|















| |
|
COLLECTIONS
Commentaries,
Word Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Albert Barnes
Commentary Notes
On Nehemiah |
Nehemiah 1
Nehemiah 1:1. The words of Nehemiah the son of Hachaliah The
prophetical books commence generally with a title of this kind
(see Jeremiah 1:1); but no other extant historical book begins
thus. Nehemiah, while attaching his work to Ezra, perhaps marked
in this manner the point at which his own composition commenced.
(See the introduction of the Book of Nehemiah.)
Chisleu The ninth
month, corresponding to the end of November and beginning of
December.
In the twentieth year
i.e. of Artaxerxes Longimanus (465-425 B.C.). Compare Nehemiah
2:1.
Shushan the palace
Compare Esther 1:2,5, etc.; Daniel 8:2. Shushan, or Susa, was the
ordinary residence of the Persian kings. “The palace” or acropolis
was a distinct quarter of the city, occupying an artificial
eminence.
Nehemiah 1:2. Hanani
seems to have been an actual brother of Nehemiah (Nehemiah 7:2).
Nehemiah 1:3. The
attempt to rebuild the wall in the time of the Pseudo-Smerdis
(Ezra 4:12-24) had been stopped. It still remained in ruins. The
Assyrian sculptures show that it was the usual practice to burn
the gates.
Nehemiah 1:4. The God
of heaven This title of the Almighty, which is Persian rather than
Jewish (see 2 Chronicles 36:23; Ezra 1:2 note; 6:10; 7:12,21), is
a favorite one with Nehemiah, who had been born and brought up in
Persia.
Nehemiah 1:11. A
Persian king had numerous cup-bearers, each of whom probably
discharged the office in his turn. |
|
Nehemiah 2
Nehemiah 2:1. Nisan was
the name given by the Persian Jews to the month previously called
“Abib,” the first month of the Jewish year, or that which followed
the vernal equinox. It fell four months after Chisleu (Nehemiah
1:1).
The twentieth year As
Artaxerxes ascended the throne in 465 B.C., his 20th year would
correspond to 445-444 B.C. (See related study on
Daniel's Seventieth Week
and expository
commentary on
Daniel 9:24
25
26
27)
Nehemiah 2:2. I was
very sore afraid A Persian subject was expected to be perfectly
content so long as he had the happiness of being with his king. A
request to quit the court was thus a serious matter.
Nehemiah 2:3. The
city ... of my fathers’ sepulchres We may conclude from this that
Nehemiah was of the tribe of Judah, as Eusebius and Jerome say
that he was.
Nehemiah 2:4. I
prayed to the God of heaven Mentally and momentarily, before
answering the king.
Nehemiah 2:6. The
queen Though the Persian kings practiced polygamy, they always had
one chief wife, who alone was recognized as “queen.” The chief
wife of Longimanus was Damaspia.
I set him a time
Nehemiah appears to have stayed at Jerusalem twelve years from his
first arrival (Nehemiah 5:14); but he can scarcely have mentioned
so long a term to the king. Probably his leave of absence was
prolonged from time to time.
Nehemiah 2:8. The
king’s forest Rather, park. The word used (pardes)(H6508); compare
paradeisov , found only here, in Ecclesiastes 2:5, and in
Song 4:13), is of Persian, or at any rate of Aryan origin. The
Persians signified by pariyadeza a walled enclosure, ornamented
with trees, either planted or of natural growth, and containing
numerous wild animals. The “paradise” here mentioned must have
been in the neighborhood of Jerusalem, and may have corresponded
to the earlier “gardens of Solomon.”
The palace Rather,
“the fortress.” The word in the original has the double meaning of
“palace” and “fortress,” the fact being that in ancient times
palaces were always fortified. “The fortress which pertained to
the house (temple)” is first spoken of here. Under the Romans it
was called “Antonia.”
Nehemiah 2:10. The
name Sanballat is probably Babylonian the first element being the
same which commences “Sennacherib,” namely, “Sin,” the moon-God,
and the second balatu, “eminent”(?), which is found in the
Assyrian name, Bel-balatu. As a Horonite, he was probably a native
of one of the Bethhorons, the upper or the lower (see Joshua
16:3,5; 2 Chronicles 8:5), and therefore born within the limits of
the old kingdom of Samaria. Tobiah seems to have been an Ammonite
slave, high in the favor of Sanballat, whom he probably served as
secretary (Nehemiah 6:17-19) and chief adviser.
It grieved them
Compare Ezra 4:4-24; 5:6-17. The revival of Jerusalem as a great
and strong city, which was Nehemiah’s aim, was likely to interfere
with the prosperity, or at any rate the eminence, of Samaria.
Nehemiah 2:13. The
gate of the valley A gate opening on the valley of Hinnom, which
skirted Jerusalem to the west and south. The exact position is
uncertain; as is also that of “the dragon well.”
The dung port The
gate by which offal and excrements were conveyed out of the city,
and placed eastward of the valley-gate.
Nehemiah 2:14. The
gate of the fountain A gate on the eastern side of the Tyropoeon
valley, not far from the pool of Siloam (probably “the king’s
pool.” (Compare Nehemiah 3:15).
Nehemiah 2:15. The
brook The Kidron watercourse, which skirted the city on the east.
Turned back i.e. he
turned westward, and having made the circuit of the city,
re-entered by the valley-gate.
Nehemiah 2:16. The
rulers The principal authorities of the city, in the absence of
the special governor.
The rest that did the
work i.e. “the laboring class that (afterward) actually built
the wall.”
Nehemiah 2:18. The
king’s words These have not been given; but the royal permission
to restore the walls is implied in Nehemiah 2:5,6.
Nehemiah 2:19. Geshem
the Arabian The discovery that Sargon populated Samaria in part
with an Arab colony explains why Arabs should have opposed the
fortification of Jerusalem. |
|
Nehemiah 3
Nehemiah 3:1. Eliashib
(compare the marginal reference) was the grandson of Joshua, the
high priest contemporary with Zerubbabel.
The sheep gate This
was a gate in the eastern wall, not far from the pool of Bethesda,
marginal reference, which was perhaps originally a sheep-pool.
The exact line which the
writer follows in describing the circuit of the wall will probably
be always a matter of dispute. According to the view here taken,
the line described commences near the pool of Bethesda, on the
east of the city, and is traced thence, first, northward, then
westward, then southward, and finally eastward, as far as the pool
of Siloam (Nehemiah 3:15). From this point, it seems to the writer
of this note that the line of the outer wall is not followed, but,
instead of this, the inner wall of the “city of David,” which
included the temple, is traced. This wall is followed northward
from the pool of Siloam, past the “sepulchres of David” and
Hezekiah’s pool to the “armoury” (Nehemiah 3:19) at its northwest
corner; it is then followed eastward to “the tower which lieth out
from the king’s house” (Nehemiah 3:25); from this it is carried
southward, along the western edge of the Kidron valley to the
“great tower which lieth out” (Nehemiah 3:27), and then
southwestward to the point at which it commenced near Siloam
(Nehemiah 3:27). The special wall of the “city of David” being
thus completed, the writer finishes his entire account by filling
up the small interval between the northeast angle of this
fortification and the “sheep-gate” (Nehemiah 3:28-32), from which
he started.
They sanctified it
The priests commenced the work with a formal ceremony of
consecration. When the work was completed, there was a solemn
dedication of the entire circuit (see Nehemiah 12:27-43).
The tower of Hananeel
is often mentioned; that of Meah, or rather Hammeah, or “the
Hundred,” in Nehemiah only. Both towers must have been situated
toward the northeastern corner of the city.
Nehemiah 3:2. The
people of each provincial town were set to work for the most part
on the portion of the wall nearest their city. Thus, “the men of
Jericho,” were employed at the northeast corner of Jerusalem.
Nehemiah 3:3. The
fish gate The gate through which fish from the Jordan and the
Sea of Galilee entered Jerusalem; a gate in the north wall, a
little to the east of the modern Damascus gate.
Locks The word used
(here and in Nehemiah 3:6,13-15) is thought to mean rather a
“cross-bar” than a lock, while that translated “bars” is regarded
as denoting the “hooks” or “catches” which held the cross-bar at
its two ends.
Nehemiah 3:5. Tekoites See 2 Samuel 14:2 note.
Nehemiah 3:6. The
old gate Either the modern Damascus gate, the main entrance to
the city on the north side; or a gate a little further eastward.
Nehemiah 3:7
Unto the throne ... The meaning is thought to be “the men of
Gibeon and Mizpah, who, though they worked for Nehemiah, were not
under his government, but belonged to the jurisdiction of the
governor on this side the river.”
Nehemiah 3:11. The
other piece Rather, “another piece” (as in Nehemiah
3:19,21,27,30). It is conjectured that a verse has fallen out in
which Malchijah’s and Hashub’s “first piece” was mentioned.
The tower of the furnaces
Either a tower at the northwestern angle of the city; or, midway
in the western wall. The origin of the name is uncertain.
Nehemiah 3:13.
Zanoah lay west of Jerusalem, at the distance of about 10
miles (Joshua 15:34 note).
Nehemiah 3:15. The “pool
of Siloah” lies at the southwestern foot of the temple hill,
near the lower end of the Tyropoeon. It appears to have been at
all times beyond the line of the city wall, but was perhaps joined
to the city by a fortification of its own.
The king’s gardens
See 2 Kings 25:4.
The stairs A flight
of steps, still to be seen, led from the low valley of the
Tyropoeon up the steep sides of Ophel to the “city of David,”
which it reached probably at a point not far south of the temple.
Nehemiah 3:16. Beth-zur
Now Beit-sur, on the road from Jerusalem to Hebron (Joshua 15:58).
By “the sepulchres of
David” must be understood the burial place in which David and
the kings his descendants to the time of Hezekiah were interred.
This was an excavation in the rock, in the near vicinity of the
temple (Ezekiel 43:7-9), and on its western side. The position of
the burial-place was well known until the destruction of the city
by Titus; but modern research has not yet discovered it.
The pool Probably
that made by Hezekiah in the Tyropoeon valley, west of the temple
area (marginal reference).
Nehemiah 3:17-30. The
constant mention of “priests,” “Levites,” and Nethinims,”
sufficiently indicates that the writer is here concerned with the
sacerdotal quarter, that immediately about the temple.
Nehemiah 3:18.
Bavai Or, “Binnui” (Nehemiah 3:24; 10:9).
The armoury at the turning
of the wall literally, “the armoury of the corner.” The
northwestern corner of the special wall of the “city of David”
seems to be intended. See Nehemiah 3:1 note.
Nehemiah 3:20. The other
piece Rather, “another piece.” The notice of Baruch’s first
piece, like that of Malchijah’s and Hashub’s (Nehemiah 3:11),
seems to have slipped out of the text.
Nehemiah 3:22. The
word here translated “plain” is applied in the rest of
Scripture almost exclusively to the Ghor or Jordan valley.
Compare, however, Nehemiah 12:28.
Nehemiah 3:24. The
turning of the wall The northeastern angle of the “city of
David” seems here to be reached. At this point a tower “lay out”
(Nehemiah 3:25), or projected extraordinarily, from the wall,
being probably a watch-tower commanding the Kidron valley and all
the approaches to the city from the southeast, the east, and the
northeast.
Nehemiah 3:25. The “king’s
high house” is almost certainly the old palace of David, which
was on the temple hill, and probably occupied a position directly
north of the temple.
That was by the court of the
prison Prisons were in old times adjuncts of palaces. The palace
of David must have had its prison; and the “prison gate” (Nehemiah
12:39) was clearly in this quarter.
Nehemiah 3:26. The
marginal reading is better. On the Nethinims see 1 Chronicles 9:2
note.
Ophel was the slope
south of the temple (see the marginal reference “y” note); and the
water-gate, a gate in the eastern wall, either for the escape of
the superfluous water from the temple reservoirs, or for the
introduction of water from the Kidron valley when the reservoirs
were low.
Nehemiah 3:27. The
foundations of an outlying tower near the southeast angle of the
temple area in this position have been recently discovered.
Nehemiah 3:28. “The
horse gate” was on the east side of the city, overlooking the
Kidron valley. It seems to have been a gate by which horses
approached and left the old palace, that of David, which lay north
of the temple (Nehemiah 3:25).
Nehemiah 3:31. The gate
Miphkad Not elsewhere mentioned. It must have been in the
east, or northeast, wall, a little to the south of the
“sheep-gate” |
|
Nehemiah 4
Nehemiah 4:4. The
parenthetical prayers of Nehemiah form one of the most striking
characteristics of his history. Here we have the first. Other
examples are Nehemiah 5:19; 6:9,14; 13:14,22,29,31.
Nehemiah 4:6. Unto
the half thereof i.e. to half the intended height.
Nehemiah 4:7. The
Arabians ... Probably a band, composed largely of Arabians,
Ammonites, and Ashdodites, which Sanballat maintained as a guard
to his person, and which formed a portion of “the army of Samaria”
(Nehemiah 4:2). A quarrel between such a band and the people of
Jerusalem might be overlooked by the Persian king.
Nehemiah 4:9. Because of
them Or, “over against them,” i.e. opposite to the place where
they were encamped, probably on the north side of the city.
Nehemiah 4:12. Ten times
i.e. repeatedly.
From all places ...
Better as in the margin. The Jews who dwelt on the Samaritan
border, came to Jerusalem and tried to withdraw their contingents
of workmen from the work, representing to them the impending
danger, and saying, “You must return to your homes, and so escape
it.”
Nehemiah 4:13. The lower
places The places where those within the walls had the least
advantage of elevation, the naturally weak places, where an enemy
was likely to make his attack.
Nehemiah 4:16. Habergeons
Or, “coats of mail.” Coats of mail were common in Assyria from the
ninth century B.C., and in Egypt even earlier. They were made of
thin laminae of bronze or iron, sewn upon leather or linen, and
overlapping one another.
Nehemiah 4:22. Let every
one ... lodge within Jerusalem i.e. Let none return to
his own village or city at night, but let all take their rest in
Jerusalem.”
Nehemiah 4:23. Saving ...
The text here is probably unsound. It yields no satisfactory
sense. See the margin. |
|
Nehemiah 5
Nehemiah 5:2. Are many A
slight emendation brings this verse into exact parallelism with
the next, and gives the sense — “We have pledged our sons and our
daughters, that we might get corn, and eat and live.” Compare
Nehemiah 5:5.
Nehemiah 5:4. The king’s
tribute The tax payable to the Persian monarch (compare Ezra
4:13; Esther 10:1). In ancient times, heavy taxation was often
productive of debt and distress.
Nehemiah 5:5. The
power of a father to sell his daughter into slavery is expressly
mentioned in the Law (Exodus 21:7). The power to sell a son
appears from this passage. In either case, the sale held good for
only six years, or until the next year of jubilee (see the
marginal references).
Nehemiah 5:7. Ye exact
usury The phrase is unique to Nehemiah, and is best explained
by the context, which shows the practice of the rich Jews at the
time to have been not so much to lend on usury as to lend on
mortgage and pledge.
Nehemiah 5:8.
Nehemiah contrasts his own example with that of the rich Jews. He
had spent money in redeeming some countrymen in servitude among
the pagan; they were causing others to be sold into slavery among
the Jews.
Nehemiah 5:10. I ...
might exact Nehemiah had lent, but not upon pledge.
Nehemiah 5:11. The
hundredth part of the money ... i.e. the interest. It is
conjectured that the 100th part was payable monthly, or, in other
words, that interest was taken at the rate of twelve per cent. The
Law altogether disallowed the taking of interest from Israelites
(see Exodus 22:25; Leviticus 25:36, etc.).
Nehemiah 5:13. I shook my
lap Compare the marginal references. By “lap” is meant a fold
in the bosom of the dress, capable of serving as a pocket. Compare
Isaiah 49:22 margin.
Nehemiah 5:14. Have not
eaten the bread of the governor i.e. “have not, like other
Persian governors, lived at the expense of the people under my
government.” See Ezra 4:14 note.
Nehemiah 5:15. Forty
shekels of silver A daily sum from the entire province. For
such a table as that kept by Nehemiah (Nehemiah 5:18), this would
be a very moderate payment.
Nehemiah 5:16. I
continued ... land i.e. — “ I took my share in the work of the
wall, as general superintendent. I did not take advantage of the
general poverty to buy poor men’s plots of ground.”
Nehemiah 5:18.
Compare the far grander provision for Solomon’s table (see the
marginal reference). |
|
Nehemiah 6
Nehemiah 6:1. Upon the gates
Rather, “in the gates.” This work would naturally be delayed until
the last phase.
Nehemiah 6:2. The
choice made of Ono, on the skirts of Benjamin, 25 or 30 miles from
Jerusalem, as the meeting-place, was, no doubt, in order to draw
Nehemiah to a distance from his supporters, that so an attack
might be made on him with a better chance of success.
Nehemiah 6:5. The
letter was “open,” in order that the contents might be generally
known, and that the Jews, alarmed at the threats contained in it,
might refuse to continue the work.
Nehemiah 6:10. Who was
shut up On account, probably, of some legal uncleaness.
Compare Jeremiah 36:5.
Nehemiah 6:11. Would
go into the temple to save his life Rather “could go into the
temple and live.” For a layman to enter the sanctuary was a
capital offence (see Numbers 18:7).
Nehemiah 6:12. The
existence of a party among the Jews who sided with Sanballat and
lent themselves to his schemes, is here for the first time
indicated. Compare Nehemiah 6:14,17-19; 13:4,5,28.
Nehemiah 6:14.
Noadiah is not elsewhere mentioned. The examples of Miriam,
Deborah, Huldah, and Anna, show that the prophetical gift was
occasionally bestowed upon women (2 Kings 22:14 note).
Nehemiah 6:15.
Elul The sixth month, corresponding to the latter part of
August and the beginning of September.
In fifty and two days
Josephus states that the repairs of the wall occupied two years
and four months. But Nehemiah’s narrative is thoroughly consistent
with itself, and contains in it nothing that is improbable. The
walls everywhere existed at the time that he commenced his task,
and only needed repairs. The work was partitioned among at least
37 working parties, who labored simultaneously, with material
ready at hand; and, notwithstanding all menaces, uninterruptedly.
Nehemiah 6:18. Though
Tobiah is called “the servant” or “slave” (Nehemiah 2:10,19), and
was perhaps a bought slave of Sanballat’s, yet he was in such a
position that Jewish nobles readily contracted affinity with him.
This is quite in harmony with the practice of the East, where
slaves often fill high positions and make great marriages. |
|
Nehemiah 7
Nehemiah 7:1. Since the
watch of the temple had hitherto been kept by porters, singers,
and Levites (1 Chronicles 26:1-19), so now the watch of the entire
city was committed to men of the same three classes, their
experience pointing them out as the most suitable persons.
Nehemiah 7:2. My brother
Hanani See Nehemiah 1:2.
The ruler of the palace Or,
“the governor of the fortress.” See the marginal reference note.
He i.e. Hananiah.
Nehemiah 7:3. Until the
sun be hot An unusual precaution. The ordinary practice in the
East is to open town gates at sunrise.
Nehemiah 7:4. The people
were few The number of those who returned with Zerubbabel was
no more than 42,360 (Nehemiah 7:66). Less than 2,000 people had
come with Ezra (Ezra 8:1-20).
Nehemiah 7:5. It is
argued by some that the entire catalogue which follows (Nehemiah
7:7-73) is not the register of them “which came up `at the
first’,” but of the Jewish people in Nehemiah’s time. Nehemiah 7:7
and Ezra 2:2 are, however, very positive in their support of the
usual view; and some of the arguments against it are thought to be
met by considering the Nehemiah of Nehemiah 7:7 and Ezra 2:2 a
person different from Nehemiah the governor; and “Tirshatha” an
official title likely to have belonged to others besides Nehemiah
(see the Ezra 2:63 note.)
Nehemiah 7:70-73.
Compared with Ezra 2:69 there is considerable difference between
the totals for gold, silver, and garments. The usual explanation
is that of corruption in the one or the other of the passages.
Nehemiah 7:73.
Dwelt in their cities Nehemiah’s quotation from Zerubbabel’s
register ends here, and the narration of events in Jerusalem in
his own day is resumed from Nehemiah 7:3. The narrative (Nehemiah
8; 10) appears from internal evidence to be by a different author
(see the introduction of the Book of Nehemiah).
The last two clauses of
Nehemiah 7:73 should stand as the beginning of Nehemiah 8 (as in
the Septuagint). The text would then run: “And when the seventh
month was come, and the children of Israel were in their cities,
the whole people gathered themselves together as one man,” etc.
Compare the margin reference. |
|
Nehemiah 8
Nehemiah 8:1. The
street Rather, “the square” or “court.” So in Nehemiah 8:16
(compare Ezra 10:9). The court seems to have been one between the
eastern gate of the temple and the watergate in the city-wall. It
would thus lie within the modern Haram area.
Ezra the scribe This
is the first mention of Ezra in the present book, and the first
proof we have had that he was contemporary with Nehemiah. Probably
he returned to the court of Artaxerxes soon after effecting the
reforms which he relates in Ezra 10, and did not revisit Jerusalem
until about the time when the walls were completed, or after an
absence of more than ten years. It was natural for the people to
request him to resume the work of exposition of the Law to which
he had accustomed them on his former visit (Ezra 7:10,25).
Nehemiah 8:2. Upon the
first day of the seventh month The day of the “Feast of
Trumpets” (see the margin reference note). The gathering together
of the people, spoken of in Nehemiah 8:1, was probably to observe
this feast.
Nehemiah 8:4. The 13
persons mentioned were probably the chief priests of the course
(shift) which was at the time performing the temple service.
Nehemiah 8:5. Stood up
The attitude of attention and respect. Compare the existing
practice of the Christian Church at the reading of the Gospel for
the day.
Nehemiah 8:7. The
names here (and in Nehemiah 9:4,5; Nehemiah 10:9) seem not to be
the personal appellations of individuals, but rather designations
of Levitical families, the descendants respectively of Jeshua,
etc., who lived not later than the time of Zerubbabel (Nehemiah
7:43; 12:8).
Nehemiah 8:8. Gave
the sense Either by rendering the Hebrew into the Aramaic
dialect, or perhaps simply by explaining obscure words or
passages.
Caused them to understand Either “they (the people) understood
what was read;” or, “they (the Levites) expounded as they read.”
Nehemiah 8:9.
Nehemiah, which is the Tirshatha Hereto, Nehemiah has called
himself pechah(h6346) (Nehemiah 5:14,15,18), which is the ordinary
word for “governor.” Now for the first time he is called `the
Tirshatha’“ (see Ezra 2:63 note.)
The people wept ...
Because the Law brought vividly before them their sins of omission
and commission. In Nehemiah 8:10 the Jews were not forbidden to be
sorry for their sins, but they were only prohibited from marring a
festive occasion with the expression of their sorrow.
Nehemiah 8:10. The
“sending of portions” to the poor is not distinctly mentioned in
any but the later historical Scriptures (compare the margin
reference). The practice naturally grew out of this injunction of
the Law (Deuteronomy 16:11,14).
Nehemiah 8:13. To
understand Rather, “to consider.”
Nehemiah 8:14. The
Feast of tabernacles had fallen into abeyance either entirely, or
as regarded the dwelling in booths (Nehemiah 8:17), since the time
when it was kept by Zerubbabel (Ezra 3:4). It is evident that the
observance of the Law, impossible during the captivity, was
restored slowly and with difficulty after the return.
Nehemiah 8:15. The mount
The “mount of Olives” is probably intended.
Pine branches
Rather, “branches of the wild olive.” The actual trees named by
the Law may have become scarce. It was probably considered that
the spirit of the command was kept if branches of trees similar in
general character to those named in Leviticus were employed.
Nehemiah 8:17. It is
not the intention of the writer to state that the Feast of
tabernacles had not been kept from the time of Joshua until this
occasion (see 1 Kings 8:2,65; Ezra 3:4); but that there had been
no such celebration as this since Joshua’s time. Compare 2 Kings
23:22; 2 Chronicles 35:18. |
|
Nehemiah 9
Nehemiah 9:1. The
festival lasted from the 15th day of the 7th month to the first.
The 22nd day was a day of solemn observance (Nehemiah 8:18). One
day seems to have been allowed the people for rest; and then the
work of repentance, for which they had shown themselves ready
(Nehemiah 8:9), was taken in hand, and a general fast was
proclaimed.
Nehemiah 9:4. The
Septuagint and the Vulgate remove the comma after “stairs.” By the
“stairs (or scaffold) of the Levites” is to be understood as an
elevated platform from which they could the better address and
lead the people (compare Nehemiah 8:4).
Nehemiah 9:5. Stand up
The people had knelt to confess and to worship God (Nehemiah 9:3).
They were now to take the proper attitude for praise. Compare
throughout the margin reference.
Nehemiah 9:6. The host of
heaven worshippeth thee i.e the angels. See 1 Kings 22:19;
Psalm 103:21.
Nehemiah 9:17. In their
rebellion The Septuagint and several manuscripts have “in
Egypt” (the words in the original differing by one letter only),
and translate — “ And appointed a captain to return to their
bondage in Egypt.” Compare the margin reference. The appointment
of a leader is regarded here as made, whereas we are only told in
the Book of Numbers that it was proposed.
Nehemiah 9:22. Thou didst
divide them into corners i.e., parts of the holy land;
or as some prefer “thou didst distribute them on all sides.”
Nehemiah 9:25. Became fat.
i.e., “grew proud,” or “wanton” — a phrase only occurring here, in
the margin reference, and in Jeremiah 5:28.
Delighted
themselves Rather, “luxuriated.” The word in the original does
not occur elsewhere; but cognate terms make the sense clear.
Nehemiah 9:26. Slew thy
prophets Compare 1 Kings 18:4; 19:10; 2 Chronicles 24:21.
Jewish tradition further affirms that more than one of the great
prophets (e.g., Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Ezekiel) were martyred by
their countrymen.
Nehemiah 9:27. Thou
gavest them saviours See Judges 3:15 etc.
Nehemiah 9:38. Seal unto
it The exact force of the phrase used is doubtful; but its
general sense must be that the classes named took part in the
sealing. It was usual in the East to authenticate covenants by
appending the seals of those who were parties to them (see
Jeremiah 32:10). |
|
Nehemiah 10
Nehemiah 10:1. The “Zidkijah”
of this passage is probably the same as “Zadok” (Nehemiah 13:13).
“Zadok” is expressly called “the scribe,” and it was probably as
the scribe who drew up the document that “Zidkijah” signed it
immediately after Nehemiah.
Nehemiah 10:2-8. The
names are not personal, but designate families. The seal of the
high-priestly house of Seraiah was probably appended either by
Ezra or Eliashib, both of whom belonged to it.
Nehemiah 10:31. Bring
ware ... on the sabbath day Compare Nehemiah 13:16, where this
desecration of the Sabbath is shown to have commonly taken place.
Leave the seventh year ... i.e., “let the land rest in the
sabbatical year” (margin reference) and give up the
“pledge-taking” (Nehemiah 10:2-10).
Nehemiah 10:32. The third
part of a sheckel This appears to have been the first occasion
on which an annual payment toward the maintenance of the temple
service and fabric was established. The half-shekel of the Law
(Exodus 30:13) was paid only at the time of a census (which rarely
took place), and was thus not a recurring tax. In later times, the
annual payment was raised from the third of a shekel to half a
shekel (Matthew 17:24).
Nehemiah 10:34. No
special provision was made by the Law, by David, or by Solomon,
for the supply of wood necessary to keep fire ever burning upon
the altar. Nehemiah established a system by which the duty of
supplying the wood was laid as a burden in turn on the various
clans or families, which were regarded as constituting the nation.
The lot was used to determine the order in which the several
families should perform the duty. A special day (the 14th of the
fifth month, according to Josephus) was appointed for the bringing
in of the supply; and this day was after a time regarded as a high
festival, and called “the feast of the wood-offering.” |
|
Nehemiah 11
Nehemiah 11:1. To
bring one of ten Artificial enlargements of capitals by
forcible transfers of population to them, were not unusual in
ancient times. About 500 B.C., Syracuse became a great city in
this way. Tradition ascribed the greatness of Rome, in part, to
this cause.
Nehemiah 11:4-19. See
the margin reference notes. Both accounts appear to be extracts
from a public official register which Nehemiah caused to be made
of his census. The census itself seems to have been confined to
the dwellers at Jerusalem. The subjoined table exhibits the
differences between the accounts of the entire population of
Jerusalem as given in Nehemiah and in Chronicles:
1 Chronicles Nehemiah
Tribe of Judah: Of Pharez
468 Of Zerah 690
Tribe of Benjamin: 956 928
Tribe of Levi: Priests 1760 1192 Levites 284 Porters 212 172
According to Nehemiah’s
numbers, supplemented from Chronicles, the entire adult male
population of the city was 3,734, which would give a total
population of 14,936. According to Chronicles, supplemented from
Nehemiah, the adult males were 4,370, and consequently the entire
population, would have been 17,480. As the Nethinims and the
Israelites of Ephraim and Manasseh (1 Chronicles 9:3) are not
included in either list, we may conclude that the actual number of
the inhabitants, after the efforts recorded in Nehemiah 11:1,2,
was not much short of 20,000.
Nehemiah 11:16. The
outward business of the house of God Such as the collection of the
newly-imposed tax (Nehemiah 10:32), the providing of the regular
sacrifices, the renewal of vestments, and the like.
Nehemiah 11:17. The
principal to begin the thanksgiving i.e., “the precentor,” or
“leader of the choir.”
Nehemiah 11:20. The
returned community, though consisting mainly of members of the two
tribes, represented the entire people of Israel. The ground,
however, which they occupied, was not the whole land, but that
which had constituted the kingdom of Judah.
Nehemiah 11:21.
Ophel, the southern spur of the temple hill, having a wall of
its own (Nehemiah 3:27) might be reckoned either in Jerusalem or
outside it. Here it is made a separate place.
Nehemiah 11:22. The
business intended was probably the internal business, as distinct
from the “outward business” (Nehemiah 11:16): a part of which was
the apportionment of the royal bounty among the members of the
choir (Nehemiah 11:23).
Nehemiah 11:23. The
goodwill of Artaxerxes toward the ministers employed in the temple
service, had been previously shown by his exempting them from
taxation of every kind (Ezra 7:24). Now, it would seem, he had
gone further and assigned to the singers an allowance from the
royal revenue.
Nehemiah 11:24. It is
difficult to say what office Pethahiah filled. So far as we know,
the only regular officers under the Persian system of government
were the satrap, the subsatrap, the permanent royal secretary, the
commandant, and the occasional commissary.
Nehemiah 11:25.
Kirjath-arba i.e., Hebron. In the absence of the Hebrews
during the captivity, the place had recovered its old name (Joshua
15:13).
Nehemiah 11:26-35.
Many of the places mentioned in these verses are mentioned in
Joshua 15:27-39; 18:21-28.
Nehemiah 11:36. Of
the Levites were divisions i.e., “the Levites were scattered
among various towns both in Judah and Benjamin.” |
|
Nehemiah 12
This chapter is made up of two
portions:
(a) lists of the leading
priests and Levites at different periods (Nehemiah 12:1-26):
(b) the dedication of the
wall of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 12:27-47).
This latter passage is
certainly from the pen of Nehemiah, and was written probably about
433 B.C.
The lists included in (a)
are four:
(1) the chief priestly and
Levitical families which returned to Jerusalem (Nehemiah 12:1-9);
(2) the succession of the high
priests from Jeshua to Jaddua (Nehemiah 12:10,11);
(3) the actual heads of the
priestly families in the time of the high priest Joiakim (Nehemiah
12:12-21);
(4) the chief Levitical
families at the same period (Nehemiah 12:24-26).
Of these lists, List 1, List 3, and List 4, may have been drawn up
in the time of Nehemiah, but List 2, in its present form, must be
much later. See the introduction of the Book of Nehemiah.
Nehemiah 12:1. The
priests The number of the names here given, which is 22, is
probably to be connected with that of the Davidic “courses,” which
was 24 (1 Chronicles 24:7-18). Eight names are identical with
those of the heads in David’s time. On comparing the present list
with that of the families who sealed to Nehemiah’s covenant
(Nehemiah 10:2-8), we shall find that the first sixteen recur in
that document nearly in the same order; but that the last six are
absent from it. It would seem that as these six declined to seal
to Nehemiah’s covenant, they were placed below the rest here in a
sort of supplementary list. Note especially the “and” which
connects the second part of the lists with the earlier part, both
in Nehemiah 12:6 and in Nehemiah 12:19.
Nehemiah 12:8. Of the
Levitical houses here mentioned, three only returned at first,
those of Jeshua, Kadmiel, and Judah or Hodevah (Nehemiah 7:43).
The others must have returned subsequently.
Nehemiah 12:10,11.
The six generations of high priests covered a little more than two
centuries (538-333 B.C.), or a little under thirty-five years to a
generation. Jaddua was the high priest who (according to Josephus)
had an interview with Alexander shortly after the battle of Issus.
Nehemiah 12:22,23.
These verses interrupt the account of the church officers in the
time of Joiakim, resumed in Nehemiah 12:24. They appear to be an
addition to the original text, made about the time of Alexander
the Great, when the Books of Chronicles, Ezra, and Nehemiah would
seem to have first taken their existing shape. The same writer who
introduced these verses, probably also added Nehemiah 12:11 to the
original text.
Darius the Persian
Probably Darius Codomannus (336-331 B.C.), the antagonist of
Alexander the Great. See the introduction of the Book of Nehemiah.
This passage shows that the
practice of keeping a record of public events in state archives
was continued after the return from the captivity, at least to the
time of Johanan, the son, i.e., “the grandson,” of Eliasbib.
Nehemiah 12:24. Jeshua
the son of Kadmiel If the reading be sound, this Jeshua must
have been the head of the Levitical family of Kadmiel in the time
of Joiakim; but (compare Nehemiah 8:7; 9:4), some read “Jeshua,
Bani, Kadmiel,” etc.
Ward over
against ward i.e., “alternately,” one part of the choir
corresponding the other.
Nehemiah 12:25. In 1
Chronicles 9:17,24,26, four families of porters only are
mentioned; six are implied here, in Nehemiah 7:45, and in Ezra
2:42. From 1 Chronicles 26:14-19 it appears that the temple had
four chief gates, fronting the cardinal points, and two minor
ones, “toward Asuppim,” and “at Parbar.”
Nehemiah 12:27. The
dedication of the wall The ceremony had been deferred for the
space of nearly 12 years (Nehemiah 13:6).
Perhaps Nehemiah required an
express permission from the Persian king before he could venture
on a solemnity which might have been liable to misrepresentation.
Out of all their places
i.e., out of the various cities of Judah and Benjamin in which
they dwelt (Nehemiah 11:36).
Nehemiah 12:28. The plain
country round about Jerusalem Perhaps the valleys of Hinnom
and Jehoshaphat, which enclose Jerusalem on three sides, are
intended.
The villages of
Netophathi Rather, as in 1 Chronicles 9:16. Netophah lay near
Bethlehem (1 Chronicles 2:54), and is perhaps represented by the
modern Antubeh.
Nehemiah 12:29. The house
of Gilgal Or, “Beth-Gilgal” — probably the Gilgal north of
Jerusalem (now “Jiljilia).
Nehemiah 12:31. I brought
up Note the resumption of the first person, which has been
laid aside since Nehemiah 7:5, and which is confirmed now to the
end of the book. It is generally allowed that we have here once
more a memoir by Nehemiah himself.
The two “companies”
or choirs, having ascended the wall on its western face, near the
modern Jaffa Gate, stood looking eastward toward the city and
temple; then the southern choir, being on the right, commenced the
circuit of the southern wall, while the choir upon the left
proceeded round the northern wall (Nehemiah 12:38-39), until both
met on the eastern wall, between the water and the prison gates.
Nehemiah 12:34. “Judah
and Benjamin” are the lay people of those two tribes.
Nehemiah 12:37. Above the
house of David This choir or procession went above (or beyond)
the old palace of David, following the line described in Nehemiah
3:16-26, on their way to the eastern wall.
Nehemiah 12:44. Judah
rejoiced Judah’s satisfaction with the priests and Levites
took the shape of increased offerings, more ample tithes, and the
like, from where the appointment of treasuries and treasurers
became necessary.
Nehemiah 12:45. The ward
of the purification The observances with respect to
purification. Compare 1 Chronicles 23:28.
Nehemiah 12:47. The
intention is to compare the religious activity and strictness of
Nehemiah’s time with that which had prevailed under Zerubbabel, as
described by Ezra (Ezra 6:16,22). It is implied that the
intermediate period had been a time of laxity.
They sanctified holy
things ... i.e, “the people paid their tithes regularly to the
Levites, and the Levites paid the tithe of the tithes to the
priests.” |
|
Nehemiah 13
Nehemiah 13:1. On that day
Or, “at that time,” as in Nehemiah 12:44.
The entire Pentateuch is
probably meant by “the Book of Moses”.
Nehemiah 13:3. A
separation like that made by Ezra, some 20 years previously (Ezra
10:15-44), seems to be intended. The pagan wives were divorced and
sent back, with their offspring, to their own countries.
Nehemiah 13:4. The
relations of Eliashib, the high priest (Nehemiah 3:1), with Tobiah
and Sanballat will account for the absence of any reference to him
either in Nehemiah 8—10, or in Nehemiah 12:27-47.
The chamber The
entire outbuilding, or “lean-to,” which surrounded the temple on
three sides (1 Kings 6:5-10).
Allied i.e,
“connected by marriage.” Tobiah was married to a Jewess (Nehemiah
6:18), who may have been a relation of Eliashib; and his son
Johanan was married to another (Nehemiah 6:18), of whom the same
may be said.
Nehemiah 13:5. The
offerings of the priests i e “the portion of the offerings
assigned for their sustenance to the priests.”
Nehemiah 13:6. Artaxerxes
king of Babylon See Nehemiah 1:1. Compare Ezra 6:22, where
Darius Hystaspis is called “king of Assyria.”
After certain days
Or, “at the end of a year,” which is a meaning that the phrase
often has (Exodus 13:10; Leviticus 25:29,30; Numbers 9:22).
Nehemiah probably went to the court at Babylon in 433 B.C., and
returned to Jerusalem 432 B.C.
Nehemiah 13:9. The
chambers The “great chamber” assigned to Tobiah (Nehemiah
13:5) contained, it would seem, more than one apartment.
Nehemiah 13:10. etc.
During Nehemiah’s absence there had been a general falling away,
and there was danger of a complete national apostasy.
Nehemiah 13:11. I
gathered them together Nehemiah gathered the Levites from
their lands, and reinstated them in their set offices.
Nehemiah 13:15. The
desecration of the Sabbath is first brought into prominence
among the sins of the Jewish people by Jeremiah (Jeremiah
17:21-27). It could not but have gained ground during the
captivity, when foreign masters would not have allowed the
cessation of labor for one day in seven. On the return from the
captivity, the sabbatical rest appears to have been one of the
institutions most difficult to reestablish.
In the day Some
render, “concerning the day.”
Nehemiah 13:16.
Friendly relations subsisted between the Phoenicians and the Jews,
after the captivity (Ezra 3:7). It was, however, a new fact, and
one pregnant with evil consequences, that the Tyrians should have
established a permanent colony at Jerusalem. Its influence on the
other inhabitants weakened the hold of the Law upon men’s
consciences, and caused it to be transgressed continually more and
more openly.
Nehemiah 13:19. The
gates were closed at the sunset of the day before the Sabbath;
since the Sabbath was regarded as commencing on the previous
evening.
Nehemiah 13:21. The
lodging of the merchants with their merchandise just outside
Jerusalem during the Sabbath, marked their impatience for the
moment when they might bring their wares in. This was thought by
Nehemiah to be unseemly, and to have an irreligious tendency.
Nehemiah 13:22. I
commanded the Levites At first Nehemiah had employed his own
retinue (Nehemiah 13:19) in the work of keeping the gates. He now
assigned the duty to the Levites, as one which properly belonged
to them, since the object of the regulation was the due observance
of the Sabbath.
Nehemiah 13:24. The
speech of Ashdod The Philistine language, which was akin to
that of Egypt.
According to the language
of each people The children spoke a mixed dialect —
half-Philistine, half-Hebrew.
Nehemiah 13:30. The wards
Rather, “the offices or observances.” Nehemiah’s arrangement is
probably that described in Nehemiah 11:10-22. |
|
DOWNLOAD
InstaVerse
for free. It is a simple to use Bible
Verse pop up tool that will allow you to read every cross reference quickly, in context and in the Version you prefer.
Only KJV is free but can also download
free copy of
Bible Explorer
with
free Bibles including excellent, literal English
Standard Version (ESV). (NAS, NIV, et al available for purchase)
How does it work? Hold mouse pointer over the Scripture reference,
and up pops passage
in context!
InstaVerse
works anywhere
on the Web as offline (Word for Windows, email programs like
Outlook. This tool really works...you will be amazed and
edified. (click) Note it won't work
if there is no space between book name and chap (Mt1:1 won't pop
up but Mt 1:1 will) |
|