameless (1Co 1:8, Jude 1:24, 25) and beyond reproach (Ro 8:33-note)
(Col 1:21, 22-note)
Paul describes the mind that is
alienated to God...
For the mind set on the flesh is
death, but the mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, because the
mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject
itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so; (Ro 8:6,
7-note)
What happens when we turn away
from God? Jeremiah writes...
Thus says the LORD, "What injustice
did your fathers find in Me, That they went far from Me and walked
after emptiness and became empty (Hebrew verb habal =
they became filled with false hopes, became vain or void [How
would you like God to examine everything you've ever lived for,
everything you've ever accomplished and after assessing it, stamp it
"Void"!?], cp 2Ki 17:15,
Ps 62:10)? (Jeremiah 2:5)
McGee notes that here in
Isaiah 1:2, 3, 4...
God spells out Israel’s condition.
They are backslidden, they have turned away from God, and they are a
people laden with iniquity. Now He is going to spell out in detail the
charge that He has made against them.
|
|
|