PAUL: Paulos:
(Acts
13:9;22:7;26:1,14)
Guy King
introduces this letter with these comments...
THE opening of this Epistle is
different from that of most in one very interesting particular. It is a
difference shared by all three of the Macedonian Epistles - this, and
the two to the Thessalonians - and by the little personal note to
Philemon. It consists in the somewhat noteworthy absence of the word
apostle. In all his other letters, Paul feels it incumbent upon him
to remind his readers that he writes with all the weight that his
sublime position gives him; he will have occasion to administer rebuke,
and, sometimes, rather bluntly, to give directions - and lest, because
he was their friend, they might treat his words not too seriously, he
takes care to let them understand that he speaks with an authority, and
that they must give due and proper heed to what he says.
But his case is otherwise when he writes to his beloved Philippians.
The church at Philippi", says Dr.
Graham Scroggie, "was almost quite free from those errors which beset so
many of the churches of that day"; and he goes on to quote Professor
Findlay as saying, "This is an epistle of the heart, a true love letter,
full of friendship, gratitude, and confidence.
There is, we feel, no need to obtrude
his apostleship here; and so his opening greetings are not
inappropriately described as a "salut d'amour" - his letter will be
found to be full of, and his heart to be full of, Love. (King, Guy: Joy
Way: An Exposition of the Epistle of Paul to the Philippians, 1952,
Christian Literature Crusade)
Background:
Read Acts 16:1ff, for the birth of the church at Philippi (After you
read the chapter yourself see Bob
Deffinbaugh's article
The Birth of the Church at Philippi - Acts
15:36–16:40), keeping in mind
that these events occurred during Paul's Second Missionary Journey after
he and Barnabas had gone separate ways. In this fascinating and
strategic chapter you will read of Paul's selection of young
Timothy to travel with him to Philippi. You will read about the first
"European" convert named Lydia, a Gentile Asian from Thyatira in Asia
Minor (modern day Turkey) and a proselyte to Judaism. You will read
about the Greek soothsayer, out of whom Paul cast a demon and who might
have been a convert (although the text does not allow one to be
dogmatic). And finally you will read about the first Roman convert in
Europe, a jailer who would have had little class and social standing.
This was the birth of the church at Philippi, a church that you will see
as your read this letter was very special to Paul. Although specific
dates are not given, it appears that the church at Philippi had its
birth about 51BC. This epistle we know today as "Philippians" was
written some 10 years later (about 61BC) by Paul during his first
imprisonment in Rome. Keep these thoughts in mind as you read this
letter in which he mentions several saints by name, indicating that
despite the passage of the years, these saints have remained near and
dear to the apostle's heart. What an example for leaders to emulate
today!
For more on the introduction and
book outline see Robert Herrick's Introductory Comments
Introduction, Background, and Outline to
Philippians or those by
Daniel Wallace
Philippians: Introduction, Argument, and
Outline
Paul
(3972) is from Latin,
Paulos meaning "little, small". Before his Damascus Road
experience he was known by his Hebrew name Saul (Greek
Saulos) which means "desired" or "ask"
(derived from Hebrew word for "ask")
AND TIMOTHY: kai Timotheos:
(For more on "Timothy"
Nave's Topical,
Easton's,
Smith's,
ISBE)
Timothy
(5095)
(Timeotheos from
Time = worth or merit of some
object +
theos
=God) (24x
in NAS) means literally "honoring God". The Greek word for
"honor" has in it the ideas of reverence and veneration.
Bruce comments that...
Paul is the sole author of the
letter, even if Timothy's name is conjoined with his in the prescript.
(Quoted from Apple's
Philippians Commentary)
Turner adds that
Timothy, who was not an apostle and
did not have Paul's authority, was considered by Paul to be his equal
when it came to servanthood. (Quoted from Apple's
Philippians Commentary)
Lightfoot notes
The relationship between Timothy and
the Philippian church had been constant and intimate.
Paul associates Timothy with himself in the
greeting, because he is a co-laborer not because he is a co-author of the epistle, for from
Phil 1:3
onward he writes in the first person singular and in
Phil
2:19-23 he speaks of Timothy in the
third person. Timothy had accompanied him when the church at Philippi was
founded (Acts
16:1–12), had revisited it at his request
(Acts 19:22),
and had again accompanied him on the occasion of a later visit (Acts
20:4).
So the Philippians were very familiar with him.
Matthew Henry
offers an interesting thought that
Though Paul was alone divinely inspired, he joins Timothy with himself,
to express his own humility, and put honour upon Timothy. Those who are
aged, and strong, and eminent, should pay respect to, and support the
reputation of, those who are younger, and weaker, and of less note.
BOND-SERVANTS: douloi: (Mk 13:34, Jn 12:26; 13:14, 15, 16; 15:15,
20, 2Cor 4:5; Gal 1:10; Php 1:1; Titus 1:1; James 1:1; 2Peter 1:1; Jude 1:1;
Rev 1:1; 22:6,9)
Bondservant
(1401)
(doulos
from
deo = to bind)
(Click
additional notes on
doulos) was an individual bound to another
in servitude and
conveys the idea of the slave's close, binding ties with his master,
belonging to him, obligated to and desiring to do his will and in a
permanent relation of servitude. In sum, the will of the doulos is
consumed in the will of the master.
A bondservant is one who
surrendered wholly to another’s will and thus devoted to another to the
disregard of his own interest. Paul and Timothy were not their own but had
been bought with the price of the blood of Christ. They were now the property
of our Lord Jesus Christ and were His slaves exclusively. No man can serve two
masters (Mt 6:24-note).
Paul and Timothy had been slaves of Sin (see note on
"the Sin")
by their birth into Adam's likeness, but now they are slaves of Christ by
their new, second birth. They had no will of their own, no business of their
own, no time of their own and were acting for their Master, Christ; dependent
upon Him and obedient to Him.
Doulos is used 124 times (in 117
verses) in the NT (Mt 8:9; 10:24, 25; 13:27, 28; 18:23, 26, 27, 28, 32; 20:27;
21:34, 36, 37; 22:3, 4, 6, 8, 10; 24:45, 6, 48, 50; 25:14, 19, 21, 23, 26, 30;
26:51; Mk. 10:44; 12:2, 4; 13:34; 14:47; Lk. 2:29; 7:2, 3, 8, 10; 12:37, 43,
45, 46, 47, 14:17, 21, 22, 23; 15:22; 17:7, 9, 10; 19:13, 15, 17, 22; 20:10,
11; 22:50; Jn. 4:51; 8:34, 35; 13:16; 15:15, 20; 18:10, 18, 26; Acts 2:18;
4:29; 16:17; Ro 1:1; 6:16, 17, 20; 1 Co. 7:21, 22, 23; 12:13; 2Co 4:5; Gal.
1:10; 3:28; 4:1, 7; Ep 6:5, 6, 8; Phil. 1:1; 2:7; Col. 3:11, 22; 4:1, 12; 1Ti
6:1; 2Ti 2:24; Titus 1:1; 2:9; Philemon 1:16; James 1:1; 1Pe 2:16; 2Pe 1:1;
2:19; Jude 1:1; Re 1:1; 2:20; 6:15; 7:3; 10:7; 11:18; 13:16; 15:3; 19:2, 5,
18; 22:3, 6.
There are some 294 uses of doulos in the
Septuagint (LXX)
(Lev 25:44; 26:13; Deut. 32:36; Jos. 9:23; 24:29; Jdg. 2:8; 6:27; 9:28;
15:18; 1Sa 2:27; 3:9, 10; 8:14, 15, 16; 12:19; 13:3; 14:21, 41; 16:16; 17:9, 32, 34,
36; 19:4; 20:7, 8; 22:8, 14, 15; 23:10, 11; 25:10, 39; 26:17, 18, 19; 27:5, 12; 28:2; 29:3,
8; 30:13; 2Sa 3:18; 6:20; 7:5, 8, 19, 20, 21, 25, 27, 28, 29; 8:2, 6, 14; 9:2, 6, 8,
10, 11, 12; 10:2, 19; 11:9, 11, 13, 17, 21, 24; 12:18; 13:24, 35; 14:19, 20, 22, 30;
15:2, 8, 21, 34; 18:29; 19:5, 7, 14, 17, 20, 26, 27, 28, 35, 36, 37; 21:22; 24:10, 21; 1Ki. 1:19, 26,
27, 33, 47, 51; 2:38, 39, 40; 3:6, 7, 8; 5:6, 9; 8:12, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 28,
29, 30, 36, 52,
56, 59, 66; 11:11, 13, 26, 32, 34, 36, 38; 12:7, 24; 15:29; 18:9, 12, 36;
20:9, 32, 39, 40; 21:28; 2Ki 1:13, 14; 4:1; 5:6, 15, 17, 18, 25; 6:3; 8:13, 19; 9:7,
36; 10:10, 19, 21, 22, 23; 12:20, 21; 14:5, 25; 16:7; 17:3, 13, 23; 18:12, 24; 19:34;
20:6; 21:8, 10; 22:9, 12; 24:1, 2; 1Chr 17:7, 18, 26; 2Chr 2:8; 6:23, 42;
28:10; 36:20; Ezra 2:65; 4:15; 5:11; 9:9, 11; Neh 1:6, 11; 2:10, 19, 20; 5:5;
7:57, 60, 67; 9:14, 36; 10:29; 11:3; Job 41:4; Ps 19:11, 13; 27:9; 31:16;
34:22; 35:27; 36:1; 69:36; 78:70; 79:2, 10; 80:4; 86:2, 4; 89:3, 20, 39, 50;
90:13, 16; 102:14, 28; 105:6, 17, 25, 26, 42; 109:28; 116:16; 119:17, 23, 38, 49,
65, 76, 84, 91, 122, 124, 125, 135, 140, 176; 123:2; 132:10; 134:1; 135:1, 9, 14;
136:22; 143:2, 12; 144:10; Pr 9:3; Eccl 2:7; 5:12; 7:21; 10:7; Is 14:2;
42:19; 45:14; 48:20; 49:3, 5, 7; 56:6; 63:17; 65:9; Je 2:14; 3:22; 7:25;
25:4; 46:27; La 5:8; Ezek 28:25; 34:23; 37:24, 25; 38:17; Da 3:26; 6:20;
9:6, 10, 11, 17; Joel 2:29; Amos 3:7; Jon 1:9; Hag 2:23; Zech 1:6; 3:8; Mal 1:6; 4:4)
Click
the convicting poem
He Had No Rights written
by Mabel Williamson a missionary to China.
In the Greek culture doulos
usually referred to
the involuntary, permanent service of a slave, but the use in the
epistles of Paul and Peter elevates the meaning of doulos to the Hebrew
sense which describes a servant who willingly commits himself to serve a
master he loves and respects
(cp
Ex 21:5, 6 Dt 15:12-16
discussed below). By Roman times, slavery was so extensive that in
the early Christian period one out of every two people was a slave! From at
least 3000BC captives in war were the primary source of slaves.
Doulos speaks of
submission to one's master The doulos
had no life of his own, no will of his own, no purpose of his own and no
plan of his own. All was subject to his master. The bondservant's every
thought, breath, and effort was subject to the will of his master. In
sum, the picture of a bondservant is one who is absolutely surrendered
and
totally devoted to his master. What a picture of Paul and Timothy's relation
to their Lord! What an example for all believers of every age to emulate!
This word provides an incredible word
picture of those who bound to their Lord Jesus Christ, Who had bought them
with a price to be His own possession (cf 1Cor 6:20, Acts 20:28, Gal 3:13, Heb
9:12-note,
1Pe 1:18-note,
Re 5:9-note,
Titus 2:14-note,
1Pe 2:9-note).
By using doulos Paul is saying
"I am
a slave to the
Lord Jesus Christ. I am absolutely sold out to His will. I am willing to
do whatever He tells me to do. I am willing to say whatever He tells me
to say. I am willing to go wherever He leads me. I am a man who has made
a choice. I am going to serve Him for all eternity."
Matthew Henry adds that...
"The highest honour
of the greatest apostle, and most eminent ministers, is to be the
servants of Jesus Christ; not the masters of the churches, but the
servants of Christ."
Kenneth Wuest explains
that a doulos as
"the most abject, servile term used
by the Greeks to denote a slave. The word designated one who was born as
a slave, one who was bound to his master in chords so strong that only death
could break them, one who served his master to the disregard of his own
interests, one whose will was swallowed up in the will of his master. Paul was
born a slave of sin at his physical birth, and a bondslave of his Lord through
regeneration. (Note: There was another word, andrapodon which was
person taken prisoner in war and sold into slavery) The chords that bound
him to his old master Satan, were rent asunder in his identification with
Christ in the latter’s death (Ro
6).
The chords that bind him to his new Master will never be broken since the new
Master will never die again, and is Paul’s new life (Php 1:21-note,Col
3:3,4-note). He has changed masters
because he has a new nature (2Cor 5:17, 2Pe 1:3,4-note), the divine, and the evil nature which compelled
him to serve the Devil has had its power over him broken (Col 1:13-note,
Heb 2:14, 15-note). Paul’s will, at one
time swallowed up in the will of Satan, now is swallowed up in the sweet will
of God.
The reader will observe how wonderfully God has watched over the
development of the Greek language so that at the time it was needed as the
medium through which He would give His New Testament revelation to the human
race, its words were fit receptacles and efficient instruments for the
conveyance of His message to man. Paul calls himself a bondslave of Christ
Jesus... The apostle is proud of the fact that he is a slave belonging to
his Lord. There were certain individuals in the Roman empire designated
“Slaves of the Emperor.” This was a position of honor. One finds a reflection
of this in Paul’s act of designating himself as a slave of the King of kings.
He puts this ahead of his apostleship."
(Wuest,
K. S. Wuest's Word Studies from the Greek New Testament: Studies in the
Vocabulary of the Greek New Testament: Grand Rapids: Eerdmans) (Bolding added)
The function of a doulos is to serve His Master. The great
violinist, Niccolo Paganini willed his marvelous violin to city of Genoa on
condition that it must never be played. The wood of such an instrument, while
used and handled, wears only slightly, but set aside, it begins to decay.
Paganini’s lovely violin has today become worm-eaten and useless except as a
relic. A Christian’s unwillingness to serve His Master may also destroy his
capacity for usefulness.
|
BONDSERVANT
A Summary |
|
The doulos...
•
Was owned by and totally possessed by his master.
•
Existed for his master and no other reason.
•
Had no
personal rights.
•
Was at the master’s disposal "24/7".
•
Had no will of his own but was completely subservient to the master. |
Paradoxically a bondservant of the Most
High God is one of the most privileged, noblest professions in the world.
Little wonder that notable men
of God in the have always been called the servants of God. The list of
names includes (use
InstaVerse
to see Scriptures in context in the version you prefer)
Moses (Dt 34:5 Ps 105:26 Mal
4:4)
Joshua (Josh 24:29)
David (2Sa 3:18 Ps 78:70)
Paul (Ro 1:1-note;
Phil 1:1; Titus 1:1-note)
Peter (2Pe 1:1-note)
James (James 1:1-note)
Jude (Jude 1:1 )
Prophets (Amos 3:7; Jer 7:25).
Ideally believers (Acts 2:18;
1Co 7:22; Ep 6:6-note;
Col 4:12-note;
2Ti 2:24-note).
Guy King comments on the phrase
bondservants of Christ Jesus writing...
Let it be said at once that the word
here is the same as bond-slaves - a conception which would
be vividly familiar to every reader of this Letter. Quite a number of
them were, or had been, slaves themselves - and the word would catch
their attention at once. I say "had been" of some, because the law of
manumission (process of releasing from slavery) would have operated in
their case - a price would have been paid, and the slave set free.
In his fascinating Light from the Ancient East, Dr. Deissmann, pp. 319
ff., has some most interesting paragraphs on this releasing of slaves
(see note that follows); and, with his quick and ready mind, the late
Archbishop Harrington Lees, in his CHRIST and His Slaves, made use of
the learned Doctor's discoveries to point many a moral concerning
spiritual servitude and release.
Paul's writings abound in allusions to this last phenomenon. The
material and the spiritual are found together in such a passage as
1Corinthians 7:22,
He that is called in the LORD, being
a servant, is the Lord's freedman: likewise also he that is called,
being free, is Christ's servant.
When a man becomes a Christian,
though materially bound as a slave, he is spiritually freed from bondage
to Satan and sin; on the other hand, such a man, though materially set
at liberty, is, in the spiritual sense, bound hand and foot to CHRIST.
How Paul himself rejoiced - and even gloried - in this New Slavery. In
his letters he so constantly uses the word as indicating his
relationship to JESUS CHRIST. He would so readily enter into the
attitude of the well-satisfied slave of Exodus 21:5, "I love my Master .
. . I will not go out free."
From the bondage of sin, the believer
has, by the manumission price of "the precious Blood", (1Pe
1:18, 19-notes),
been set free-only to find himself thereby committed to a bondage more
binding than ever. Yet, this time the "service is perfect freedom", the
bonds are honourable and sweet.
And, for our encouragement, let us remember that
(i) The Master is responsible for His slaves' needs - feeding,
housing, clothing, and all else is the slave owner's concern. It is
because we are GOD'S servants (slaves) that our Lord says "Therefore . .
. take no thought . . .", (Mt 6:24-note;
Mt 6:25-note),
for the ordinary needs of life. Our apostle will say later in this very
Epistle, "My GOD shall supply all your need." (see note
Philippians 4:19)
Also
(ii) The Master is responsible for His slaves' duties - they will
not choose their own task, or their own sphere. Whether ours is to be
the more menial, or the more genial, work is in His plan, not ours. It
is the Christian's wisdom to stand before Him as those in 2Samuel
15:15, "Thy servants are ready to do whatsoever my Lord the King shall
appoint", or as Gabriel in Luke 1:19, "I . . . stand. . . and am sent .
. .".
Then, too
(iii) The Master is responsible for His slaves' supplies - "Who
goeth a warfare any time at his own charges?" asks 1Corinthians 9:7: the
soldier has all his military equipment provided; and likewise, the slave
is supplied with everything needful for the adequate discharge of all
his duties. Whatever He tells us to do, we can do - "If . . . God
command thee . . . thou shalt be able to . . ." Exodus 18:23 - because
all supplies are at our disposal. And as Paul records, in 2 Corinthians
12:9, "My grace is sufficient for thee". (Ibid)
Regarding the setting free of slaves
in Paul's day, Deissmann records the following custom which has
clear parallels with Paul's teaching on saints as bondslaves of
Christ...
Among the various ways in which the
manumission of a slave could take place by ancient law we find the
solemn rite of fictitious purchase of the slave by some divinity. The
owner comes with the slave to the temple, sells him there to the god,
and receives the purchase money from the temple treasury, the slave
having previously paid it in there out of his savings. The slave is now
the property of the god; not, however, a slave of the temple, but a
protégé of the god. Against all the world, especially his former master,
he is a completely free man; at the utmost a few pious obligations to
his old master are imposed upon him. The rite takes place before
witnesses; a record is taken, and often perpetuated on stone.
(Deissmann, A., & Strachan, L. R. M. Light from the Ancient East the New
Testament illustrated by recently discovered texts of the Graeco-Roman
world. Pager 326. London: Hodder & Stoughton. 1910).
Dr Wayne Barber has an excellent practical explanation of the
significance of a bondservant asking the practical question...
"Why do you serve the Lord Jesus
Christ? "Well, I had better. God will kill me if I don’t." You know, I’ve
talked to a lot of people who have that mentality. It is as if God has a
big club and if you don’t do what He wants you to do, then He will hit you
over the head with it. Yet God says, "Wait a minute. I have set you free.
You are free now to be what you ought to be. Make up your mind. No man can
serve two masters." The person who has any sense at all will say, "Lord,
You have overwhelmed me. I am making a choice out of love for You to be
Your slave. I know I am no longer Your slave, but I choose to be Your
slave." Do you want to be used by the Lord? Come to the place in your life
that you are willing to say, "God, it doesn’t matter what You tell me to
do, I am willing to be submissive to Your will." When you come to that
place, God will do things through you like He did through Paul. One
picture of that is beautiful, and it is found in Deut 15:12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 17:
If your kinsman, a Hebrew man or woman,
is sold to you, then he shall serve you six years, but in the seventh year
you shall set him free. And when you set him free, you shall not send him
away empty-handed. You shall furnish him liberally from your flock and
from your threshing floor and from your wine vat; you shall give to him as
the Lord your God has blessed you. And you shall remember that you were a
slave in the land of Egypt, and the Lord your God redeemed you; therefore
I command you this today. And it shall come about if he says to you, ‘I
will not go out from you,’ because he loves you and your household, since
he fares well with you; then you shall take an awl and pierce it through
his ear into the door, and he shall be your servant forever. And also you
shall do likewise to your maidservant. (Cp Ex 21:2, 3, 4, 5,6) (Related
resources - see
Spurgeon's sermon -
Ears Bored to the Door Post;
see
Devotional by F B Meyer)
What a gorgeous picture. Slavery in that day and time was
nothing like we know today. The slaves had to be treated as if they were
your own children in your own family. You had to treat them with dignity
and integrity. After they had served you for a period of time, you had to
set them free. But the beautiful picture here is of a slave. He served a
master for seven years. The master has loved him, provided for him, been
kind to him, helped him, all the things that you would look for. Now the
day comes that he has been set free. He is given of the flock, given of
the threshing floor, given of the wine vat. This servant stands there, and
he says, "You know, I have been so cared for during the seven years that I
have worked with you, where would I go? I don’t know where I am going to
go. Nobody would love me like you have loved me. Nobody would do for me
what you have done for me. Why, I am going to choose to be your slave. I
know you have set me free, but because of who you are and because of my
love for you, I want to continue to be your slave. I want to do for you
not because I have to but because I just want to." What a gorgeous
picture. They had a public ceremony and they would take that little
instrument and put it up by their ear and drive it through the ear into
the door, leaving a hole in the ear. What a gorgeous picture when you see
this slave walking alongside his master, smiling. You would see that man
and you knew he had been with him seven years, maybe it is three years
down the road past that seven years and you say, "Isn’t that wonderful!
That man was set free and now that man has chosen to serve out of love for
his master." Man looks on the outside. God looks at our heart. Why are you
serving the Lord Jesus? If you don’t love Him, if you haven’t understood
that nobody else will ever treat you like Jesus, then no wonder you are
not being used of the Lord in the task He has assigned to His church. A
man that God can use is a person who is willing to bow, a person who is
willing to say, "God, I just want what You want in my life." ...God is
waiting on us to love Him and to bow before Him and to make conscious
choices. "God, you have given me everything. If I left you, where would I
go? Lord, I want to serve you. No man can serve two masters. I want to
serve You. I want to be usable in the kingdom of God." That is the Apostle
Paul. He was a man who was willing, sold out to the will of God." (Click for additional
notes by Dr. Barber on "bondservant)
Harry Ironside wrote that Paul...
"does not mean however that his was a service of bondage. Rather he
served in the whole-hearted obedience of one who realized that he had been
"bought with a price," even the precious blood of Christ. There is a story told
of an African slave whose master was about to slay him with a spear when a
chivalrous British traveler thrust out his arm to ward off the blow, and it was
pierced by the cruel weapon. As the blood spurted out he demanded the person of
the slave, saying he had bought him by his suffering. To this the former master
ruefully agreed. As the latter walked away, the slave threw himself at the feet
of his deliverer exclaiming, "The blood-bought is now the slave of the son of
pity. He will serve him faithfully." And he insisted on accompanying his
generous deliverer, and took delight in waiting upon him in every possible way.
Thus had Paul, thus has each redeemed one, become the bondman of Jesus Christ.
We have been set free to serve, and may well exclaim with the Psalmist (Ps
116:16).
A businessman once
asked his Bible study group,
“How can you tell if you have a servant attitude?”
The reply came back...
“By the way you react when you
are treated like one.”
It’s not easy to find an attitude
like that. But for a disciple, servant-hood is one of the keys to growing in
Christ-likeness.
Describing His own ministry, Jesus
said:
“For
the Son
of man also came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a
ransom for many” (Mark10:45)
When we give Jesus Christ His
rightful place as Lord of our lives, His Lordship will be expressed in the way
we serve others. Therefore, one of the best ways we can demonstrate our love
for God is by showing love for our fellow man. We demonstrate love for others
by helping them, by sharing their problems, and by doing what we can for them.
Why should we serve? For Jesus’ sake.
OF
CHRIST JESUS: douloi Christou Iesou:
Christ
(5547) is
a transliteration of the Greek word
Christos
(from
chrio
= to anoint, rub with oil, consecrate to an office) which is equivalent to the
Hebrew word which is translated "Messiah", the Anointed One.
In the Gospels the Christ is not a personal name but an
official designation for the expected Messiah (see Matthew 2:4, Luke
3:15).
As by faith the human Jesus was recognized and accepted as the personal
Messiah, the definite article ("the") was dropped and the designation "Christ" came to be used as a
personal name. The name "Christ" speaks of His Messianic dignity and
emphasizes that He is the fulfillment of the Old Testament promises concerning
the coming Messiah.
As discussed below the name "Jesus,"
comes from the Greek lesous, the Greek form of the Hebrew name "Joshua,"
which means "Jehovah saves." It was the name given Him by the angel
before He was born (Luke 1:31 ; Matthew 1:21). His human name speaks of
the fact of His Incarnation, His taking upon Himself human form to
become our Savior.
The order "Jesus Christ"
places the emphasis on the historical appearing of the man Jesus Who by faith
was recognized and acknowledged as the Messiah. It proclaims the fact that "Jesus
is the Christ." It speaks of Him Who came in human form, became obedient
unto death,, and was afterward exalted and glorified. This order is, always
followed in the epistles of Peter, John, James, and Jude.
The combination of Christós Iesoús emphasizes His deity and His humanity,
fully God and fully man! "Christ Jesus" points to the theological fact
that the One who was with the Father in eternal glory became incarnate in
human form.
Vine adds the following interesting thoughts on the order of "Christ"
before or after "Jesus" writing that
Christ
Jesus" describes the Exalted One who emptied Himself (Php 2:5), and testifies to His
preexistence; "Jesus Christ" describes the despised and rejected One
who was afterwards glorified (Php 2:11), and testifies to His resurrection. "Christ Jesus"
suggests His grace, "Jesus Christ" suggests His glory.
Wuest adds that
We have therefore in these two names, the Messianic office of our Lord,
His deity, and His substitutionary atonement.
Daniel 9:25 refers to Jesus as "Messiah the Prince"
(see
Daniel's Seventieth Week) where the Hebrew word
for Messiah is Mashiyach (4899) a word which in the
OT implied an anointing from God for a special function.
The expression "of Christ Jesus" is literally "in
Christ Jesus" ("in" is the literal translation of the preposition "en" - see
note by Wuest below) and similar expressions such as "in Christ," "in the
Lord," and "in the Lord Jesus" frequently punctuate Philippians. It was a
union with Christ in which the saints shared Christ’s resurrection life (Phil
3:9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 -notes).
Though they were a special group in the city of Philippi, they were special
there because they were first special "in Christ Jesus." These words indicate
how extraordinary was the context in which this letter must be set.
Jesus
is derived from Joshua or Jehoshua
[yehoshua']
meaning “Yahweh is salvation" or "Jehovah His help" or "Jehovah
saves". It is interesting to read the comment by Jesus' contemporary,
Josephus, the Jewish historian, explaining Who Jesus was. Josephus writes
"(63) Now,
there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him
a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such men as receive
the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many
of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; (64) and when Pilate, at the
suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross,
those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to
them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these
and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of
Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day." {Note that
Josephus acknowledges both Jesus as Man & Messiah as well as substantiating
the facts about His crucifixion & resurrection (so in essence Josephus is
acknowledging "the gospel") (Antiquities of the Jews, Book 18, chapter 3,
paragraph 3)
TO ALL THE SAINTS IN CHRIST
JESUS: pasin tois hagiois en Christo Iesou:
(Ro 1:7; 1Co 1:2; 2Co 1:1; Ep 1:1 1:15; 2Th 1:10)
"To all (without exception) the holy ones, set apart by the Spirit
for God the Father, in covenant and union with Messiah Jesus"
"to everyone who is
united with Christ Jesus" (GWT)
"to all God's holy people"
(ICB)
"It is written to all of God's people in Philippi" (NLT)
All (3956)
occurs seven times in this first nine verses (and 32 times in only 4
chapters so it is a key
word) and conveys the
meaning of all without exception.
In this context all...saints refers to
even the meanest (low in rank or
birth), the poorest, and those of the least gifts. Christ makes no
difference; the rich and the poor meet together in him: and the
ministers must not make a difference in their care and tenderness upon
these accounts.
(Matthew
Henry).
James echoes this thought
of equality at the "foot of the Cross" writing...
My brethren, do not hold your faith
in our glorious Lord Jesus Christ with an attitude of personal
favoritism. (Jas 2:1)
How are you doing in regard to your regard for your all
your spiritual brothers and sisters in Christ Jesus?
Paul sets the bar
"high" and only those controlled by the Spirit of Christ
(Ep 5:18-note)
can attain to this high Christ
like
standard (cp Php 2:3-note).
JFB adds that the all
"implies comprehensive affection which desired not to forget any one
among them "all."
Guy King remarks that Paul
begins by addressing his readers ...
in terms of their relationship to the
LORD JESUS CHRIST: and that must, of course, ever be remembered to be
the true starting-point of all Christian experience, and all Christian
instruction. We do well, in taking up the study of any of the Epistles,
to enquire carefully into that matter of where we stand in reference to
Him.
The Epistles are, in a fundamental sense, the property of believers -
they have, except incidentally, nothing to say to the people of the
world - their message is addressed to the Church, the members of His
body - their teaching is to be grasped and enjoyed only by those who
have been truly "born again" of the same SPIRIT who inspired the writing
of the Epistles. We are, therefore, not wasting time if we pause to ask
ourselves about our relationship to CHRIST - have we, indeed, received
Him into our hearts and lives, as our own personal SAVIOUR? Only so,
have we legitimate entrance to this Treasure House; if so, we have
undisputed access to all its Treasure Trove. Our relationship to Him
then determines both how we get into it, and what we get out of it.
Note what is said here concerning that relationship, for the terms
employed are applicable to all believers - both to Paul and
Timothy who send forth the Epistle, and to the original, and all
subsequent, readers of it: you and me amongst them...
All GOD'S people are thus designated
(saints) - the sense of the word being "set apart", or
"consecrated"; and this quite irrespective of personal character. As
Lightfoot points out,
Even the irregularities and
prolificacies of the Corinthian Church do not forfeit it this title.
Yet, be it said that those who are
positionally holy are expected to be practically holy.
I am always intrigued by the way it is put in Ro 1:7
(note),
and in 1Corinthians 1:2, called to be saints -
where the "to be" is printed in italics, as indicating that those words
are not in the Greek but are introduced by the translators to give what
they deem to be the sense. But just "called saints" would be accurate,
wouldn't it?
In this very Epistle they are called saints, and in others; it is
one of GOD'S names for His own.
Yes, but as soon as we are called saints we are called to be
saints! To be what we are.
There would be something wrong about
a prince living like a pauper, about an Englishman
masquerading as an alien, about a grown-up person behaving like a
child - no. Let's be what we are. If, by GOD'S mercy and grace, we are
Christians, let us in all things comport ourselves as such: if we
are called saints, we are most assuredly called to be saints:
let our conduct, then, be as becometh saints, Ep 5:3
(note), in all respects.
What a tremendous impression would be made upon the world if only we
Christians were what we are. It is one of the world's most damaging
accusations against us that we do not act up to our profession. A
Christian is a "CHRIST'S one": let him, then, be Christly
- to use the word that W. Y. Fullerton was so fond of.
Come now, how much of this true saintliness is there about us? Never
mind about considering, or criticizing, others - what about ourselves,
you and me: do Name and Nature coincide? Whether we be "bishops",
"presbyters", (Lightfoot), or "deacons", or members of the rank and
file, we are all to be saints.
Here, then, in these two great words, servants and saints,
we have the apostle's description of Christians everywhere. (Ibid)
Saints (40)
(hagios
=
set apart ones, separated ones, sanctified ones, holy ones) is literally
a holy one and depending on the context refers to
whoever or whatever is set apart (sanctified) for a special
purpose.
Saints have been
supernaturally set apart (sanctified by the Holy Spirit, 1Pe 1:2-note;
2Th 2:13, Ro 15:16-note,
Acts 20:32, 26:18, 1Co 1:30, 6:11) for a special purpose (cp s 43:7, Ep
2:10-note,
Mt 5:16-note,
Php 2:15-note),
set apart from the world (Gal 6:14, cp Jas 4:4, 1Jn 2:15, 16, 17), the
power of
Sin
and the
fallen flesh
(Ro 6:6-note,
Ro 6:11-note,
Ro 6:12, 13, 6:14-note)
and the dominion of the
devil
(Col 1:13-note,
Acts 26:18, Heb 2:14, 15-note)
and unto God (Ro 14:7, 8, 9-notes).
Hagios
is Paul's favorite description of believers and designates the
believer's position in Christ
(see discussion of
in Christ
and
in Christ Jesus) as
holy or set apart from that which
is secular, profane, and evil and dedicated unto God, His worship
and His service (note order - worship before service, cp Mary and Martha
- Lk 10:38, 39, 40, 41, 42).
Saints are
now to live in this present evil age (Gal 1:4) in a manner which
reflects what we were redeemed and "re-created" to be (1Pe 2:24, 25-note;
cp 2Co 7:1 -
note)
--- holy ones in character
(character is what God knows we are; reputation is who other people
think we are) and
conduct, set apart by God to be exclusively His possession (1Co
6:19, 20, Titus 2:14-note) manifesting holiness of heart.
Contrary to
some religious teachings, the Bible itself never
uses the word hagios or saint to refer to a "special class" of believers who are a "notch
above" the rest. We are all equal at the foot of His Cross! (cp
2Cor 3:5,6, saints have "a faith of the same kind" as Peter! - 2Pe 1:1-note)
To reiterate, those who are holy
in position (in Christ) now have the responsibility (and the power) to
live holy in their experience (Christ like). Positional
holiness is tantamount to justification, while experiential
holiness represents progressive sanctification (growth in holiness
or Christ likeness). (See related topic -
Three Tenses of Salvation)
Hagios is used some
232 times in the NT in the NAS - Mt 1:18, 20; 3:11; 4:5; 7:6; 12:32;
24:15; 27:52, 53; 28:19; Mk. 1:8, 24; 3:29; 6:20; 8:38; 12:36; 13:11; Lk
1:15, 35, 41, 49, 67, 70, 72; 2:23, 25, 26; 3:16, 22; 4:1, 34; 9:26;
10:21; 11:13; 12:10, 12; Jn. 1:33; 6:69; 14:26; 17:11; 20:22; Acts 1:2,
5, 8, 16; 2:4, 33, 38; 3:14, 21; 4:8, 25, 27, 30, 31; 5:3, 32; 6:5, 13;
7:33, 51, 55; 8:15, 17, 19; 9:13, 17, 31, 32, 41; 10:22, 38, 44, 45, 47;
11:15, 16, 24; 13:2, 4, 9, 52; 15:8, 28; 16:6; 19:2, 6; 20:23, 28;
21:11, 28; 26:10; 28:25; Ro 1:2, 7; 5:5; 7:12; 8:27; 9:1; 11:16; 12:1,
13; 14:17; 15:13, 16, 25, 26, 31; 16:2, 15, 16, 1Co 1:2; 3:17; 6:1, 2,
19; 7:14, 34; 12:3; 14:33; 16:1, 15, 20; 2Co. 1:1; 6:6; 8:4; 9:1, 12;
13:12, 13; Ep 1:1, 4, 13, 15, 18; 2:19, 21; 3:5, 8, 18; 4:12, 30; 5:3,
27; 6:18; Php 1:1; 4:21, 22; Col 1:2, 4, 12, 22, 26; 3:12; 1Th 1:5, 6;
3:13; 4:8; 5:26; 2Th 1:10; 1Ti 5:10; 2Ti 1:9, 14; Titus 3:5; Philemon
1:5, 7; He 2:4; 3:1, 7; 6:4, 10; 8:2; 9:1, 2, 3, 8, 12, 24, 25; 10:15,
19; 13:11, 24; 1Pe 1:12, 15, 16; 2:5, 9; 3:5; 2Pe 1:18, 21; 2:21; 3:2,
11; 1Jn 2:20; Jude 1:3, 14, 20; Re 3:7; 4:8; 5:8; 6:10; 8:3, 4; 11:2,
18; 13:7, 10; 14:10, 12; 16:6; 17:6; 18:20, 24; 19:8; 20:6, 9; 21:2, 10;
22:11, 19)
There are some 523 uses of hagios in the
Septuagint (LXX)
In the Old Testament
many things and people were divinely set apart by God for His own purposes. The Tabernacle and Temple and
all their furnishings-supremely the Ark of the Covenant and the holy of
holies-were set apart to Him. The tribe of Levi was set apart for His
priesthood, and the entire nation of Israel was set apart as His people.
The tithes and offerings of the people of Israel consisted of money and
other gifts specifically set apart for God. Under the New Covenant,
however, such holy things as the Temple, priesthood, Ark, and tithes no
longer exist. God’s only truly holy things on earth today are His
people, those whom He has sovereignly and graciously set apart for
Himself through Jesus Christ. The new temple of God and the new
priesthood of God are His church.
Hagios is used
throughout the New Testament to speak of anyone or anything that
represents God’s holiness: Christ as the Holy One of God, the Holy
Spirit, the Holy Father, holy Scriptures, holy angels, holy brethren,
and so on. The secular and pagan use pictured a person separated and
dedicated to the idolatrous "gods" and carried no idea of moral or
spiritual purity. The manmade gods were as sinful and degraded as the
men who made them and there simply was no need for a word that
represented righteousness! The worshipper of the pagan god acquired the
character of that pagan god and the religious ceremonies connected with
its worship. The Greek temple at Corinth housed a large number of
harlots who were connected with the "worship" of the Greek god.
Thus, the set-apartness or holiness of the Greek worshipper was in
character licentious, totally depraved, and sinful.
The Bible writers could not coin
new terms since they would not be understood, and were therefore forced
to use those already in use. However, while the technical and root
meanings of this pagan religious term was taken over by the writers, yet
by the use in the NT, the moral and spiritual character was changed and
elevated by the gospel.
Kenneth Wuest writes that...
"The believer in the Lord Jesus is set apart
for God by the Holy Spirit, out of the First Adam with the latter’s sin and
condemnation, into the Last Adam (Christ) with the latter’s righteousness and
life. Thus, the worshipper of the God of the Bible partakes of the character of
the God for Whom he is set apart. This is positional sanctification, an act of
God performed at the moment a sinner puts his faith in the Lord Jesus (1Co 1:2).
The work of the Holy Spirit in the yielded saint, in which He sets the
believer apart for God in his experience, by eliminating sin from his
life and producing His fruit, a process which goes on constantly
throughout the believer’s life, is called progressive sanctification
(1Th 5:23-note). When our Lord sanctifies Himself, He sets Himself apart for God as
the Sacrifice for sin (Jn 17:19, He 10:7-note)."(Ibid)
The idea inherent in hagios
is the taking something filthy, washing it and setting it apart as
something brand new, useful for a different purpose, which is a picture
of salvation for we who were filthy with sin were washed in the blood of
Christ, the Lamb of God, and set apart to now be God's own
possession.
Saints
have been set apart from the
world "delivered
(rescued)...from the
domain of
darkness" (Col 1:11-13) "by the sanctifying work of the Spirit" (1
Pet 1:2) unto God Who "transferred
us to the
kingdom of His
beloved
Son" (Col 1:13)
The fundamental ideas of a saint
include...
One who is separated from sin (cf Ro 6;11,
12, 13, 14-notes)
One who then has the responsibility to choose to consecrate themselves
daily to God
as "living sacrifices" (Ro 12:1-note)
One who is devoted to His service
One who is a partaker of the divine nature (2Pe 1:4-note)
One who continually chooses to abstain from worldly defilement (1Th
4:3-note
1Th 5:22-note,
2Ti 2:19-note,
1Pe 2:11-note)
Although the saint lives in the
world, he or she must always in one sense be
different from the world and continually choose to separate himself or
herself from the world. His standards are not
the world's standards. (click for expository note
on Romans 12:2 regarding not being squeezed into world's mold)
He is "in the world" but not "of the world".
A saint is like a boat -- the boat's purpose is fulfilled when it is in the
water, but it's function and usefulness deteriorates when water gets in
the boat. So too for saints when too much of the world gets into them.
Saints must keep their "vessels" in the water of this word but not let
the water of the world get into their "vessel"! Paul has a parallel
thought writing to young Timothy to take of the truth that
"if a man cleanses himself from these (things, people that have an unholy influence), he
will be a vessel for honor, sanctified (hagiazo - verb form
of saint), useful to the Master, prepared
for every good work." (see note
2 Timothy 2:21)
The term
saints does it refer to a condition after death, for these "saints"
were very much alive at Philippi. Although you may have
been taught that saints are a special, higher order of Christians who
accomplished extraordinary good deeds and lived an exemplary life, the
Bible teaches that sainthood is not an attainment but a state into
which God by grace through faith calls men and women of all stations of
life, whether under the Old or New Covenant. So now next time you meet a
believer, address then as "Saint so-and-so" and watch the
reaction! It goes without saying however that we often do not think or
act like saints, in the popular sense. But hagios speaks of our
identity (or our position) in Christ. We are holy ones in our Lord, even
when we are unfaithful and act unsaintly. Being a saint has nothing at
all to do with one’s degree of spiritual maturity or rank. It refers to
any person who is saved, who is set apart by God for Himself in
His Son Jesus Christ. Because God sees us as He sees His Son, as "those
who have been sanctified (consecrated, purified, made holy) in Christ
Jesus, saints by calling." (1Co 1:2) Like all other believers, the
Christians at Corinth were not saints because of their spiritual
maturity (cf. 1Co 3:1, 2, 3), but because they were
“saints by calling,” a reference to their call to salvation.
Wuest adds
that...
"The word "saint" is the
translation of a Greek word meaning "to set apart," in its verb, and "set
apart ones,"
in its noun form. The pagan Greeks set apart buildings as
temples, consecrating them for non-secular, and therefore, religious
purposes. These became the objects of veneration and reverence. Thus,
saints are believing sinners set apart from sin to holiness, set apart
from Satan to God, thus being consecrated for Gods’ sacred fellowship and
service. The word "saint" as a designation of a Christian, brings at once to
our attention the duty of every believer, that of living a separated life.
The words, "saint, sanctify, holy," are all
translations of this same Greek root. They all speak of the absolute
separation from evil and dedication to God, that must always be true of the
Christian believer." (Ibid)
Matthew Henry
comments that
Saints
are accepted only by virtue of their being
in Christ Jesus,
or as they are Christians. Out of Christ the best saints
(Ed note: are "ain'ts so to speak) will appear sinners, and unable to stand before God.
In other words saint describes every
believer's position in Christ now - set apart from the secular, profane
and evil and dedicated to worship and service of the Living God.
In
Christ Jesus (see studies
on
in Christ
and
in Christ Jesus)- In
is locative of sphere meaning
that their sainthood was in the sphere of Christ but this
"position and privilege" was not due to the fact that someone
called them a "saint" (granting them "sainthood").
There location in this new sphere (Christ) marked them as distinct from
being in the sphere of a pagan deity as the term
was commonly used in the so-called "mystery" religions of Paul's day.
Christ is the sphere in which the believer has his new life and all
his interests and activities. As a goldfish lives and breathes and moves
in the sphere of the aquarium, so too saints live in the sphere and
influence of Christ Jesus their Lord. Stated another way, the believer’s new existence is
circumscribed by Christ our life (Col 3:4-note).
Click for the fifty occurrences of
this phrase "in Christ Jesus" and note who uses this phrase most
frequently!
William
MacDonald
makes an
interesting observation that
In
Christ speaks of their spiritual position.
When they were saved, God placed them in Christ,
“accepted in the beloved.”
(Ep 1:6-note) Henceforth, they had His life and nature
(2Pe 1:4-note).
Henceforth, they would no longer be seen by God as children of Adam
(1Co 15:22) or as unregenerate men, but He would now see them in all the
acceptability of His own Son. The expression in Christ conveys more of intimacy,
acceptance, and security than any human mind can understand. The geographical location
of these believers is
indicated by the expression who are in Colossae (or
Philippi as is the case in this letter). (MacDonald,
W & Farstad, A. Believer's Bible Commentary: Thomas Nelson or
Logos)
As Paul says later For
to me to live is Christ (Php 1:21 -note)
emphasizing that the new life Paul has is actually a person, the Person Christ
Jesus, and the result is a Christ-centered, Christ-like life, a life the
dying world desperately needs to see in the saints!
Guy King in
his exposition of Philippians comments on the phrase in Christ
writing that...
Herein lay
(a) Their protection from evil life. The moral condition of a
heathen city would be a constant peril to any new converts, especially
as they themselves had but just recently come out of that very
heathenism. Philippi may not have been so utterly debased as Corinth, or
Rome, but its atmosphere must have been a subversive influence
threatening any who would live pure and true. Yet, they could be kept
safe. Christians must, of course, remain in such hostile surroundings,
for CHRIST must have there, as Mt 5:13
(note), Mt 5:14
(note)
teaches, the salt, the light, and the testimony.
So He Himself prays "not that Thou shouldest take them out of the world,
but that Thou shouldest keep them from the evil", John 17:15.
That keeping, that protection, is ministered to us in the fact of our
being, not only "in the world", but more closely, "in Christ."
A shipwrecked man writes a message, and throws it into the sea, in the
hope that it may reach some shore. But will not the water damage and
destroy it? No; for, while it is cast into the sea, it is first sealed
in a bottle - and so it arrives. Yes; in Philippi, with all its
destructive influences, but "in Christ" - so they are secure, and so, in
spite of all antagonistic forces, they arrive at "the haven where they
would be." Herein lay also
(b) Their possibility of holy
life. We are called not only to a negative but to a positive life -
"eschew (abstain from) evil, and do good", as 1Pe 3:11
(note)
says. But how can a holy life be lived in such unholy surroundings?
Mark that little water-spider going down to the bottom of that pond. It
doesn't really belong there, even as we believers are: "in the world"
...but not of it, John 17:11, 16. The little creature has the queer, and
amazing, ability of weaving a bubble of air around itself, and hidden in
that it is able to pursue its way even amid such inimical conditions -
in the water, but in the bubble!
So we come back to our glorious truth - in Philippi, but "in Christ";
then even in the midst of the most uncongenial surroundings, the
Christ-life can be lived. (King, Guy: Joy Way: An Exposition of
the Epistle of Paul to the Philippians, 1952, Christian Literature
Crusade) (Bolding added)
As
Wuest writes
Here again we have separation, for
that which surrounds the believer, namely, Christ in Whom he is
ensphered, separates him from all else. (Ibid)
MacArthur notes that
A Buddhist does not speak of himself as in Buddha, nor does a Muslim
speak of himself as in Mohammed. A Christian Scientist is not in Mary
Baker Eddy or a Mormon in Joseph Smith or Brigham Young. They may
faithfully follow the teaching and example of those religious leaders,
but they are not in them. Only Christians can claim to be in their Lord,
because they have been made spiritually one with Him (cf. Ro 6:1, 2, 3,
4,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11).
William Barclay adds
that when Paul spoke of the Christian being in Christ, he meant
that the Christian lives in Christ as a bird in the air, a fish in the water,
the roots of a tree in the soil. What makes the Christian different is that he
is always and everywhere conscious of the encircling presence of Jesus Christ. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press)
Barclay
goes on to explain that
A Christian always moves in two spheres.
He is in a certain place in this world; but he is also
in Christ.
He lives in two dimensions. He lives in this world whose duties he
does not treat lightly; but above and beyond that he lives in Christ.
In this world he may move from place to place; but wherever he is, he
is in Christ.
That is why outward circumstances make little difference to the
Christian; his peace and his joy are not dependent on them. That is
why he will do any job with all his heart. It may be menial,
unpleasant, painful, it may be far less distinguished than he might
expect to have; its rewards may be small and its praise non-existent;
nevertheless the Christian will do it diligently, uncomplainingly and
cheerfully, for he is in Christ and does all things as to the Lord. We
are all in our own Colosse, but we are all in Christ,
and it is Christ who sets the tone of our living." Barclay
describes an ideal state writing that "There is the life that is
dominated by the Spirit of God. As a man lives in the air, he lives in
Christ, never separated from him. As he breathes in the air and the
air fills him, so Christ fills him. He has no mind of his own; Christ
is his mind. He has no desires of his own; the will of Christ is his
only law. He is Spirit-controlled, Christ-controlled, God-focused."
(Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The
Westminster Press)
Boice (in his commentary
on Ephesians) also comments on in Christ noting that...
The phrases in Christ, in Him, or the equivalent occur nine times just in Ephesians
1:3-23. They occur 164 times in all Paul’s writings. The phrases mean
more than just believing on Christ or being saved
by His atonement. They mean being joined to Christ in one spiritual body
so that what is true of Him is also true for us...This is a difficult
concept, and the Bible uses numerous images to teach it to us: the union
of a man and woman in marriage (Ep 5:22-33-
notes),
the union of the vine and the branches (John 15:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17), the wholeness of
a spiritual temple in which Christ is the foundation and we the
individual stones (Ep 2:20, 21, 22 - see notes
Ep 2:20;
21;
22),
the union of the head and other members of the body in one organism
(1Co 12:12-27). But whether we understand it or not, union with Christ
is in one sense the very essence of salvation. John Murray, an able
expositor of this theme, wrote,
Union with Christ has its source
in the election of God the Father before the foundation of the world and
it has its fruition in the glorification of the sons of God. The
perspective of God’s people is not narrow; it has the expanse of
eternity. Its orbit has two foci, one the electing love of God the
Father in the counsels of eternity, the other glorification with Christ
in the manifestation of His glory. The former has no beginning, the
latter has no end. (John Murray, Redemption Accomplished and Applied
(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1955)
Apart from Christ our condition
is absolutely hopeless. In Him our condition is glorious to the extreme.
(Boice,
J. M.: Ephesians: An Expositional Commentary) (Bolding added)
WHO ARE IN PHILIPPI: tois ousin (PAPMPD) en Philippois:
In Philippi
defines the saints temporal, passing, geographic location.
In Christ Jesus
(as discussed in detail above)
defines the saints' eternal, permanent, spiritual location.
In Christ Jesus
describes their position. In Christ Jesus is the intimate, living union
between a believer and his Lord. He is now our life
(Gal 2:20-note,
Col 3:4-note).
He is our strength. He is our sufficiency. He is our all in all. Does
this describe your experience? It is what the Father desires for you.
Vine comments that Philippi (click
for an excellent pictorial tour) was...
a city of Macedonia, the northern province of Greece,
the southern being Achaia. From Neapolis (click
map),
the seaport of the
city, nine miles to the southeast, the road ran over a rocky pass. Philippi
derived its name from Philip of Macedon, who fortified an ancient village called Crenides (Fountains). In 42 b.c. Caesar Augustus granted it the status and
privileges of a Roman colony. Thereupon the inhabitants enjoyed all the rights
of Roman citizenship, such as freedom from arbitrary detentions and penalties.
They had their own senate and magistrates, and were governed according to Roman
law. The officials responsible for order were the strategoi (chief
magistrates Acts 16:35) with
their attendant "sergeants," or lictors (rhabdouchoi, lit. rodbearers). It was
the duty of the latter to scourge criminals with rods of steel at the command of
the magistrates. This was the "beating" recorded in Acts 16:22 (note), and to which
Paul refers in Php 1:30
(note)
and in 1Th 2:2
(see note). The
Egnatian Way, the great Roman road
stretching across the peninsula, lay through Philippi, and enhanced the
commercial and military importance of the city.
The statement in
Acts 16:12 (note) that
it was a city of Macedonia, the first of the district, might, indeed, be
understood to mean that it was the first in the province to be reached by Paul
and his companions, but more probably the reference is to its importance. The
number of Jews in Philippi must have been inconsiderable. There is no mention of
a
synagogue
(ISBE
Article) there, presumably because there were not the ten men necessary to
its constitution. By the riverside, however, the travelers found a
proseuche or "place of prayer," where
the principal, if not the only, persons present were women. There, and in
this modest way, the first gospel campaign in Europe was opened. (Vine,
W. Collected writings of W. E. Vine. Nashville: Thomas Nelson
or
Logos)
A. T. Robertson notes that
Philippi was...
"a colony [kolonia
Acts 16:12]
with all the privileges of Roman citizenship, such as freedom from scourging,
freedom from arrest save in extreme cases, and the right of appeal to the
emperor. This Latin word occurs here alone in the NT. Octavius planted here a
colony of Roman veterans with farms attached, a military outpost and a miniature
of Rome itself. The language was Latin. Here Paul is face to face with the Roman
power and empire in a new sense. He was a new Alexander, come from Asia to
conquer Europe for Christ, a new Caesar to build the Kingdom of Christ on the
work of Alexander and Caesar. One need not think that Paul was conscious of all
that was involved in destiny for the world. Philippi was on the
Egnatian Way,
one of the great Roman roads, that ran from here to Dyrrachium on the shores of
the Adriatic, a road that linked the east with the west."
Dwight Pentecost has an interesting
description of the history of Philippi explaining that...
Rome in its conquest of the Middle East had
been engaged in a war against Macedonia. History tells us the Roman army ran out
of salt, and it was with salt that Roman soldiers were paid. (From this we get
our expression that “a man is not worth his salt.”) The Roman legions threatened
to defect and return home from the battle, which meant Macedonia would remain
unconquered. The people of Philippi preferred to be ruled by the Romans rather
than by the Macedonians, so they collected a great amount of salt and turned it
over to the Roman army, and thus the soldiers were paid. They continued in their
conquest and defeated the Macedonians, incorporating Macedonia into the Roman
Empire. As a reward to the citizens of Philippi, the Roman emperor conferred
upon them the status of a colony. This meant they had the same rights and
privileges as Roman citizens as did the residents of the city of Rome. They were
under the special, protective care of the emperor; they had all the privileges
afforded by Roman law. Like residents of Rome, they were given privileges of
freedom from taxation. They had been made Romans although they lived in
Macedonia. As a consequence, many of the Roman soldiers chose to settle in
Philippi instead of returning to Italy after they had completed their military
service. Thus Philippi became a little Rome: Roman in its loyalties, Roman in
its law, Roman in its philosophy and outlook. It was here the apostle came to
begin to penetrate the continent of Europe with the Gospel of salvation by grace
through faith.
(Pentecost,
J. D. The Joy of Living: A study of Philippians. Kregel Publications)
Rienecker
adds that Philippi was
founded by Philip of Macedonia (whose name the city bore) and the scene of the battle between Crasus and Brutus against Octavian
and Anthony, was located n the Via Egnatia, the famous road between Rome & the East. It had become a Roman
colony (ISBE
article) with libertas (self-governing), immunitas
(freedom from tribute and taxes), lus Italicum (under the
laws of Italy) and was the home of many retired Roman soldiers (Acts 16:12)"
To summarize, Philippi was a
strategic center from which Paul could begin his evangelization of
Europe. It was not not in a center of Greek culture like Athens
nor in a commercial center like Corinth, but a Roman city, that would
facilitate penetration the Roman world (Rome of course being the world
power at that time). Philippi lay in a wide and fertile plain marked by
a multitude of springs and rivers that flowed through it making the land
very productive. The surrounding area had been a center of gold and
silver mining for centuries, and King Philip revived the industry so the
city became prosperous. Philippi was situated at the base of a cut
through the mountains that divided the East from the West, and thus it
became the center of the trade route between Europe and the Middle East
and was a hub of industry and commerce. In the providence of God, Paul
was directed to this city which was ideal city for the first church in
Europe. Luke records God's providential hand in this strategic happening
(e.g., most believers in America are of European descent and most
missionaries to the third world were from European ancestry) writing...
And they (Paul and Timothy who was
selected by Paul in Acts 16:3) passed through the Phrygian and Galatian
region, having been forbidden by the Holy Spirit to speak the word in
Asia; and when they had come to Mysia, they were trying to go into
Bithynia, and the Spirit of Jesus did not permit them; and passing by
Mysia, they came down to Troas. And a vision appeared to Paul in the
night: a certain man of Macedonia was standing and appealing to him, and
saying, "Come over to Macedonia and help us." (Acts 16:6-9)
INCLUDING THE OVERSEERS: sun episkopois:
(Click
here for NT uses of "overseer")
Including
is the Greek preposition
sun which means "with"
and implies a close fellowship and cooperation. It speaks of an intimate
relationship in the mystical body of Christ, the church, with overseers
strategically placed to guard & guide the body.
Overseers
(bishops, guardians)
(1985) (episkopos
from epi = over or upon +
skopos = goal or
end one has in view =
English "scope" as in microscope or telescope) is literally one who looks over closely or intently, who views
carefully. These are the men who were the guardians of the church at
Philippi and were to care for them not as dictators but as spiritual
leaders who provided godly examples (1Pe 5:1,2,3, 4-notes).
Click for some additional insights on
episkopos.
Episkopos is found five times in the NT
- Acts 20:28; Php 1:1; 1Ti 3:2; Titus 1:7; 1Pe 2:25 and 13 times the
Septuagint (LXX)
(Nu 4:16; 31:14; Jdg.
9:28; 2 Ki. 11:15, 18; 12:11; 2 Chr. 34:12, 17; Neh. 11:9, 14, 22; Job
20:29; Isa. 60:17). Here are two representative uses in the
Septuagint...
2 Chronicles 34:17 "They have
also emptied out the money which was found in the house of the LORD, and
have delivered it into the hands of the supervisors (Hebrew = paqad =
attend, visit, look after; Lxx = episkopos) and the workmen."
Isaiah 60:17 "Instead of
bronze I will bring gold, And instead of iron I will bring silver, And
instead of wood, bronze, And instead of stones, iron. And I will make
peace your administrators, And righteousness your overseers.
The
episkopos describes one who superintends, exercises oversight or watches over others,
thus an "overseer" (one looking over another). The Latin equivalent is super-visus, someone
who “looks over” things, a manager. From super-visus comes the English supervisor.
Episkopos properly means an inspector, overseer, or
guardian, and was given to the ministers of the gospel because they
exercised this care over the churches or were appointed to oversee
their interests. In the NT the overseers had the responsibility of oversight
of the body of Christ, serving as the guardians who were to watch over God's
"flock" and lead the sheep by
their godly example. It is important to note that Paul here uses the term in
the plural and that elsewhere this term is used interchangeably with "elder"
(presbuteros).
(Titus 1:5-note) God’s people are
like sheep (see study of
Jehovah Roi
for discussion of sheep) and in need of
shepherds to watch over them, protect them, and lead them. Pray for your
spiritual leaders that they might more and more be what God wants them to
be.
Episkopos was originally a secular title, designating commissioners appointed to
regulate a newly-acquired territory or a colony. It was also applied to
magistrates who regulated the sale of provisions under the Romans. In the
Septuagint (Greek translation of the
Hebrew OT) episkopos signifies "inspectors, superintendents,
taskmasters," (2Ki 11:19; 2Chr 34:12,17) or "captains, presidents," (Neh
11:9,14,22). In the ancient Greek culture episkopos was often
used to describe pagan gods, who supposedly watched over worshipers and over
their nations. (See
Ref article
ISBE)
|
SCRIPTURAL DEFINITION
OF AN OVERSEER
1Timothy 3:2-7 |
|
An overseer, then,
must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate,
prudent, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, 3 not addicted to
wine or pugnacious, but gentle, uncontentious, free from the love
of money. 4 He must be one who manages his own household well,
keeping his children under control with all dignity 5 (but if a
man does not know how to manage his own household, how will he
take care of the church of God?); 6 and not a new convert, lest he
become conceited and fall into the condemnation incurred by the
devil. 7 And he must have a good reputation with those outside the
church, so that he may not fall into reproach and the snare of the
devil. |
MacArthur notes
that
Some have suggested that episkopos derives its sense from the
city administrator, inspector, or financial manager of Greek culture. Its
New Testament usage, however, more closely parallels that of the Essene Jews
of the Qumran community. The overseers among the Essenes preached,
taught, presided, exercised care and authority, and enforced discipline.
Those functions more closely mirror that of the New Testament overseer than
the more narrow use of the term in Greek culture. What are the
responsibilities of the overseer? They are to rule (1Ti 5:17), to preach
and teach (1Ti 5:17), to pray for the sick (Js 5:14), to care for the
church (see notes 1 Peter 5:1; 5:2), to be examples for others to follow
(1Pe 5:1,2-note),
to set church policy (Acts 15:22ff.), and to ordain other leaders (1Ti
4:14).
Oden rightly states that...
Episkopos implies vigilance
far more than hierarchy. (Oden, Thomas C. Pastoral Theology: Essentials
of Ministry)
Wuest adds that
The word (episkopos)
came originally
from secular life, referring to the foreman of a construction gang, or the
supervisor of building construction, for instance. Thayer defines the word;
“an overseer, a man charged with the duty of seeing that things to be done
by others are done rightly, any curator, guardian, or superintendent.” The
word was taken up by the Church, and designated an overseer of any Christian
church. The responsibilities of this office have to do with the oversight
and direction of the spiritual life of the local church.
In
1Peter 2:25
we see the ultimate "Overseer", where
episkopos is used of the Lord
Jesus to describe His care over the souls of His sheep...
For you were continually straying like
sheep, but now you have returned to the Shepherd and Guardian of your souls.
(see note
1Peter 2:25)
Overseers were selected by the
Holy Spirit in (Acts 20:28)
Paul commanding the spiritual leaders of the church at Ephesus to...
Be
on guard (present
imperative = command to do
this continually) for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the Holy
Spirit has made you overseers (episkopos), to shepherd (tend flocks
like a shepherd - oversight, protecting, leading, guiding, feeding) the
church of God which He purchased (more literally "acquired" as His Own
possession) with His own blood.
Paul explained to Titus
that it was vital...
For the overseer (episkopos)
must be above reproach as God's steward, not self-willed, not
quick-tempered, not addicted to wine, not pugnacious, not fond of sordid
gain (See note
Titus 1:7)
Having oversight of the church is no
trivial or light matter, but rather a sobering responsibility, the writer of
Hebrews warning leaders they will he held responsible to God for how
faithfully they have led the sheep...
Obey
(this command is to the "sheep" =
present imperative) your
leaders, and submit
(again the
present imperative commands
continuous placing of oneself under the leadership of the spiritual leaders)
to them; for they keep watch (literally remain sleepless, picturing the
effort necessary to remain on the alert and vigilant) over your souls, as
those who will give an account. Let them do this with joy and not with
grief, for this would be unprofitable for you. (see note
Hebrews 13:17)
James adds that because they teach they face a stricter judgment
Let
not many of you become
(present
imperative) teachers, my
brethren, knowing that as such we shall incur a stricter judgment.
(Js 3:1).
Barclay adds these
thoughts on
episkopos:
"Episkopos is a word with a
great history. In Homer’s Iliad, Hector, the great champion of the Trojans,
is called the episkopos who, during his lifetime, guarded the city of Troy
and kept safe its noble wives and infants.
Episkopos is used of the gods who are the
guardians of the treaties which men make and of the agreements to which men
come, and who are the protectors of house and home. Justice, for instance,
is the episkopos, who sees to it that a man shall pay the price for the
wrong that he has done.
In Plato’s Laws the Guardians of the
state are those whose duty it is to oversee the games, the feeding and the
education of the children that “they may be sound of hand and foot, and may
in no wise, if possible, get their natures warped by their habits.” The
people whom Plato calls market-stewards are the episkopoi who “supervise
personal conduct, keeping an eye on temperate and outrageous behavior, so as
to punish him who needs punishment.”
In Athenian law and administration the
episkopoi were governors and administrators and inspectors sent out to
subject states to see that law and order and loyalty were observed. In
Rhodes the main magistrates were five episkopoi who presided over the good
government and the law and order of the state.
Episkopos is, therefore, a many-sided but always a noble word. It
means the protector of public safety; the guardian of honor and honesty; the
overseer of right education and of public morals; the administrator of
public law and order. So, then, to call God the episkopos of our souls is to
call him our Guardian, our Protector, our Guide, and our Director." Barclay
goes on to state that "The Septuagint, the Greek version of the Hebrew
scriptures, uses it to describe those who were the taskmasters, who were
over the public works and public building schemes (2Chr 34:17). The Greeks use it to describe the men appointed to go out from the mother
city to regulate the affairs of a newly founded colony in some distant
place. They use it to describe what we might call commissioners appointed to
regulate the affairs of a city. The Romans use it to describe the
magistrates appointed to oversee the sale of food within the city of Rome.
It is used of the special delegates appointed by a king to see that the laws
he had laid down were carried out.
Episkopos always implies two
things; first, oversight over some area or sphere of work and
second, responsibility to some higher power and authority." (Barclay,
William: New Testament Words:. Westminster John Know Press, 1964)
In summary, episkopos emphasizes the fact that the leadership is
charged with overseeing the local church and as such is responsible for the
spiritual well-being of those in the church.
The following poem by
George Liddell describes what the character of these men should be like:
Give me a man of God—one
man,
Whose faith is master of his mind,
And I will right all wrongs
And bless the name of all mankind.
Give me a man of God—one man,
Whose tongue is touched with heaven’s fire,
And I will flame the darkest hearts
With high resolve and clean desire.
Give me a man of God—one man,
One mighty prophet of the Lord,
And I will give you peace on earth,
Bought with a prayer and not a sword.
Give me a man of God—one man,
True to the vision that he sees,
And I will build your broken shrines,
And bring the nations to their knees
|
AND DEACONS: kai diakonois:
(Acts 6:1-6;1:1Ti 1:8, 1:10, 1:12, 1:13)
Paul appears to use "deacons" here to refer to a distinct class of officers in the apostolic
church. The origin of this office is recorded Acts 6:1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. It grew out of a
complaint of the Hellenistic or Greco-Jewish members of the Church, that their
widows were neglected in the daily distribution of food and alms. The
Palestinian Jews prided themselves on their pure nationality and looked upon the
Greek Jews as their inferiors. Seven men were chosen to superintend this matter,
and generally to care for the bodily wants of the poor. Their function was
described by the phrase "to serve tables," Acts 6:2, and their appointment left
the apostles free to devote themselves to prayer and the ministry of the word.
Luke records these facts in Acts...
Now at this time while the
disciples were increasing in number, a complaint arose on the part of
the Hellenistic Jews against the native Hebrews, because their widows
were being overlooked in the daily serving of food. And the twelve
summoned the congregation of the disciples and said,
"It is not desirable for us to
neglect the word of God in order to serve tables. But select from
among you, brethren, seven men of good reputation, full of the Spirit
and of wisdom, whom we may put in charge of this task. But we will
devote ourselves to prayer, and to the ministry of the word."
And the statement found approval
with the whole congregation; and they chose Stephen, a man full of
faith and of the Holy Spirit, and Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon,
Parmenas and Nicolas, a proselyte from Antioch. And these they brought
before the apostles; and after praying, they laid their hands on them.
(Acts 6:1-6)
Deacon (1249)
(diakonos)
is a
general term designating a servant, both slaves and hired servants. (Click for in depth study
of the related word
diakonia)
Although
most authorities state that the origin is uncertain, the Greek scholar
Robertson has an intriguing note that
"The etymology (dia, konis)
suggests raising a dust by hastening."
A
diakonos
performed menial and mundane activities, such as waiting on tables or
caring for household needs—activities without apparent dignity. Since such
service necessarily involved dependence, submission, and constraints of time
and freedom, the Greeks regarded this function as degrading and
dishonorable. Service for the public good was honored, but voluntary giving
of oneself in service of one’s fellow man was alien to Greek thought. To the
Greeks, the
highest goal before a man was the development of his own personality. This
thought is strikingly contemporary, and illustrates how a
culture that is focused on self-actualization, achieving one's human
potential and self-fulfillment will find
little value in servant hood.
><>><>><>
Alexander
Maclaren...
Loving Greetings
Phil. 1:1-8
THE bond between Paul and the
church at Philippi was peculiarly close. It had been founded by
himself, as is narrated at unusual length in the book of Acts. It was
the first church established in Europe. Ten years had elapsed since
then, possibly more. Paul is now a prisoner in Rome, not suffering the
extremest rigour of imprisonment, but still a prisoner in his own
hired house, accessible to his friends and able to do work for God,
but still in the custody of soldiers, chained and waiting till the
tardy steps of Roman law should come up to him, or perhaps till the
caprice of Nero should deign to hear his cause. In that imprisonment
we have his letters to the Philippians, Ephesians, Colossians, and
Philemon, which latter three are closely connected in time, the two
former in subject, and the two latter in destination. This letter
stands apart from those to the great Asiatic churches.
Its tone and general cast are unlike those of most of his letters. It
contains no doctrinal discussions and no rebukes of evil, but is an
outpouring of happy love and confidence. Like all Paul’s epistles it
begins with salutations, and like most of them with prayer, but from
the very beginning is a long gush of love. These early verses seem to
me very beautiful if we regard them either as a revelation of the
personal character of the Apostle, or as a picture of the relation
between teacher and taught in its most blessed and undisturbed form,
or as a lovely ideal of friendship and love in any relation, hallowed
and solemnised by Christian feeling.
Verses one and two contain the apostolic greeting. In it we note the
senders. Timothy is associated with Paul, according to his custom in
all his letters even when he goes on immediately to speak in the
singular. He ever sought to hide his own supremacy and to bring his
friends into prominence. He was a great, lowly soul, who had no pride
in the dignity of his position but felt the weight of its
responsibility and would fain have had it shared. He calls Timothy and
himself the slaves of Christ. He regarded it as his highest honour to
be Christ’s born servant, bound to absolute submission to the
all-worthy Lord who had died to win him. It is to be noted that there
is no reference here to apostolic authority, and the contrast is very
remarkable in this respect with the Epistle to the Galatians, where
with scornful emphasis he asserts it as bestowed ‘not from men,
neither through man, but through Jesus Christ and God the Father.’ In
this designation of himself, we have already the first trace of the
intimate and loving relationship in which Paul stood to the
Philippians. There was no need for him to assert what was not denied,
and he did not wish to deal with them officially, but rather
personally. There is a similar omission in Philemon and a pathetic
substitution there of the ‘prisoner of Jesus Christ’ for the ‘slave of
Christ Jesus.’
The persons addressed are ‘all the saints in Christ Jesus.’ As he had
not called himself an apostle, so he does not call them a church. He
will not lose in an abstraction the personal bond which unites them.
They are saints, which is not primarily a designation of moral purity,
but of consecration to God, from whom indeed purity flows. The
primitive meaning of the word is separation; the secondary meaning is
holiness, and the connection between these two meanings contains a
whole ethical philosophy. They are saints in Christ Jesus; union with
Him is the condition both of consecration and of purity.
The Philippian community had an organisation primitive but sufficient.
We do not enter on the discussion of its two offices further than to
note that the bishops are evidently identical with the elders, in the
account in Acts 20 of Paul’s parting with the Ephesian Christians,
where the same persons are designated by both titles, as is also the
case in Titus 1:5, 7; the one name (eider) coming from the Hebrew and
designating the office on the side of dignity, the other (bishop)
being of Greek origin and representing it in terms of function. We
note that there were several elders then in the Philippian church, and
that their place in the salutation negatives the idea of hierarchical
supremacy.
The benediction or prayer for grace and peace is couched in the form
which it assumes in all Paul’s letters. It blends Eastern and Western
forms of greeting, ‘Grace’ being the Greek and ‘Peace’ the Hebrew form
of salutation. So Christ fuses and fulfils the world’s desires. The
grace which He gives is the self-imparting love of God, the peace
which He gives is its consequence, and the salutation is an
unmistakable evidence of Paul’s belief in Christ’s divinity.
This salutation is followed by a great burst of thankful love, for the
full apprehension of which we must look briefly at the details of
these verses. We have first Paul’s thankfulness in all his remembrance
of the Philippians, then he further defines the times of his
thankfulness as ‘always in every supplication of mind on behalf of you
all making my supplication with joy.’ His gratitude for them is
expressed in all his prayers which are all thank-offerings. He never
thinks of them nor prays for them without thanking God for them. Then
comes the reason for his gratitude—their fellowship in furtherance of
the gospel, from the first day when Lydia constrained him to come into
her house, until this moment when now at the last their care of him
had flourished again. The Revised Version’s rendering ‘fellowship in
furtherance of’ instead of ‘fellowship in’ conveys the great lesson
which the other rendering obscures—that the true fellowship is not in
enjoyment but in service, and refers not so much to a common
participation in the blessedness as in the toils and trials of
Christian work. This is apparent in an immediately following verso
where the Philippians’ fellowship with Christ is again spoken of as
consisting in sharing both in His bonds and in the double work of
defending the gospel from gainsayers and in positively proclaiming it.
Very beautifully in this connection does he designate that work and
toil as ‘my grace.’
The fellowship which thus is the basis of his thanksgiving leads on to
a confidence which he cherishes for them and which helps to make his
prayers joyful thanksgivings. And such confidence becomes him because
he has them in his heart, and ‘love hopeth all things’ and delights to
believe in and anticipate all good concerning its object. He has them
in his heart because they faithfully share with him his honourable,
blessed burdens. But that is not all, it is ‘in the tender mercies’ of
Christ that he loved them. His love is the love of Christ in him; his
being is so united to Jesus that his heart beats with the same emotion
as throbs in Christ’s, and all that is merely natural and of self in
his love is changed into a solemn participation in the great love
which Christ has to them. This, then, being the general exposition of
the words, let us now dwell for a little while on the broad principles
suggested by them.
I. Participation In The Work Of Christ Is The Noblest Basis For
Love And Friendship.
Paul had tremendous courage and yet hungered for sympathy. He had
no outlets for his love but his fellow Christians. There had, no
doubt, been a wrenching of the ties of kindred when he became a
Christian, and his love, dammed back and restrained, had to pour
itself on his brethren.
The Church is a workshop, not a dormitory, and every Christian man and
woman is bound to help in the common cause. These Philippians help
Paul by sympathy and gifts, indeed, but by their own direct work as
well, and things are not right with us unless leaders can say, ‘Ye all
are partakers of my grace.’ There are other real and sweet bonds of
love and friendship, but the most real and sweetest is to be found in
our common relation to Jesus Christ and in our co-operation in the
work which is ours because it is His and we are His.
II. Thankful, Glad Prayer Flows From Such Co-Operation.
The prisoner in his bonds in the alien city had the remembrance of his
friends coming into his chamber like fresh, cool air, or fragrance
from far-off gardens. A thrill of gladness was in his soul as often as
he thought on them. It is blessed if in our experience teacher and
taught are knit together thus; without some such bond of union no good
will be done. The relation of pastor and people is so delicate and
spiritual, the purpose of it so different from that of mere teaching,
the laws of it so informal and elastic, the whole power of it,
therefore, so dependent on sympathy and mutual kindliness that, unless
there be something like the bond which United Paul and the
Philippians, there will be no prosperity or blessing. The thinnest
film of cloud prevents deposition of dew. If all men in pulpits could
say what Paul said of the Philippians, and all men in pews could
deserve to have it said of them, the world would feel the power of a
quickened Church.
III. Confidence Is Born Of Love And Common Service.
Paul delights to think that God will go on because God has already
begun a good work in them, and Paul delights to think of their
perfection because he loves them. ‘God is not a man that He should
lie, or the son of man that He should repent.’ His past is the
guarantee for His future; what He begins He finishes.
IV. Our Love Is Hallowed And Greatened In The Love Of Christ.
Paul lived, yet not he, but Christ lived in him. It is but one
illustration of the principle of his being that Christ who was the
life of his life, is the heart of his love. He longed after his
Philippian friends in the tender mercies of Christ Jesus. This and
this only is the true consecration of love when we live and love in
the Lord; when we will as Christ does, think as He does, love as He
does, when the mind that was in Christ Jesus was in us. It is needful
to guard against the intrusion of mere human affection and regard into
our sacred relations in the Church; it is needful to guard against it
in our own personal love and friendship. Let us see that we ourselves
know and believe the love wherewith Christ hath loved us, and then let
us see that that love dwells in us informing and hallowing our hearts,
making them tender with His great tenderness, and turning all the
water of our earthly affections into the new wine of His kingdom. Let
the law for our hearts, as well as for our minds and wills, be ‘I
live, yet not I but Christ liveth in me.’
><>><>><>
F B Meyer...
THE VESTIBULE
OF THE EPISTLE
Php 1:1, 2
Paul and Timotheus, the servants of Jesus Christ, to all the saints in
Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops and deacons:
Grace be unto you, and peace, from God our Father, and from the Lord
Jesus Christ.
THIS is the tenderest of all the Epistles. There is no chiding or
rebuke. It is suffused throughout with words of good cheer, of joy and
peace, though it was written in bonds to which the Apostle makes
frequent reference (Phil. 1:7, 13, 14, 16). There is no trace of
despondency or gloom, and though sent to a Church which he had not
seen for five or six years, there appeared no necessity for those
strictures and reproofs with which the other Epistles are filled.
Date and Occasion of the Epistle. If, as is supposed, this Epistle was
written at the beginning of Paul's imprisonment in Rome, we must
assign to it the date A.D. 62. It is the beginning of the precious
prison literature of the Church which is amongst our greatest
treasures. It was a persecuted Apostle writing to a persecuted Church,
but his soul was unfettered and unchoked by prison damp. Perhaps his
hired house in its discomfort would compare favourably with the gaol
at Bedford, which Bunyan describes as "a den," but the Apostle was
conscious, as Bunyan never was, of the daily clank of the chain which
accompanied every movement.
The occasion of the writing of this Epistle is clearly indicated by
the references which the Apostle makes. Philippi stood at the head of
the AEgean Sea, about nine miles from the coast. Its earliest name was
the Fountain City, afterwards it was enlarged by Philip, the King of
Macedonia, and called after himself. It was the scene of the great
battle between Brutus and Cassius on the one side, and Octavius and
Antony on the other. In commemoration of the decisive victory of
imperialism over republicanism, Augustus gave it the dignity and
privilege of a Roman colony. It was, in fact, a miniature Rome, hence
its consuls and lictors (Acts 16:20). The great Egnatian Way passed
through it; and as a Roman colony situated on this great thoroughfare,
it was flourishing and wealthy, though now it is a desolation, trodden
only by the traveller and shepherd.
The Apostle had been brought there in answer to the vision of the man
of Macedonia, but had met with a poor response. His first sermon was
preached to a few devout Jews, especially women, who, unable to erect
a synagogue, were wont to gather by the riverside on the Sabbath day.
The story of the opening of Lydia's heart, and the subsequent
formation of a Christian Church, which was favoured with two visits on
the part of the Apostle, is too well-known to need detailed retelling.
Epaphroditus, whom the Philippians had sent with their greeting and
pecuniary assistance, had fallen ill during his stay at Rome, and as
the tidings of this misfortune caused great anxiety to his
fellow-disciples, on his recovery the Apostle hastened his return and
entrusted to his care messages of gratitude and affection; hurrying
him back, that by his presence he might dissipate the anxiety which
had cast a gloom over the entire Christian community.
It is sufficient to say that this Epistle has received unmistakable
testimony as to its authenticity and genuineness. It is referred to by
Ignatius and Polycarp, quoted by Clement, Irenaeus, and Tertullian,
and bears in its texture abundant evidence of having issued from the
heart and mind of the great Apostle to the Gentiles.
"Paul and Timothy, bond-servants of Christ Jesus." Years before, when
quite a youth, Timothy had been brought to Christ on Paul's first
visit to Lystra. Having been well instructed by his mother, Eunice,
and his grandmother, Lois, when Christ was presented as the fulfilment
of the Old Testament by Paul, he received Him with all the ardour of
young manhood. The Apostle ever after considered him as "his own son
in the faith." During the seven following years he grew in knowledge
and love, and on Paul's second visit he was judged capable of
accompanying him, and sharing his hardships and labours on behalf of
the Gospel.
The two names are associated in 2 Corinthians, Colossians,
Philippians, and 1 and 2 Thessalonians, and we can never forget the
touching last letter which the Apostle dictated to him from the
Mamertine prison on the eve of martyrdom. It is worthy of notice that
the Apostle, who will presently refer to the saints at Philippi,
classes himself with Timothy as the "bond-slaves of Christ Jesus."
There is no assumption, no priestly prerogative, no pretentiousness in
this simple designation. Though the Apostle had much in which he might
glory, when he reviewed the work of his crowded life, he had so great
an estimate of his Master, Christ, that in His presence he took the
lowliest place;--the bought chattel of Him who had purchased him, not
with corruptible things, but with His precious Blood. Men would have
little fault to find with the ministers of the Churches, if they
breathed the same spirit of simplicity, humility, and abandonment to
the will of the great master.
Saints and Saintship. "To all the saints in Christ Jesus which
are at Philippi, with the bishops (R.V. marg. overseers) and deacons."
The word "saint" is frequently used by the Apostle, in the opening
words of the Epistles. In that to the Romans, he describes believers
as "called to be saints." So in 1 Cor. 1:2, see also Eph. 1:1; Col.
1:2. We are not to infer from this that they were perfect in
character, but that they were set apart from the world, by the cross
of Christ and the anointing of the Holy Spirit, for high and holy
service in the world. Men use this term of the departed, and canonise
their fellow-believers only after many years have elapsed since they
passed to the service of the eternal world. But the Apostle did not
hesitate to describe very imperfect men and women, who needed a large
amount of tuition and admonition, as saints; thus imputing to them
God's great ideal, as perhaps the likeliest means of inspiring them to
deserve the title.
Is not this a true way of dealing with men? Do not be content with
rebuking them when they do wrong, but lay your hand upon their
shoulder, and tell them that you are sure that they are capable of
better things, that the angel lies hidden in the marble, that the
possibility of saintship is deep down in the soul, in virtue of the
regenerating grace of the Spirit, who is forming Christ within. Thus
you will inspire hope, resolve, high purpose, and the resolute
intention that the character and walk shall not fall beneath this
great word with which God does not hesitate to designate all who are
incorporated in a living union with His Son.
Would you be a saint indeed? Then live "in Christ Jesus" as your King
(Christ), and in Jesus in all the human relationship of daily life
(Jesus). Let Him be your atmosphere and environment, your protection
from the assaults of evil from without, and the sweet fragrance which
will exhale through the inner sanctuary of your nature, in speech and
act.
Bishops and Deacons. As to the "bishops and deacons": "There is
now no question," and this is endorsed by Bishop Ellicott, "that in
the Holy Scriptures, the two titles of 'bishop' and 'presbyter' are
applied to the same person." For this see Acts 20:17-28. Bishop
Lightfoot affirms, "It is a fact now generally recognised by
theologians of all shades of opinion, that in the language of the New
Testament the same officer in the Church is called indifferently
'bishop,' or 'elder,' or 'presbyter.'" He goes on to say: "The opinion
hazarded by Theodoret, and adopted by many later writers, that the
same officers in the Church who were first called apostles came
afterwards to be designated bishops, is baseless." According to this
dictum "a New Testament bishop is a New Testament presbyter, and New
Testament bishops and presbyters are simply ministers of Jesus Christ
and pastors of churches."
Dr. Moule in his valuable book, Philippian Studies (Philippians
Commentary),
says: "It is important to remember that our word bishop cannot
properly translate the Greek word as it is used in the New Testament,
for it is not used there as the special title of a superintendent
pastor set over other pastors." For the office of deacon we have
simply to refer to Acts 6. In the early Church there were evident
ranks of gift, but not of grace. As believers gathered at the Lord's
Table, or Love Feast, there was no distinction but that of humility
and service. All were redeemed by the same Blood, stood on the same
level; and each strove to be the lowliest and humblest of all.
The Combined Salutation. "Grace to you and peace from God our
Father and the Lord Jesus Christ." Grace was the western, and Peace
the eastern salutation. The Apostle combines them. He desired that his
absent friends might know more and more of the free favour of God, of
forgiveness and acceptance, and of the enjoyment of help and comfort.
He would also have them know that peace which filled his own heart,
amid trials of no ordinary description, and which was bequeathed by
the Master,--"My peace I leave with you, My peace I give unto you."
Notice how closely he conjoins the Father and the Redeemer. He did not
think that he was robbing God of His unity or supremacy when he
included our Lord in the same sentence. Though all his early training
had recognised the Oneness of the Divine Nature, he had no scruple in
adding to God the Father the Lord Jesus Christ.
It is remarkable to notice also the number of times in which he
mentions the Saviour's name. It occurs forty times in this Epistle,
that is, on an average, in every two or three verses, but this is
characteristic of the New Testament, and especially of the writings of
this Apostle. He was a slave of Jesus Christ; he viewed all saints as
living, with himself, in Christ; his life was full of Christ; Christ
was his life; to die was to depart to be with Him; his rejoicing was
in Christ Jesus; and steadfastness was only possible, as he and his
converts stood fast "in the Lord." The Lord was always at hand to him,
and because all believers were in Christ, they could count on God to
supply all their need.
Let us rejoice to know that "grace and peace" are not exhausted, but
that they flow down to us still in this remote century, and amid the
altered circumstances of modern life. Christ was, and is, and is to
come. In Him the Church still exists, through Him she is still
supplied with grace upon grace, and unto Him she will be gathered
without spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing. (F. B. Meyer. The Epistle
to the Philippians)