|















| |
INDEX
PREVIOUS
NEXT
|
COLLECTIONS
Commentaries, Word
Studies, Devotionals, Sermons, Illustrations
Old and New Testament. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Romans
1:29-31 Commentary |
|
Romans
1:29 being
filled
(RPPMPA)
(permeated & saturated) with
all
unrighteousness,
wickedness,
greed,
evil;
full of
envy,
murder,
strife,
deceit,
malice; they are
gossips
(NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
pepleromenous (RPPMPA)
pases
adikia
poneria
pleonexia
kakia,
mestous
phthonou
phonou
eridos
dolou
kakoetheias,
psithuristas,
Amplified: Until they were filled (permeated and saturated)
with every kind of unrighteousness, iniquity, grasping and covetous
greed, and malice. [They were] full of envy and jealousy, murder,
strife, deceit and treachery, ill will and cruel ways. [They were]
secret backbiters and gossipers, (Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
Barclay:
They are replete with all evil, villainy, the lust to get,
viciousness. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, the spirit
which puts the worst construction on everything. They are whisperers (Westminster
Press)
NLT:
Their lives became full of every kind of wickedness, sin, greed, hate,
envy, murder, fighting, deception, malicious behavior, and gossip. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips:
They became filled with wickedness, rottenness, greed and malice;
their minds became steeped in envy, murder, quarrelsomeness,
deceitfulness and spite. (Phillips:
Touchstone)
Wuest:
being filled with every unrighteousness, pernicious evil, avarice,
malice, full of envy, murder, wrangling, guile, malicious craftiness;
secret slanderers, (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal: having
been filled with all unrighteousness, whoredom, wickedness,
covetousness, malice; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, evil
dispositions; whisperers, |
|
|
|
ROMANS ROAD
to RIGHTEOUSNESS |
Romans
1:18-3:20
|
Romans
3:21-5:21 |
Romans
6:1-8:39 |
Romans
9:1-11:36 |
Romans
12:1-16:27 |
|
SIN |
SALVATION
|
SANCTIFICATION |
SOVEREIGNTY |
SERVICE |
NEED
FOR
SALVATION |
WAY
OF
SALVATION |
LIFE
OF
SALVATION |
SCOPE
OF
SALVATION |
SERVICE
OF
SALVATION |
God's Holiness
In
Condemning
Sin |
God's Grace
In
Justifying
Sinners |
God's Power
In
Sanctifying
Believers |
God's Sovereignty
In
Saving
Jew and Gentile |
Gods Glory
The
Object of
Service |
Deadliness
of Sin |
Design
of Grace |
Demonstration of
Salvation |
|
Power Given
|
Promises Fulfilled |
Paths Pursued |
Righteousness
Needed |
Righteousness
Credited |
Righteousness
Demonstrated |
Righteousness
Restored to Israel |
Righteousness
Applied |
God's Righteousness
IN LAW |
God's Righteousness
IMPUTED |
God's Righteousness
OBEYED |
God's Righteousness
IN ELECTION |
God's Righteousness
DISPLAYED |
|
Slaves to Sin |
Slaves to God |
Slaves Serving God |
|
Doctrine |
Duty |
|
Life by Faith |
Service by Faith |
|
Modified from Irving L.
Jensen's excellent work "Jensen's
Survey of the NT" |
BEING
FILLED: pleroo (RPPMPA):
Note that this
"laundry list" of sins covers the entire gamut of life, be it the
home, the family, marriage, the workplace, the church. No area of life
is left unaffected by man's decision to turn his back on God.
As
Pritchard comments
In a sense, this passage is a comment upon the
doctrine of total depravity. The historic Protestant doctrine uses
phrases such as "spiritually dead, inherently corrupt, incapable of
pleasing God and hopelessly lost" to describe the plight of the human
race apart from Jesus Christ. What does it mean to be "inherently
corrupt?" It means to live in the way Paul has just described.
(When
God Gives Up)
Being
filled
(4137)
(pleroo) (Click word study
pleroo) which indicates more than just
pouring water in a glass up the brim.
(1) pleroo was often used of the wind filling a sail and thereby
carrying the ship along. To be filled with the Spirit then to is to be moved
along in our Christian life by God Himself, by the same dynamic by which
the writers of Scripture were “moved by the Holy Spirit” (2Pe 1:21-note). The
men in (Ro 1:29) are being moved by their depraved minds to do
unspeakable evil.
(2) pleroo also conveys the idea
of permeation as of
salt’s permeating meat in order to flavor and preserve it. The depraved
minds of these men permeated their entire being resulting in the evil
actions Paul lists out for us.
(3) pleroo has connotation of total control. The person who is
filled with sorrow is no longer under his own control but
is totally under the control of that emotion. In the same way, someone
who is filled with fear, anger or even Satan (Acts 5:3) is no longer under
his own control but under the total control of that which dominates him.
God has so given these men over to their debased minds that those minds
totally control their thoughts and actions.
Being filled
is
perfect tense
which speaks of having become filled
and remaining in that state, thus pointing to a state of filling and
controlling. They are completely filled and thus totally
permeated and controlled by an undiscerning rejected worthless mind! This
is a frightening truth: Men shook their fist at their Creator and He
gave them what they lusted for...to be their own god. This is
revelation of God's just wrath against unrighteous man! What a tragic,
grievous picture of MAN APART FROM GOD. Not being controlled by just a
portion of unrighteousness but being filled with ALL UNRIGHTEOUSNESS.
You can mark it down --
Apathy leads to apostasy which brings moral anarchy. Just look at
America in the twenty first century. We see this same pattern of idolatry leading to immorality which leads to internal strife
in the book of Judges, especially the horrible description
of men doing what is right in their own eyes in Judges 17-21).
Haldane notes that being
filled...
signifies that the vices here exposed
were not tempered with virtues, but were alone and uncontrolled,
occupying the mind and heart even to overflowing. (Haldane, R. An
Exposition of Romans.)
Hodge comments on being
filled that...
The Greek construction links this
either with the them of the preceding verse: “he gave them up, filled
with all unrighteousness”; or it depends on the preceding infinitive to
do: “so that they, filled with all unrighteousness, should commit"
It is not connected with gave them over to imply that God gave
them up after they were thus corrupt, but is linked with to do to
express the consequence of God’s abandoning them to do the things which
are not right. The crimes here mentioned were commonplace. The heathen
were full of them (pleroo). They not only abounded, but in many cases
were excused and even justified. Although the picture drawn here is
dark, it is not as dark as that presented by the most distinguished
Greek and Latin authors about their own countrymen. Commentators have
collected a fearful array of passages from the ancient writers, which
more than support the account given by the apostle. What Paul says about
the ancient heathen world is true in all its essential features of men
in all generations. Wherever men have existed, there have they shown
themselves to be sinners, ungodly and unrighteous, and therefore justly
exposed to the wrath of God." (Hodge, C. Commentary on the Epistle to
the Romans, 1835)
So, where do the evils listed in v29-31
come from? It all started back in (Ro 1:18) where Paul gave the reason
for why the gospel of the gift of God's righteousness is so desperately
needed. The gospel is the power of God to save believers because in it
God gives us what we need and could never produce on our own, namely,
His own righteousness. The righteousness that God demands from us He
freely gives to us, if we will but trust Him. This is the great Biblical
truth of justification by faith. So what Paul does in the verses
(Ro 1:18ff) is describe for us the effects of suppressing the truth of
God. He wants us to see all the evil of the world as a river that flows
from this polluted spring. Reject God, suppress God, distort God, recreate God in
your own image to your own liking, and the effect is worse than we
expect. And the thing that is worse than we expect is that God joins our
crusade against God, as it were, and delivers us into the debasing
effects of our own rebellion against him.
WITH ALL UNRIGHTEOUSNESS, WICKEDNESS, GREED, EVIL: pase adikia poneria
pleonexia kakia:
All
(3956)(pas)
means just what it says, all with no exceptions in regard to their
unrighteous conduct! Each one of these sinful attitudes and actions is
"filled to the brim"!
Unrighteousness
(93)
(adikia from a = not + dikê = right) is a condition
of not being right, whether with God, according to the standard of His
holiness and righteousness or with man, according to the standard of
what man knows to be right by his conscience.
In secular Greek adikia
referred to unjust acts, or to deeds which caused personal injury.
Rather than a general concept of injustice, this word was taken, in the
writings of Plato, to mean an unjust act which injures a specific
person. Such an act was not necessarily a violation of some specific
law, but rather an affront against the just order of society. Among the
acts which fell into this category were theft, fraud, and sexual crimes.
Later this word came to mean a neglect of duty toward the pagan gods.
The
Septuagint (LXX)
used this word to describe social sins, those deeds which violated human
relations or the political order of society. Among these injustices were
deceit, fraud, and lying.
Adikia is used 25 times in the
NT - Lk. 13:27; 16:8f; 18:6; Jn. 7:18; Acts 1:18; 8:23; Rom. 1:18, 29;
2:8; 3:5; 6:13; 9:14; 1 Co. 13:6; 2 Co. 12:13; 2Th 2:10, 12; 2Ti
2:19; Heb 8:12; Jas. 3:6; 2Pe 2:13, 15; 1 Jn. 1:9; 5:17
and in the NAS is translated "doing wrong, 1; evildoers, 1; iniquities, 1;
iniquity, 2; injustice, 1; unrighteous, 2; unrighteousness, 12;
wickedness, 4; wrong."
Adikia is used over 200 times
in the
Septuagint (LXX)
-- Ge 6:11, 13; 26:20; 44:16; 49:5; 50:17; Ex 34:7; Lev 16:21, 22;
18:25; Nu 14:18; Dt 19:15; 32:4; Jdg 9:24; 1 Sa 3:13, 14; 14:41; 20:8;
25:24; 28:10; 2 Sa 3:8, 34; 7:10, 14; 14:32; 21:1; 1Ki 2:32; 8:50;
17:18; 2Ki 17:4; 1Chr 17:9; 2Chr 19:7; Job 11:14; 15:16; 33:17; 34:6,
32; 36:10, 18, 33; Ps 7:3, 14, 16; 11:5; 17:3; 27:12; 28:3; 52:2, 3;
55:10; 58:2; 62:10; 66:18; 72:14; 73:6, 7, 8; 75:5; 82:2; 92:15; 94:4;
119:29, 69, 104, 163; 140:2; 144:8, 11; Pr 8:13; 11:5; 15:29; 21:9;
28:16; Is 33:15; 43:24; 57:1; 58:6; 59:3; 60:18; 61:8; Je 2:22; 3:13;
11:10; 13:22; 14:6, 10, 20; 16:10, 18; 18:23; 30:14, 16; 31:34; 33:8;
36:3; 50:20; 51:5, 6; La 2:14; 4:13; Ezek 3:18, 19; 4:4, 5, 6, 17; 7:16,
19; 9:9; 12:2; 14:3, 4, 7, 10; 18:8, 17, 18, 19, 20, 24, 30; 21:23, 24,
25, 27, 29; 22:7, 25, 29; 24:23; 28:18; 33:13; 35:5; 39:26; 44:10, 12;
45:9; Da 4:27; 9:13, 16, 24; 12:4; Ho 4:8; 5:5; 7:1; 8:13; 9:7, 9; 10:9,
10, 13; 12:7, 8; 13:12; 14:1, 2; Joel 3:19; Am 3:10; Jon 3:8; Mic 3:10;
6:10; 7:18, 19; Nah. 3:1; Hab 2:12; Zep 3:5, 13; Zec 3:9; 5:6; Malachi
2:6; 3:7
Barclay writes that...
Adikia is the precise opposite
of dikaiosune (righteousness), which means justice; and the Greeks
defined justice as giving to God and to men their due. The evil man is
the man who robs both man and God of their rights. He has so erected an
altar to himself in the centre of things that he worships himself to the
exclusion of God and man." (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
Larry Richards writes that
adikia
means "wrongdoing,"
"unrighteousness," "injustice." Its focus is on the concept of sin as
conscious human action that causes visible harm to other persons in
violation of the divine standard. (Richards,
L O: Expository Dictionary of Bible Words: Regency)
Nietzsche was not correct when he
pontificated that "might makes right". Only God makes right and only His
standard is acceptable as perfect. All other is "not right"
but is in fact adikia
and no amount of men's "might" makes it "right".
John MacArthur writes that adikia or
unrighteousness
encompasses the idea of ungodliness
but focuses on the result. Sin first attacks God’s majesty and then His
law. Men do not act righteously because they are not rightly related to
God, who is the only measure and source of righteousness." (MacArthur,
J: Romans 1-8. Chicago: Moody Press
or
Logos)
One can derive a good sense for the
meaning of adikia by studying the passages in which it is used. For
example, John
defines adikia writing that "All unrighteousness is sin" (1Jn
5:17) Paul
describes the coming anti-christ whose coming will do the work of Satan
"with all the deception of wickedness (adikia)". (2Th
2:10) Adikia
corrupts the truth and chokes out the truth by its deceitfulness. From
this use in Scripture we can deduce that adikia deceives as well
as suppresses the truth (see Ro 1:18-note). Adikia or
unrighteousness is loving sin more than loving God and His truth. When
the heart is in love with self-exaltation and independence and the
pleasures of sin, the mind will inevitably distort the truth or suppress
the truth in order to protect the idols of the heart. What is needed is
not just new ideas or more information, but a new heart. And a new set
of passions and desires and pleasures. This is what God provides in the
gospel and what Paul is showing men that they are in desperate need of.
Adikia is used to describe people as
well as things. For example, adikia describes an "unrighteous steward'
Lk 16:8,
an "unrighteous judge" Lk 18:6, the tongue or speech of controlled
by the fallen sin nature ("the tongue is a fire, the very world of
iniquity"). (James 3:6) Peter describes Simon the magician (who
was seeking to purchase the effects of the Holy Spirit) as "in
the
gall of
bitterness and in the
bondage of
iniquity (adikia)." (Acts
8:23)
In a similar way these reprobates in Romans 1 are in bondage to their
own unrighteousness, having been turned over by God to the depravity of
their own minds!
Luke records that the traitor Judas
Iscariot "acquired a field with the price of his wickedness
(adikia)." (Acts 1:18). Similarly Peter
warned of the just judgment on false teachers declaring they would
suffer "wrong as the wages of doing wrong (adikia)" (see 2Pe
2:13-note) going on to explain
that these men forsook "forsaking the right way they have gone astray,
having followed the way of Balaam, the son of Beor, who loved the wages
of unrighteousness (he loved to earn money by doing wrong)." (See
2Pe 2:15-note)
Paul asked and answered a
rhetorical (for effect) question...
There is no injustice (adikia)
with God, is there? May it never be!" (Romans
9:14)
In a passage which presents a similar
thought, Jesus in a description of Himself declared
that...
He
who speaks from himself seeks his own glory; but He who is seeking the
glory of the One who sent Him, He is true, and there is no
unrighteousness (adikia) in Him. (John
7:18)
Paul teaches that genuine
Christian (agape) love...
does not rejoice (is never glad
about) in unrighteousness (adikia) but rejoices with the truth" (1
Cor 13:6)
One day future Jesus will declare to
men and women who thought they knew Him
I
tell you, I do not know where you are from; DEPART FROM ME, ALL YOU
EVILDOERS (literally
"workers = ergates" of "iniquity = adikia").' (Luke
13:27)
Believers however are not immune to adikia,
Paul commanding the Roman believers to stop continually (implying that
it was in fact transpiring)...
presenting the members of your body
to sin (the old sin nature inherited from Adam which was made
potentially inoperative when we were co-crucified with Christ) as instruments (describes a tool or implement for preparing
something and then a weapon of warfare) of
unrighteousness (adikia)." (see note
Romans 6:13)
Paul warned that adikia would
be repaid, writing that God would give to
those who are selfishly ambitious
and do not obey the truth, but obey (
present tense -
continually persuaded by or having a settled conviction regarding)
unrighteousness (adikia), wrath and indignation (i.e.,
eternal damnation and separation from the Righteous One)." (see
note
Romans 2:8) The "means" justify
their "end"!
Paul again warns that all are to
be judged who did not believe the
truth, but took pleasure (approved of it, thought well of it, were
well-pleased) in wickedness (adikia)." (2 Thes
2:12) Notice that
the opposite of believing the truth is a life of wickedness.
In his last letter, Paul exhorts...
everyone who names the name of the
Lord
abstain (aorist
imperative - a
command to be obeyed not a suggestion) from wickedness (adikia).
(2 Timothy
2:19)
Comment: Those who
are truly the Lord's are no longer free to sin wantonly, living
licentiously, but are commanded to separate from unrighteousness which
stresses the believer's need for holiness and speaks of each believer's
responsibility. It follows that if one is continually pursuing adikia
they have cause to question the "sure foundation" of their salvation.
God provides a way to deal with
adikia, John recording that...
f we confess our sins, He is
faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all
unrighteousness. (1 John1:9)
Wickedness
(4189) (poneria
[word study]
from poneros from pónos
= labor, sorrow, pain and and poneo = to be involved in work,
labor) refers to depravity, to an evil disposition, to badness or to an
evil nature. Poneria is used in the NT only in the moral and
ethical sense and refers to intentionally practiced ill will.
Kakia (see below) is
another Greek word for evil which speaks more of the vicious disposition
of one's mind (one's ill will or hatefulness, a mean-spirited or vicious
attitude or disposition) whereas poneria pictures the active
exercise of this evil.
Poneria describes the state
of lacking moral or social values (baseness, sinfulness, maliciousness,
malevolence). Poneria is active malice. Poneria is
malevolence, not only doing evil, but being evil. Webster defines
malevolence as the condition which arises from intense often vicious ill
will, spite, or hatred.
Poneria describes
perverseness and denotes the bad instinct of the heart. Poneria is the
general inclination to evil that reigned among the pagans, and made them
practice and take pleasure in vicious and unprofitable actions.
Poneria is found 7 times in
the NT - Matt. 22:18; Mk. 7:22; Lk. 11:39; Acts 3:26; Rom. 1:29; 1 Co.
5:8; Eph. 6:12
Barclay has an interesting
note writing that...
In Greek this word means more than
badness. There is a kind of badness which, in the main, hurts only the
person concerned. It is not essentially an outgoing badness. When it
hurts others, as all badness must, the hurt is not deliberate. It may be
thoughtlessly cruel, but it is not callously cruel. But the Greeks
defined poneria as the desire of doing harm. It is the active,
deliberate will to corrupt and to inflict injury. When the Greeks
described a woman as ponēra they meant that she deliberately
seduced the innocent from their innocence. In Greek one of the commonest
titles of Satan is ho poneros, the evil one, the
one who deliberately attacks and aims to destroy the goodness of men.
Poneros describes the man who is not only bad but wants to make
everyone as bad as himself. Poneria is destructive badness. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
Webster adds some interesting
thoughts on "wicked" (English word being derived from "wicca"
meaning sorcerer) including "morally
very bad, marked by mischief, disgustingly unpleasant, causing or likely
to cause harm, distress, or trouble."
Greed
(KJV "covetousness")
(4124)
(pleonexia
[word study]
from pleíon = more + écho
= to have) (See
word study on
pleonexia) means literally "to have more" and describes a strong desire to acquire more and more material
possessions (the "itch for more").
The Greeks defined pleonexia as “arrogant greediness,” as “the accursed love of
possessing,” as “the unlawful desire for the things which belong to
others.” It is the spirit in which a man is always ready to sacrifice
his neighbor to his own desires. It describes an insatiable desire and
it has been said that you might as easily satisfy it as you might fill
with water a bowl with a hole in it.
Here are the 10 uses on
pleonexia in the NT -- Mk 7:22; Lk 12:15; Ro 1:29; 2 Co. 9:5; Ep
4:19; 5:3; Col 3:5; 1Th 2:5; 2Pe 2:3, 14
Barclay
says that pleonexia...
is built up of two words which mean
to have more. The Greeks themselves defined pleonexia as the
accursed love of having. It is an aggressive vice. It has been described
as the spirit which will pursue its own interests with complete
disregard for the rights of others, and even for the considerations of
common humanity. Its keynote is rapacity. Theodoret, the Christian
writer, describes it as the spirit that aims at more, the spirit which
grasps at things which it has no right to take. It may operate in every
sphere of life. If it operates in the material sphere, it means grasping
at money and goods, regardless of honour and honesty. If it operates in
the ethical sphere, it means the ambition which tramples on others to
gain something which is not properly meant for it. If it operates in the
moral sphere, it means the unbridled lust which takes its pleasure where
it has no right to take. Pleonexia is the desire which knows no law. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos) The basic idea of pleonexia is the desire for that which a man has no right to
have. It is, therefore, a sin with a very wide range. If it is the
desire for money, it leads to theft. If it is the desire for prestige,
it leads to evil ambition. If it is the desire for power, it leads to
sadistic tyranny. If it is the desire for a person, it leads to sexual
sin.
Haldane writes that
pleonexia originally referred to
taking the advantage, overreaching in
a bargain, having more than what is just in any transaction with our
neighbor. Of this, covetousness is the motive. This was universal among
rich and poor, and was the spring of all their actions. (Haldane, R: An
Exposition of Romans) Pleonexia is described as the equivalent of idolatry in
(see exposition of
Colossians 3:5) for covetousness
puts things in the place of God..
C. F.
D. Moule well describes it as "the opposite of the desire to
give."
Evil (2549)
(kakia
[word study]) is deliberate wickedness which takes pleasure in doing
harm. Kakia is the quality of wickedness, with the implication of that
which is harmful or damaging. It is often translated in a narrow sense
for malice, describing a deep-seated feelings against a person that
includes hatred that lasts on and on. It is an intense and long-lasting
bitterness against a person. It is actually wishing that something bad
would happen to a person. Kakia means wickedness, a deliberate intention
to harm (actively plotting revenge; passively mad when they are blessed
and happy when they have misfortune).
Kakia is used 50 times in the
NT -- Mt 21:41; 24:48; 27:23; Mk 7:21; 15:14; Lk. 16:25; 23:22; Jn
18:23, 30; Ac 9:13; 16:28; 23:9; 28:5; Ro 1:30; 2:9; 3:8; 7:19, 21;
12:17, 21; 13:3, 4, 10; 14:20; 16:19; 1Co 10:6; 13:5; 15:33; 2Co 13:7;
Php 3:2; Col 3:5; 1Th 5:15; 1Ti 6:10; 2Ti 4:14; Titus 1:12; Heb 5:14;
James 1:13; 3:8; 1Pe 3:9, 10, 11; 3Jn 1:11; Re 2:2; 16:2
Lightfoot describes kakia as
“the vicious nature which is bent on doing harm to others”
One Greek scholar refers to
kakia as “the vicious character generally.” To varying degrees, but
inevitably, the unsaved person spends his life enveloped in and
motivated by kakia. Larry
Richards writes that
kakia
"is a flaw within us that keeps the
best of us from being what we should be and what we want to be." (Richards,
L O: Expository Dictionary of Bible Words: Regency)
John MacArthur says that...
kakia, denotes moral evil and
corruption in general, especially in regard to intent. It pertains to
sin that is deliberate and determined. It may reside in the heart for a
long time before being expressed outwardly, and may, in fact, never be
expressed outwardly. It therefore includes the many “hidden” sins that
only the Lord and the individual are aware of.
(Macarthur
J. James. Moody or
Logos)
Barclay
writes that
kakia is...
the most general Greek word for
badness. It describes the case of a man who is destitute of every
quality which would make him good. For instance, a kakos kritēs
is a judge destitute of the legal knowledge and the moral sense and
uprightness of character which are necessary to make a good judge. It is
described by Theodoret as “the turn of the soul to the worse.” The
word he uses for turn is ropē which means the turn of the balance. A man
who is kakos is a man the swing of whose life is towards the
worse. Kakia has been described as the essential viciousness
which includes all vice and as the forerunner of all other sins. It is
the degeneracy out of which all sins grow and in which all sins
flourish. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
FULL OF
ENVY, MURDER, STRIFE, DECEIT, MALICE: mestous phthonou phonou
eridos dolou kakoetheias:
Full
(3324)
(mestos) signifies full up, full to the utmost,
"stuffed"! Mestos is generally makes reference to that of or
with which a person or thing is full.
Mestos is used 9 times in NASB (Matt. 23:28; Jn. 19:29; 21:11;
Rom. 1:29; 15:14; Jas. 3:8, 17; 2 Pet. 2:14), most often in a figurative sense
describing being full to the utmost with good and bad moral qualities:
"are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness" Mt 23:28; "full of
goodness" Ro 15:14; "tongue...full of deadly poison" Ja 3:8 , "wisdom
from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, reasonable, full of
mercy and good fruits" Ja 3:17 ; false teachers "having eyes full of
adultery" 2Pe 2:14. The literal uses describe a "jar full of sour wine"
John 19:29 and a "net...full of large fish" John 21:11.
There are 4 uses of mestos in the Septuagint - Esther 5:2; Pr
6:34; Nah 1:10; Ezek 37:1;
Envy
(5355)
(phthonos) is an attitude of ill-will that leads to
division and strife and even murder. (cp
Mt 27:18) Tacitus remarks that
this was the usual vice of the villages, towns, and cities. (Click
for in depth study of
phthonos)
Vine says
Envy
differs from jealousy in that the former desires merely to deprive
another of what he has, whereas the latter desires as well to have the
same, or a similar, thing for itself."
Trench, calls it “the meaner sin” of the two.
Barclay
says
"There
is...envy
which is essentially a grudging thing. It looks at a fine person, and is
not so much moved to aspire to that fineness, as to resent it. It is the
most warped and twisted of human emotions.... a mean word. Euripides
called it “the greatest of all diseases among men". The essence of it is
that it does not describe the spirit which desires, nobly or ignobly, to
have what someone else has; it describes the spirit which grudges the
fact that the other person has these things at all. It does not so much
want the things for itself; it merely wants to take them from the other.
The Stoics defined it as “grief at someone else’s good.” Basil called it
“grief at your neighbor’s good fortune.” It is the quality, not so much
of the jealous, but rather of the embittered mind.” (Barclay, W:
The Daily Study Bible series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press) The godly Scottish
preacher Andrew Bonar penned a diary entry. He wrote, “This day 20 years
ago I preached for the first time as an ordained minister. It is amazing
that the Lord has spared me and used me at all. I have no reason to
wonder that He used others far more than He does me. Yet envy is my
hurt, and today I have been seeking grace to rejoice exceedingly over
the usefulness of others, even where it cast me into the shade. Lord,
take away this
envy
from me!”
F. B. Meyer held meetings in Northfield, Mass., and large crowds
thronged to hear him. Then the great British Bible teacher G. Campbell
Morgan came to Northfield and people were soon flocking to hear his
brilliant expositions of scripture. Meyer confessed at first he was
envious.
He said, “The only way I can conquer my feelings is to pray for Morgan
daily, which I do.”
Dwight L. Moody once told the fable of an eagle who was
envious
of another that could fly better than he could. One day the bird saw a
sportsman with a bow and arrow and said to him, “I wish you would bring
down that eagle up there.” The man said he would if he had some feathers
for his arrow. So the jealous eagle pulled one out of his wing. The
arrow was shot, but it didn’t quite reach the rival bird because he was
flying too high. The first eagle pulled out another feather, then
another—until he had lost so many that he himself couldn’t fly. The
archer took advantage of the situation, turned around, and killed the
helpless bird. Moody made this application: if you are
envious
of others, the one you will hurt the most by your actions will be
yourself.
Envy
- is it a small sin? Pilate knew that for
envy
they had delivered Him. (cp
Mt27:18)
Envy is discontent with, or
mortification at, the knowledge or sight of another person’s superiority
or advantage.
ILLUSTRATION: History tells us of a statue that was erected to
a celebrated victor in the public games of Greece named Theogenes. The
erection of this statue so excited the envious hatred of one of his
rivals that he went every night and strove to throw the statue over by
repeated blows. Ultimately h e succeeded, but alas, the statue fell upon
him, and he was crushed to death beneath it. Such generally is the end
of the man who allows himself to be carried away by the spirit of envy.
(Zodhiates, S. Faith, Love, & Hope: Chattanooga, TN: AMG) Murder
(5408)
(phonos) describes murder, particularly slaughter. It can describe
slaying or killing by the sword. Murder was familiar to them, especially
with respect to their slaves, whom they caused to be put to death for
the slightest offenses.
Barclay
reminds us that
Jesus immeasurably widened the scope
of this word. He insisted that not only the deed of violence but the
spirit of anger and hatred must be eliminated. He insisted that it is
not enough only to keep from angry and savage action. It is enough only
when even the desire and the anger are banished from the heart. We may
never have struck a man in our lives, but who can say he never wanted to
strike anyone? As Aquinas said long ago, “Man regardeth the deed, but
God seeth the intention.” (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
Strife
(2054) (eris) means contention (applies to strife or
competition that shows itself in quarreling, disputing, or controversy;
a point advanced or maintained in a debate or argument; an often
perverse and wearisome tendency to quarrels and disputes), strife
(bitter sometimes violent conflict or dissension; emphasizes a struggle
for superiority rather than the incongruity or incompatibility of the
persons or things involved), wrangling, fighting, discord, quarreling.
Eris describes strife about words for vainglory (ostentatious
pride especially in one’s achievements - all for show) and not truth.
Are not some of these sins like looking in the mirror, even for
believers? I am convicted!
There are 9 uses of eris in the NT - Ro 1:29; 13:13; 1Co. 1:11; 3:3; 2Co
12:20; Gal 5:20; Phil 1:15; 1Ti 6:4; Titus 3:9
Barclay
writes that
strife
is the contention which is born of envy, ambition, the desire for
prestige, and place and prominence. It comes from the heart in which
there is jealousy. If a man is cleansed of jealousy, he has gone far to
being cleansed of all that arouses contention and strife. It is
God-given gift to be able to take as much pleasure in the successes of
others as in one’s own. (Ibid
or
Logos)
Deceit (1388) (dolos which
is derived from dello meaning to bait) literally refers to a
fishhook, trap, or trick all of which are various forms of deception.
Dolos is a
deliberate attempt to mislead, trick, snare or "bait" (baiting the trap
in attempt to "catch" the unwary victim) other people by telling lies. It is a
desire to gain advantage or preserve position by deceiving others. A
modern term in advertising is called "bait and switch" where the unwary
consumer is lured in by what looks like an price too good to be true!
Dolos is used 36 times in the
Septuagint (LXX)
(Ge 27:35; 34:13; Exod. 21:14; Lev. 19:16; Deut. 27:24; 2 Ki. 9:23; Job
13:7, 16; 15:35; 31:5; Ps. 10:7; 24:4; 32:2; 34:13; 35:20; 36:3; 52:2;
55:11; Prov. 10:10; 12:5, 20; 16:28; 26:23f, 26; Isa. 9:5; 53:9; Jer.
5:27; 9:6; Ezek. 35:5; Dan. 8:25; 11:23; Mic. 6:11; Zeph. 1:9) and 9
times in the NT...
Matthew 26:4 and they plotted
together to seize Jesus by stealth, and kill Him.
Mark 7:21 "For from within,
out of the heart of men, proceed the evil thoughts, fornications,
thefts, murders, adulteries,
Mark 14:1 Now the Passover and
Unleavened Bread was two days off; and the chief priests and the scribes
were seeking how to seize Him by stealth, and kill Him;
John 1:47 Jesus saw Nathanael
coming to Him, and said of him, "Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is
no guile!"
Acts 13:10 and said, "You who
are full of all deceit and fraud, you son of the devil, you enemy of all
righteousness, will you not cease to make crooked the straight ways of
the Lord?
Romans 1:29
(note) being filled
with all unrighteousness, wickedness, greed, evil; full of envy, murder,
strife, deceit, malice; they are gossips,
2 Corinthians 12:16 But be
that as it may, I did not burden you myself; nevertheless, crafty fellow
that I am, I took you in by deceit.
1
Thessalonians 2:3
(note) For
our exhortation does not come from error or impurity or by way of
deceit;
1 Peter 2:1 (note)
Therefore, putting aside all malice and all guile and hypocrisy and envy
and all slander, 22 who committed no sin, nor was any deceit found in
His mouth;
1 Peter 3:10 (note)
For, "Let him who means to love life and see good days Refrain his
tongue from evil and his lips from speaking guile.
The related verb dolioo (1387)
is used in Romans 3:13 where Paul indicts all mankind writing that
THEIR THROAT IS AN OPEN GRAVE, WITH
THEIR TONGUES THEY KEEP DECEIVING," "THE POISON OF ASPS IS UNDER
THEIR LIPS.
Larry Richards explains that
dolos...
picks up the metaphor from hunting
and fishing. Deceit is an attempt to trap or to trick and thus
involves treachery...Deception sometimes comes from within, as our
desires impel us to deceive. But more often in the NT, deceit is error
urged by external evil powers or by those locked into the world's way of
thinking. (Richards,
L O: Expository Dictionary of Bible Words: Regency)
Barclay
writes that...
"We best get the meaning of this from the corresponding verb (doloun).
Doloun has two characteristic usages. It is used of debasing
precious metals and of adulterating wines. Dolos is deceit; it
describes the quality of the man who has a tortuous and a twisted mind,
who cannot act in a straightforward way, who stoops to devious and
underhand methods to get his own way, who never does anything except
with some kind of ulterior motive. It describes the crafty cunning of
the plotting intriguer who is found in every community and every
society." In another writing Barclay explains that dolos can be
translated "guile" and that "It comes from a word which means bait;
it is used for trickery and deceit. It is used for instance of a
mousetrap. When the Greeks were besieging Troy and could not gain
entry, they sent the Trojans the present of a great wooden horse, as if
it was a token of good will. The Trojans opened their gates and took it
in. But the horse was filled with Greeks who in the night broke out and
dealt death and devastation to Troy. That exactly is dolos. It is
crafty, cunning, deceitful, clever treachery. Dolos is the
trickery of the man who is out to deceive others to attain his own ends,
the vice of the man whose motives are never pure. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
DECEIT (Naves)
Is a lie, Ps 119:118.
The tongue an instrument of, Ro 3:13.
Comes from the heart, Mark 7:22.
Characteristic of the heart, Jer 17:9.
God abhors, Ps 5:6.
Forbidden, Pr. 24:28; 1Pe 3:10.
Christ was perfectly free from, Is 53:9, with 1Pet. 2:22.
Saints free from, Ps 24:4; Zeph 3:13;
Re 14:5; purpose against, Job 27:4; avoid, Job 31:5; shun those addicted
to, Ps 101:7; pray for deliverance from those who use, Ps 43:1; 120:2;
delivered from those who use, Ps 72:14; should beware of those who
teach, Eph. 5:6; Col. 2:8; should lay aside, in seeking truth, 1Pe 2:1.
Ministers should lay aside, 2Co 4:2;
1Th. 2:3.
The wicked are full of, Ro 1:29; devise, Ps. 35:20; 38:12; Pr. 12:5;
utter, Psa. 10:7; 36:3; work, Pr. 11:18; increase in, 2Ti 3:13; use, to
each other, Je 9:5; use, to themselves, Je 37:9; Obad. 3, 7; delight in,
Pr 20:17.
False teachers are workers of, 2Co
11:13; preach, Je 14:14; 23:26; impose on others by, Ro 16:18; Eph.
4:14; reveling in deceit, 2Pe 2:13.
Hypocrites devise, Job 15:35.
Hypocrites practice, Ho 11:12.
False witnesses use, Pr. 12:17.
A characteristic of antichrist, 2Jn 7.
Characteristic of the apostasy, 2Th. 2:10.
Evil of: hinders knowledge of God, Je 9:6.
Keeps from turning to God, Je 8:5.
Leads to pride and oppression, Je 5:27, 28; to lying, Pr 14:25.
Often accompanied by fraud and
injustice, Ps 10:7; 43:1.
Hatred often concealed by, Pr 26:24, 25, 26.
The folly of fools is, Pr. 14:8.
The kisses of an enemy are, Pr. 27:6.
Blessedness of being free from, Ps 24:4, 5; 32:2.
Punishment of, Ps 55:23; Je 9:7, 8, 9
DECEIT [ISBE] - de-set'
(mirmah; dolos): The intentional misleading or beguiling of another; in
Scripture represented as a companion of many other forms of wickedness,
as cursing (Ps 10:7), hatred (Pr 26:24), theft, covetousness, adultery,
murder (Mk 7:22; Ro1:29). The Revised Version (British and American)
introduces the word in Pr 14:25; 2Th 2:10; but in such passages as Ps
55:11; Pr 20:17; 26:26; 1Th 2:3, renders a variety of words, more
accurately than the King James Version, by "oppression," "falsehood,"
"guile," "error."
Malice
(2550) (kakoetheia from kakós = bad, evil + ethos = disposition)
is used only here in the NT and refers to the person who has an ill-nature,
taking everything with an evil connotation and giving a malicious
interpretation to the actions of others, a nature which is evil and
makes one suspect evil in others.
Haldane writes that
kakoetheia
in the original, when resolved into
its component parts, literally signifies bad custom or disposition, yet
it generally signifies something more specific, and is with sufficient
propriety rendered malignity, which is a desire to hurt others without
any other reason than that of doing evil to them, and finding pleasure
in their sufferings. The definition of the term, as quoted from
Aristotle by Dr. Macknight, seems true rather as a specification than as
a definition. It “is a disposition,” he says, “to take everything in
the worst sense.” (Haldane, R.: An Exposition of Romans)
Barclay
describes these unrighteous people as possessed of
The spirit which puts the worst
construction on everything (kakoetheia). Kakoetheia means
literally evil-naturedness. At its widest it means malignity. Aristotle
defined it in a narrower sense which it has always retained. He said it
was “the spirit which always supposes the worst about other people.”
Pliny called it “malignity of interpretation.” Jeremy Taylor said that
it is “a baseness of nature by which we take things by the wrong
handle, and expound things always in the worst sense.” It may well be
that this is the commonest of all sins. If there are two possible
constructions to be put upon the action of any man, human nature will
choose the worse. It is terrifying to think how many reputations have
been murdered in gossip over the teacups, with people maliciously
putting a wrong interpretation upon a completely innocent action. When
we are tempted so to do, we ought to remember that God hears and
remembers every word we speak. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
Instances of malice in the
Scripture
Cain toward Abel, Ge 4:8.
Ishmael toward Sarah, Ge 21:9.
Sarah toward Hagar, Ge 21:10.
Philistines toward Isaac, Ge 26.
Esau toward Jacob, Ge 27:41.
Joseph's brethren toward Joseph, Ge 37; 42:21.
Potiphar's wife toward Joseph, Ge 39:14-20.
Ammonites toward the Israelites, Deut. 23:3, 4.
Saul toward David, 1 Sam. 18:8-29; 19; 20:30-33; 22:6-18; 23:7-23;
26:18.
David toward Michal, 2 Sam. 6:21, 22, 23; toward Joab, 1Ki 2:5, 6;
Shimei, 1Ki 2:8, 9.
Shimei toward David, 2 Sam. 16:5-8.
Ahithophel toward David, 2 Sam. 17:1, 2, 3.
Jezebel toward Elijah, 1 Kin. 19:1, 2.
Ahaziah toward Elijah, 2 Kin. 1.
Jehoram toward Elisha, 2 Kin. 6:31.
Samaritans toward the Jews, Ezra 4; Neh. 2:10; 4; 6.
Haman toward Mordecai, Esther 3:5-15; 5:9-14.
Jeremiah's enemies, Jer. 26:8-11; 38.
Nebuchadnezzar toward Zedekiah, Jer. 52:10, 11.
Daniel's enemies, Dan. 6:4-9.
Herodias toward John, Matt. 14:3-10; Mark 6:24, 25, 26, 27, 28.
Herod toward Jesus, Luke 23:11.
The Jews toward Jesus, Matt. 27:18; Mark 12:12; 15:10; Luke 11:53, 54.
James and John toward the Samaritans, Luke 9:54.
Jews toward Paul, Acts 17:5; 23:12; 25:3.
Masters of the slave girl who had a spirit of divination toward Paul,
Acts 16:19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24.
MALICE, MALIGNITY [ISBE] -
mal'-is, ma-lig'-ni-ti (kakia, poneros, kakoetheia): "Malice," now used
in the sense of deliberate ill-will, by its derivation means badness, or
wickedness generally, and was so used in Older English. W. L. Walker
THEY ARE GOSSIPS: psithuristas:
(Ps 41:7; Pr 16:28; 26:20; 2Co
12:20)
Gossips
(whisperers, secret slanderers)
(5588)
(psithuristes) is found only here in the NT and describes an evil tongue which secretly conveys information, whether true or false
and which is
detrimental to the character or welfare of others. This is the man or
woman who pours their poison against their neighbor by whispering into
the ear.
Haldane writes that...
The person spoken against may as well
be absent. It refers to that sort of evil speaking which is communicated
in secret, and not spoken in society. It is called whispering, not from
the tone of the voice, but from the secrecy. It is common to speak of a
thing being whispered, not from being communicated in a low voice, but
from being privately spoken to individuals. It refers to sowing
divisions. It is one of the most frequent and injurious methods of
calumny (a misrepresentation intended to blacken another’s reputation),
because, on the one hand, the whisperer escapes conviction of falsehood,
and, on the other, the accused has no means of repelling the secret
calumny. (Haldane, R. An exposition of Romans)
Barclay
adds that whisperers (gossips) (Psithuristes) and
slanderers (katalalos)
"both describe people with
slanderous tongues; but there is a difference between them. Katalalos,
slanderer, describes the man who trumpets his slanders abroad; he quite
openly makes his accusations and tells his tales whereas Psithuristes
describes the man who whispers his malicious stories in the listeners
ear, who takes a man apart into a corner and whispers a
character-destroying story. Both are bad, but the whisperer is the
worse. A man can at least defend himself against an open slander,
but he is helpless against the secret whisperer who delights in
destroying reputations."(Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
Gossip [NAVE]
Forbidden
Lev. 19:16; Psa. 15:1-3; Psa. 50:20; Prov. 11:13; Prov. 16:28; Prov.
17:9; Prov. 18:8; Prov. 20:19; Prov. 26:20-22; Ezek. 22:9; 1 Tim. 5:11,
13 See: Busybody; Slander; Speaking, Evil.
Instances of
Joseph, Gen. 37:2.
Israelites, 2 Sam. 3:23.
Tobiah, Neh. 6. |
|
|
Romans 1:30 slanderers,
haters of God,
insolent,
arrogant,
boastful,
inventors of
evil,
disobedient to
parents,
(NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
katalalous,
theostugeis,
hubristas,
huperephanous
alazonas,
epheuretas
kakon,
goneusin
apeitheis,
Amplified:
Slanderers, hateful to and hating God, full of insolence, arrogance,
[and] boasting; inventors of new forms of evil, disobedient and
undutiful to parents. (Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
Barclay:
slanderers, haters of God. They are insolent men, arrogant, braggarts,
inventors of evil things, disobedient to their parents (Westminster
Press)
NLT:
They are backstabbers, haters of God, insolent, proud, and boastful.
They are forever inventing new ways of sinning and are disobedient to
their parents. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips:
They became whisperers-behind-doors, stabbers-in-the-back, God-haters;
they overflowed with insolent pride and boastfulness, and their minds
teemed with diabolical invention. They scoffed at duty to parents, (Phillips:
Touchstone)
Wuest:
backbiters; hateful to God, insolent, haughty; swaggerers, inventors
of evil things; disobedient to parents, (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal:
evil-speakers, God-haters, insulting, proud, boasters, inventors of
evil things, disobedient to parents, |
|
|
SLANDERERS,
HATERS OF GOD: katalalous theostugeis:
(Pr 25:23) (haters Ro 8:7,8; Nu 10:35; Deut 7:10; 2Chr 19:2; Ps 81:15;
Pr 8:36; Jn 7:7; Jn 15:23,24; Titus 3:3)
Slanderers
(2637) (KJV = "backbiting") (katalalos from katá =
against + laléo = speak) is found only here in the NT and describes those who speak evil
against of others with the intent to injure the one spoken about.
(See also Barclay's note in attached to "gossips"). A
slanderer is one who "blackens" publically.
Backbiting
involves an element of deceit and cowardice.
One dictionary has this definition of backbiting:
To slander the absent, like a dog
biting behind the back where one cannot see; to go about as a
talebearer. (Orr,
J, et al: The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: 1915)
Backbiters seek to
ruin or defame someone’s character—they are vilifers of character.
Haldane has a long note on katalalos
writing that...
The original word is here
improperly translated backbiters. Dr. Macknight equally misses
the meaning of this term, which he translates “revilers,”
distinguishing it from whisperers, or “persons who speak evil of others
to their face,” giving them opprobrious language and bad names. The
word indeed includes such persons; but it applies to evil speaking in
general,—to those, in short, who take a pleasure in scandalizing their
neighbors, without any reference to the presence or absence of those who
are spoken against; and it by no means designates, as he says, the
giving of “opprobrious language and bad names.” Such persons are
included in it, but not designated by it.
Whisperers or tattlers are
evil–speakers, without any peculiar distinction. Our translators have
erred in rendering it backbiters. As Dr. Macknight has no
authority to limit the word to what is spoken face to face, it is
equally unwarrantable to confine it to what is spoken in the absence of
those who are spoken against. The word translated “whisperers” refers,
according to Mr. Tholuck, to a secret, and the word translated
“backbiters,” to an open slander. Secrecy is undoubtedly the
characteristic of the first word, but the last is not distinguished from
it by contrast, as implying publicity; on the contrary, the former class
is included in the latter, though here specifically marked. Besides,
though the communication of both the classes referred to may usually be
slander, yet it appears that the signification is more extensive.
Whisperers, as speakers of evil, may be guilty when they speak nothing
but truth. Mr. Stuart has here followed Mr. Tholuck. The former he makes
a slander in secret, the latter a slander in public. It is not necessary
that all such persons should be slanderers, and the evil–speaking of the
latter may be in private as well as in public. (Haldane, R. An
Exposition of Romans)
Haters of God
(2319)
(theostuges from Theos = God + stugeo = hated,
odious, hateful) means hateful to God or impious. This is the only NT
use of theostuges. The ancient Greeks
used to call theostuges someone who turned against God. When any
heavy calamity befell such a person, He would accuse God and His
providence.
Godet writes that
theostuges is...
the highest manifestation of pride,
which cannot brook the thought of this superior and judge; one might
say: the most monstrous form of calumny (the malediction of Providence)
Regarding haters of God Haldane writes that...
The charge is applicable to the
whole heathen world, who hated God, and therefore did not like to keep
Him in remembrance. This was manifest throughout the world in the early
introduction of Polytheism and idolatry. No other cause can be assigned
for the nations losing the knowledge of the true God. They did not like
to retain Him in their knowledge. Had men loved God, He would have been
known to them in all ages and all countries. Did not mankind receive a
sufficient lesson from the flood? Yet such was their natural enmity to
God, that they were not restrained even by that awful manifestation of
Divine displeasure at forgetfulness of the Almighty. Although no one
will acknowledge this charge to be applicable to himself, yet it is one
which the Spirit of God, looking deeply into human nature, and
penetrating the various disguises it assumes, brings home to all men in
their natural state. “The carnal mind is enmity against God.” They
hate His holiness, His justice, His sovereignty, and even His mercy in
the way in which it is vouchsafed (granted or furnished in a gracious or
condescending manner). The charge here advanced by the Apostle against
the heathens was remarkably verified, when Christianity, on its first
appearance among them, was so violently opposed by the philosophers and
the whole body of the people, rich and poor, learned and unlearned. This
melancholy fact is written in the history of the persecutions of the
early Christians in characters of blood. (Haldane, R. An Exposition of
Romans)
Adam Clarke has an interesting note writing that the...
Styx, was a feigned river in
hell by which the gods were wont to swear, and if any of them falsified
this oath he was deprived of his nectar and ambrosia for a hundred
years; hence the river was reputed to be hateful, and stugeo
signified to be as hateful as hell." (Clarke,
Adam: Clarke's Commentary
)
INSOLENT,
ARROGANT, BOASTFUL: hubristas huperephanous alazonas:
(boasters
Ro 2:17,23; 3:27; 1Ki 20:11; 2Chr
25:19; Ps 10:3; 49:6; 52:1; 94:4; 97:7; Ac 5:36; 2Co 10:15; 2Th2:4;
James 3:5; 4:16; 2Pe 2:18; Jude 1:16)
Insolent
(5197) (hubristes from
hubrizo = act with insolence +
hubris = arrogance,
primarily denotes wantonness, insolence; then, an act of wanton
violence, an outrage, injury) refers to an insolent persecutor of others. It is the
man who is violent, insolent (insultingly contemptuous in speech or
conduct) and who mistreats from the pleasure which affliction of wrong
brings him. Hubristes is used only one other time in the NT where Paul
describes his pre-conversion condition as a "violent aggressor"
(hubristes) (1Timothy 1:13)
There are uses of
hubristes
in the non-apocryphal Septuagint - Job 40:11; Pr 15:25; 16:19; 27:13; Is
2:12; 16:6; Je 51:2
Godet observes that...
To insolence toward God (the sin of
hubris among the Greeks) there is naturally joined insult offered
to men: hubristes, insolent, despiteful. The
Greek word hubristes gives rise to our English word hubris which is defined as exaggerated pride, self-confidence or
arrogance and in the Greek tragedies referred to an excess of ambition,
pride, etc., which ultimately caused the transgressor’s ruin.
Haldane writes that
hubristes...
always implies contempt, and
usually reproach. Often, treatment violent and insulting...This vice
aims at attaching disgrace to its object; even in the injuries it
commits on the body, it designs chiefly to wound the mind. It well
applies to hootings, hissings, and peltings of a mob, in which, even
when the most dignified persons are the objects of attack, there is some
mixture of contempt. (Haldane, R An Exposition of Romans)
Barclay
adds that
Hubris was
to the Greek the vice which supremely courted destruction at the hand of
the gods. It has two main lines of thought in it. (1) It describes the
spirit of the man who is so proud that he defies God. It is the insolent
pride that goes before a fall. It is the forgetting
that man is a
creature. It is the spirit of the man who is so confident in his wealth,
his power and his strength that he thinks that he can live life alone.
(2) It describes the man who is wantonly and sadistically cruel and
insulting. Aristotle describes it as the spirit which harms and grieves
someone else, not for the sake of revenge and not for any advantage that
may be gained from it, but simply for the sheer pleasure of hurting.
There are people who get pleasure from seeing someone wince at a cruel
saying. There are people who take a devilish delight in inflicting
mental and physical pain on others. That is hubris; it is the
sadism which finds delight in hurting others simply for the sake of
hurting them. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
Arrogant
(5244)
(huperephanos
from huper = over, above, +
phaíno = shine) is the haughty person pictured with his head held
high above others.
The man who is huperephanos is
the one who shows himself above.
This man who because of his feeling
of personal superiority, regards others with haughtiness. He is puffed
up with a high opinion of himself, and thus regards others with
contempt, as if they were unworthy of any social interactions. The noun
huperephania
is usually translated pride which is one of those sins which Jesus says
proceeds out of a man's heart (Mark 7.22 = only NT use of huperephania).
There are 5 uses of huperephanos
in the NT...
Luke 1:51 "He has done mighty
deeds with His arm; He has scattered those who were proud in the
thoughts of their heart.
Romans 1:30 slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful,
inventors of evil, disobedient to parents,
2Timothy 3:2-note
For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, boastful, arrogant,
revilers, disobedient to parents, ungrateful, unholy,
James 4:6-note
But He gives a greater grace. Therefore it says, "God is opposed to the
proud, but gives grace to the humble."
1Peter 5:5 You younger men, likewise, be subject to your elders; and all
of you, clothe yourselves with humility toward one another, for God is
opposed to the proud, but gives grace to the humble.
Barclay adds that
huperephanos...
literally means one who shows
himself above other people. Even the Greeks hated this pride.
Theophrastus described it as “a certain contempt for all other people.”
Theophylact, the Christian writer, called it “the citadel and summit of
all evils.” The real terror of this pride is that it is a
thing of the heart. It certainly means haughtiness, but the man who
suffers from it might well appear to be walking in downcast humility,
while all the time there was in his heart a vast contempt for all his
fellow-men. This pride shuts itself off from God for three reasons. (i)
It does not know its own need… It walks in proud self-sufficiency. (ii)
It cherishes its own independence. It will be beholden to no man; it
will not even be beholden to God… (iii) It does not recognize its
own sin… A pride like that cannot receive help, because it does not know
that it needs help, and, therefore, it cannot ask. It loves, not God,
but itself. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
In his book New Testament Words,
Barclay adds that...
THE
words huperephania and huperephanos are not very common in
the NT, but they describe one of the gravest and most basic sins in
human nature... It does not so much mean the man who is conspicuous and
to whom others look up, as the man who stands on his own little
self-created pedestal and looks down. The characteristic of the man who
is huperephanos is that he looks down on everyone else, secure in his
own arrogant self-conceit....We can see already that huperephania is an
ugly sin; we must go on to look at it in two of its most characteristic
manifestations.
(i) Huperephania and wealth were apt to go hand in hand. Riches and
possessions have a way of begetting arrogance and pride. Stobaeus
preserves a fragment of a writer called Callicratides: 'It is inevitable
that those who have great possessions should become inflated with pride;
then that being inflated with pride they should become boastful
(alazon); then that being boastful they should be-come arrogant
(huperephanos), and think that there is no one like themselves' (Stobaeus,
85.15)...
(ii) But huperephania can go even further than that. Huperephania can
become the pride and arrogance which in the end despise
God....Huperephania is the spirit which despises men and lifts itself
arrogantly against God. No wonder Theophylact called huperephania the
acropolis kakon, the peak of evils. This pride can come from pride
in birth, from pride in wealth, from pride in knowledge, from
aristocratic pride, from intellectual pride, from spiritual pride. It is
described by Trench as 'human nature in battle array against God'.
Alazon [word study]
describes the boaster, the man who shouts his claims and
pretensions so that all can hear. But huperephania is worse that that,
for the seat of huperephanoa is in the heart. The blustering, boasting
alazon is plain for all to see; but the huperephanos is the man who
might well go about the world with downcast eyes and folded hands and
with out-ward quietness, but with a silent contempt within his heart for
his fellow-men; the huperephanos is the man who might walk in outward
humility, but in inward pride. His basic sin is that he has forgotten
that he is a creature and that God is the Creator; for the huperephanos
has erected an altar to himself within his own heart, and worships
there. ( William
Barclay. New Testament Words)
NIDNTT adds that...
The adjective hyperephanos (Hesiod
onwards) usually means arrogant, proud; occasionally, prodigal. It also
has a positive use (e.g. in Plato): magnificent. The writers of the
classical period also used the noun hyperephania in the sense of pride,
arrogance,
contempt.
(Brown,
Colin, Editor. New International Dictionary of NT Theology. 1986.
Zondervan)
Huperephanos is
used much more frequently in the
Septuagint (LXX)...where we
encounter 20 occurrences - Esther 4:17; Job 38:15; 40:12; Ps 18:27;
89:10; 94:2; 101:5; 119:21, 51, 69, 78, 122; 123:4; 140:5; Pr 3:34; Isa
1:25; 2:12; 13:11; 29:20; Zeph 3:6. Here are most of the uses, a study
of which helps one discern the characteristics of
huperephanos...
Job
40:12 "Look on everyone who is
proud,
and humble him; And tread down the wicked where they stand.
Psalm
18:27-note
For Thou dost save an afflicted people; but
haughty
eyes Thou dost abase.
Spurgeon:
Those who look down on others with scorn shall be looked down upon with
contempt ere long. The Lord abhors a proud look. What a reason for
repentance and humiliation! How much better to be humble than to provoke
God to humble us in his wrath! A considerable number of clauses occur in
this passage in the future tense; how forcibly are we thus brought to
remember that our present joy or sorrow is not to have so much weight
with us as the great and eternal future!
High looks:
namely, the proud; the raising up of the eyebrows being a natural sign
of that vice. Psalms 101:5 Proverbs 6:17. John Diodati.
Psalm
94:2-note
Rise up, O Judge of the earth; Render recompense to the
proud.
Render a reward to the proud, give
them measure for measure, a fair retaliation, blow for blow. The proud
look down upon the gracious poor and strike them from above, as a giant
might hurl down blows upon his adversary; after the same manner, O Lord,
lift up thyself, and "return a recompense upon the proud," and let them
know that thou art far more above them than they can be above the
meanest of their fellow men. The psalmist thus invokes the retribution
of justice in plain speech, and his request is precisely that which
patient innocence puts up in silence, when her looks of anguish appeal
to heaven.
Psalm
101:5-note
Whoever secretly slanders his neighbor, him I will destroy; No one who
has a haughty
look and an arrogant heart will I endure.
Spurgeon:
Proud, domineering, supercilious gentlemen, who look down upon the poor
as though they were so many worms crawling in the earth beneath their
feet, the psalmist could not bear. The sight of them made him suffer,
and therefore he would not suffer them. Great men often affect
aristocratic airs and haughty manners, David therefore resolved that
none should be great in his palace but those who had more grace and more
sense than to indulge in such abominable vanity, Proud men are generally
hard, and therefore very unfit for office; persons of high looks provoke
enmity and discontent, and the fewer of such people about a court the
better for the stability of a throne. If all slanderers were now cut
off, and all the proud banished, it is to be feared that the next census
would declare a very sensible diminution of the population.
Pride will
sit and show itself in the eyes as soon as anywhere. A man is seen what
he is in oculis, in poculis, in loculis (in his eyes, his cups, and his
resorts) say the Rabbins. See Pr 6:17. --John Trapp.
Psalm
119:21-note
Thou dost rebuke the
arrogant, the cursed, Who
wander from Thy commandments.
Spurgeon: Thou hast rebuked
the proud that are cursed. This is one of God's judgments: he is sure to
deal out a terrible portion to men of lofty looks. God rebuked Pharaoh
with sore plagues, and at the Red Sea "In the foundations of the world
were discovered at thy rebuke, O Lord." In the person of the naughty
Egyptian he taught all the proud that he will certainly abase them.
Proud men are cursed men: nobody blesses them, and they soon become a
burden to themselves. In itself, pride is a plague and torment. Even if
no curse came from the law of God, there seems to be a law of nature
that proud men should be unhappy men. This led David to abhor pride; he
dreaded the rebuke of God and the curse of the law. The proud sinners of
his day were his enemies, and he felt happy that God was in the quarrel
as well as he.
Psalm
119:51-note
The arrogant
utterly deride me, Yet I do not turn aside from Thy law.
Spurgeon: The proud have had
me greatly in derision. Proud men never love gracious men, and as they
fear them they veil their fear under a pretended contempt. In this case
their hatred revealed itself in ridicule, and that ridicule was loud and
long. When they wanted sport they made sport of David because he was
God's servant. Men must have strange eyes to be able to see a farce in
faith, and a comedy in holiness; yet it is sadly the case that men who
are short of wit can generally provoke a broad grin by jesting at a
saint. Conceited sinners make footballs of godly men. They call it
roaring fun to caricature a faithful member of "The Holy Club"; his
methods of careful living are the material for their jokes about "the
Methodist"; and his hatred of sin sets their tongues wagging at long
faced Puritanism, and straitlaced hypocrisy. If David was greatly
derided, we may not expect to escape the scorn of the ungodly. There are
hosts of proud men still upon the lace of the earth, and if they find a
believer in affliction they will be mean enough and cruel enough to make
jests at his expense. It is the nature of the son of the bondwoman to
mock the child of the promise.
Psalm
119:69-note
The arrogant
have forged a lie against me; With all my heart I will observe Thy
precepts.
Spurgeon: The proud have
forged a lie against me. They first derided him (Psalms 119:51), then
defrauded him (Psalms 119:61), and now they have defamed him. To injure
his character they resorted to falsehood, for they could find nothing
against him if they spoke the truth. They forged a lie as a blacksmith
beats out a weapon of iron, or they counterfeited the truth as men forge
false coin. The original may suggest a common expression -- "They have
patched up a lie against me." They were not too proud to lie. Pride is a
lie, and when a proud man utters lies "he speaketh of his own." Proud
men are usually the bitterest opponents of the righteous: they are
envious of their good fame and are eager to ruin it. Slander is a cheap
and handy weapon if the object is the destruction of a gracious
reputation; and when many proud ones conspire to concoct, exaggerate,
and spread abroad a malicious falsehood, they generally succeed in
wounding their victim, and it is no fault of theirs if they do not kill
him outright. O the venom which lies under the tongue of a liar! Many a
happy life has been embittered by it, and many a good repute has been
poisoned as with the deadliest drug. It is painful to the last degree to
hear unscrupulous men hammering away at the devil's anvil forging a new
calumny; the only help against it is the sweet promise, "No weapon that
is formed against thee shall prosper, and every tongue that riseth
against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn."
The proud. Faith humbleth, and
infidelity maketh proud. Faith humbleth, because it letteth us see our
sins, and the punishments thereof, and that we have no dealing with God
but through the mediation of Christ; and that we can do no good, nor
avoid evil, but by grace. But when men know not this, then they think
much of themselves, and therefore are proud. Therefore all ignorant men,
all heretics, and worldlings are proud. They that are humbled under
God's hands, are humble to men; but they that despise God do also
persecute his servants. --Richard Greenham.
Psalm
119:78- note
May the arrogant
be ashamed, for they subvert me with a lie; But I shall meditate on Thy
precepts.
Spurgeon: Shame is for the
proud, for it is a shameful thing to be proud. Shame is not for the
holy, for there is nothing in holiness to be ashamed of.
Psalm
119:122-note
Be surety for Thy servant for good; Do not let the
arrogant
oppress me.
Psalm
123:4-note
Our soul is greatly filled With the scoffing of those who are at ease,
And with the contempt of the
proud.
Spurgeon: And with the
contempt of the proud". The proud think so much of themselves that they
must needs think all the less of those who are better than themselves.
Pride is both contemptible and contemptuous. The contempt of the great
ones of the earth is often peculiarly acrid: some of them, like a well
known statesman, are "masters of gibes and flouts and sneers", and never
do they seem so much at home in their acrimony as when a servant of the
Lord is the victim of their venom. It is easy enough to write upon this
subject, but to be selected as the target of contempt is quite another
matter. Great hearts have been broken and brave spirits have been
withered beneath the accursed power of falsehood, and the horrible
blight of contempt. For our comfort we may remember that our divine Lord
was despised and rejected of men, yet he ceased not from his perfect
service till he was exalted to dwell in the heavens. Let us bear our
share of this evil which still rages under the sun, and let us firmly
believe that the contempt of the ungodly shall turn to our honour in the
world to come: even now it serves as a certificate that we are not of
the world, for if we were of the world the world would love us as its
own.
Psalm
140:5-note
The proud
have hidden a trap for me, and cords; They have spread a net by the
wayside; They have set snares for me. Selah.
Isaiah
2:12-note
For the LORD of hosts will have a day of reckoning against everyone who
is proud
and lofty, And against everyone who is lifted up, That he may be abased.
Isaiah
13:11 Thus I will punish the world for its evil, And the wicked for
their iniquity; I will also put an end to the arrogance of the
proud,
And abase the haughtiness of the ruthless.
The story is told of a young Scottish minister who walked proudly into
the pulpit to preach his first sermon. He had a brilliant mind and a
good education and was confident of himself as he faced his first
congregation. But the longer he preached, the more conscious everyone
was that “the Lord was not in the wind.” He finished his message quickly
and came down from the pulpit with his head bowed, his pride now gone.
Afterward, one of the members said to him,
If you had gone into the pulpit the way you came down, you might have
come down from the pulpit the way you went up.
Boastful
(213) (alazon)
is used only one other time in 2 Timothy 3:2 (describing men in the last
days when difficult times come) and refers to the loud arrogant boaster who expresses pride
in oneself or one’s accomplishments and often suggests ostentation and
exaggeration. Plato described this as the person who claimed greatness
that he did not possess. A boaster is the man who seeks to attract
admiration by claiming advantages he does not really possess.
Therefore to a degree every boast is really a lie.
Alazon
in the original designates ostentatious persons in general; but as these
usually affect more than belongs to them, it generally applies to
persons who extend their pretensions to consideration beyond their just
claims.
Barclay
notes that alazon and the related
word alazoneia have...
behind them a most interesting
picture, which makes them all the more vivid and meaningful. The Greeks
derived them from ale, which means a wandering about; and an alazon was
one of these wandering quacks who could be found shouting their wares in
every market-place and in every fair-ground, and offering to sell men
their patent cure-alls.
Plutarch, for instance, uses it to describe a quack doctor (Plutarch,
Moralia 523). It was the word for these quacks and cheapjacks who
travelled the country and set up their stalls wherever crowds gathered,
to sell their patent pills and potions, and to boast that they could
cure anything.
So in Greek the word came to mean a pretentious braggart. The Platonic
Definitions define alazoneia as `the claim to good things which a man
does not really possess'.
Aristotle defines the alazon as the man `who pretends to praiseworthy
qualities which he does not possess, or possesses in a lesser degree
than he makes out' (Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics 1127a 21). Again in
the Rhetoric (1384a 6) he says that 'it is the sign of alazoneia to
claim that things it does not possess belong to it'.
Plato uses the word alazon to describe the 'false and boastful words'
which can get into a young man's mind and drive out `the pursuits and
true words which are the best guardians and sentinels in the minds of
men who are dear to the gods' (Plato, Republic 560c).
In the Gorgias Plato draws a picture of the souls of men before the
judge in the afterworld, souls 'where every act has left its smirch,
where all is awry through falsehood and imposture, alazoneia, and
nothing straight because of a nurture that knew not the truth' (Plato,
Gorgias 525a).
Xenophon tells how Cyrus the Persian king, who knew men, defined the
alazon: 'The name alazon seems to apply to those who pretend that they
are richer than they are, or braver than they are, and to those who
promise to do what they cannot do, and that, too, when it is evident
that they do this only for the sake of getting something or making some
gain' (Xenophon, Cyropaedia 2.2.12).
In the Memorabilia he tells how Socrates utterly condemned such
imposters. Socrates said they are found in every walk of life, but they
were worst of all in politics. 'Much the greatest rogue of all, is the
man who has gulled his city into the belief that he is fit to direct it'
(Xenophon, Memorabilia 1.7.5).
Theophrastus has a famous character sketch of the alazOn. 'Alazoneia',
he begins, 'would seem to be, in fact, pretension to advantages which
one does not possess'. The alatan is the man who will stand in the
market-place and talk to strangers about the argosies he has at sea and
his vast trading enterprises when his bank balance is precisely tenpence
l He will tell of the campaigns he served with Alexander the Great, and
how he was on terms of personal intimacy with him.
He will talk about the letters which the chiefs of the state write to
him for help and advice. When he is living in lodgings he will pretend
that the house in which his room is situated is the family mansion, and
that he is thinking of selling it because it is not commodious enough
for the entertaining which he has to do (Theophrastus, Characters 23).
The alazan was the braggart and the boaster out to impress men; the man
with all his goods in the shop window; the man given to making
extravagant claims which he can never fulfil. But we have still to see
the alazon in his most damaging and dangerous form.
It was not so very dangerous for a man to lay claim to a business or a
fortune which he did not possess; but in the days of the NT there were
men who made claims which were exceedingly dangerous.
These men were the Sophists. The Sophists were Greek wandering teachers
who claimed to sell knowledge; and, in effect, the knowledge they
claimed to sell was the know-ledge of how to be a success in life. The
Greeks loved words; and the Sophists claimed to give men subtle skill in
words, so that, in the famous phrase `they could make the worse appear
the better reason'. They claimed to give men that magic of words which
would make the orator the master of men.
Aristophanes pillories them in The Clouds. He says the whole object of
their teaching was to teach men to fascinate the jury, to win impunity
to cheat, and to find an argument to justify anything. Isocrates, the
great Greek teacher, hated them. `They merely try,' he said, 'to attract
pupils by low fees and big promises' (Isocrates, Sophist 10. 193a).
He said : `They make impossible offers, promising to impart to their
pupils an exact science of conduct by means of which they will always
know what to do. Yet for this science they charge only £15 or £20... .
They try to attract pupils by the specious titles of the subjects which
they claim to teach, such as Justice and Prudence.
`But the Justice and Prudence which they teach are of a very peculiar
sort, and they give a meaning to the words quite different from that
which ordinary people give; in fact they cannot be sure about the
meaning themselves, but can only dispute about it. Although they profess
to teach justice, they refuse to trust their pupils, and make them
deposit the fees with a third party before the course begins' (Isocrates,
Sophist 4. 291d).
Plato savagely attacks them in his book called The Sophist : 'Hunters
after young men of wealth and position, with sham education as their
bait, and a fee for their object, making money by a scientific use of
quibbles in private conversation, while quite aware that what they are
teaching is wrong.'
It is these men, and the like of them, of whom the NT is thinking, and
against whom it warns the Christian. The warning is against the false
teacher who claims to teach men the truth, and who does not know it
himself. The world is still full of these people who offer men a
so-called wisdom, who shout their wares wherever men meet, who claim to
have the cure and the solution to everything. How can we distinguish
these men?
(i) Their characteristic is pride. In
the Testament of Joseph, Joseph tells how he treated his brethren : 'My
land was their land, and their counsel my counsel. And I exalted myself
not among them in arrogance (alazoneia) because of my worldly glory, but
I was among them as one of the least' (Testament of Joseph 17. 8). The
alazon is the teacher who struts as he teaches, and who is fascinated by
his own cleverness.
(ii) Their stock in trade is words. The Sophist defended himself to
Epictetus that the young men came to him looking for someone to teach
them. 'To teach them to live?' demands Epictetus. And then he answers
his own question : 'No, fool; not how to live, but how to talk; which is
also the reason why he admires you' (Epictetus, Discourses 3.23). The
alazon seeks to substitute clever words for fine deeds.
(iii) Their motive is profit. The alazon is out for what he can get.
Prestige for his reputation and money for his pocket is his aim. The
programme he preaches is designed to return his party to power and
himself to office.
The alazon is not dead. There are
still the teachers who offer worldly cleverness instead of heavenly
wisdom; who spin fine words which never end in any lovely action; whose
teaching is aimed at self-advancement and whose desire is profit and
power. (Barclay,
William: New Testament Words:. Westminster John Know Press, 1964)
INVENTORS OF EVIL: epheuretas kakon:
(inventors
Psalms 99:8; 106:39; Ecclesiastes
7:29)
Inventors
(2182)
(epheuretes from epí = intensifies meaning +
heurísko = to find) is found only here in the NT and describes the man who, so to speak, is not content with the
usual, ordinary ways of sinning, but who seeks out new
vices because he has grown blasé and seeks a new thrill in some new sin.
With the proliferation of technology we have seen numerous ways in which
men have become "inventors of evil" and most are so evil they will not
even be mentioned in these notes! How tragic. Men created in God's image
who could be using their minds for noble God glorifying purposes,
instead have been given over to depraved minds that think up unspeakable
evil! Maranatha (Come quickly) Lord Jesus!
Evil (2556)
(kakos) (see related word kakia in note above)
DISOBEDIENT TO
PARENTS: goneusin apeitheis:
(disobedient
Deut 21:18, 19, 20, 21; 27:16; Pr 30:17; Ezekiel
22:7; Mt 16:21; 15:4; Lk 21:16; 2Ti 3:2)
Disobedient
(545) (apeithes from a = without + peítho = persuade) is literally “not to
be persuaded by” or one who refuses to be persuaded.
Parents
(1118)
(goneus from gínomai = to generate) is a parent, whether
father or mother.
Apeithes conveys the idea of
obstinate rejection of the will of God. The corresponding verb (apeitheo)
describes the opposite of "believes" in John 3:36 ""He who
believes (pisteuo - present tense ~ as a lifestyle) in the Son has
eternal life but he who does not obey (present tense ~ as
a lifestyle) the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on
him."
So clearly from this passage in John disobedience
equates with unbelief (cf Heb 3:18, 19
where "disobedient"
clearly parallels "unbelief").
If follows that if one says he believes in Jesus but in
his lifestyle he continually manifests a pattern of disobedience,
he is deceived and is not truly regenerate and a possessor of the Holy
Spirit (as indicated by his unholy disobedient lifestyle) (cf Titus
1:16, 3:3 Lk 1:17 Col 3:6 2Ti 3:2).
(See also Torrey's Topic "Disobedience
to God")
Haldane adds that...
Obedience to parents is here
considered as a duty taught by the light of nature, the breach of which
condemns the heathens, who had not the fifth commandment written in
words. It is a part of the law originally inscribed on the heart, the
traces of which are still to be found in the natural love of children to
their parents. When the heathens, then, disregarded this duty, they
departed from the original constitution of their nature, and disregarded
the voice of God in their hearts. (Haldane, R. An Exposition of Romans)
Barclay
adds that
Both
Jews and Romans set obedience to parents very high in the scale of
virtues. It was one of the Ten Commandments that parents should be
honored. In the early days of the Roman Republic, the patria potestas,
the father’s power, was so absolute that he had the power of life and
death over his family. The reason for including this sin here is that,
once the bonds of the family are loosened, wholesale degeneracy must
necessarily follow. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos) |
|
|
Romans 1:31 without
understanding,
untrustworthy,
unloving,
unmerciful; (NASB:
Lockman) |
|
Greek:
asunetous,
asunthetous,
astorgous,
aneleemonas;
Amplified:
[They were] without understanding, conscienceless and faithless,
heartless and loveless [and] merciless. (Amplified
Bible - Lockman)
Barclay:
senseless breakers of agreements, without natural affections, pitless.
(Westminster
Press)
NLT:
They refuse to understand, break their promises, and are heartless and
unforgiving. (NLT
- Tyndale House)
Phillips:
they mocked at learning, recognized no obligations of honour, lost all
natural affection, and had no use for mercy. (Phillips:
Touchstone)
Wuest:
stupid, faithless, without natural affection, merciless; (Eerdmans)
Young's Literal:
unintelligent, faithless, without natural affection, implacable,
unmerciful; |
|
|
WITHOUT
UNDERSTANDING: asunetous:
(Ro 1:20,21; 3:11; Proverbs 18:2;
Isaiah 27:11; Jeremiah 4:22; Matthew 15:16)
Without understanding
(801)
(asunetos from a = without + sunetós = sagacious, discerning)
describes the man who is a fool, who cannot learn the lesson of
experience, who will not use the mind and brain that God has given to
him. This person is without insight or understanding and is descriptive
of unredeemed man's heart. This man has an inability to bring together
facts and make sense out of them. In context this man has an inability
to conclude from the creation there is a Creator. It is the man who is
without insight into moral or religious things and thus is so blinded
that evil is thought of as good and good as evil.
Asunetos is used 5 times in
the NT (Mt 15:16; Mk
7:18; Ro 1:21, 31; 10:1). Jesus asks His disciples "are you still lacking in
understanding?"
Mt 15:16
(cp
identical use in Mk 7:18);
of men whose "foolish (asunetos) heart was darkened" Ro
1:21
; of "a nation (gentiles) without understanding"
Ro 10:19.
There are 4 uses of asunetos
in the non-apocryphal Septuagint - Deut. 32:21; Job 13:2; Ps. 76:5; 92:6
Haldane adds that without
understanding
well expresses the original; for
although the persons so described were not destitute of understanding as
to the things of this world, but as to these
might be the most intelligent and enlightened, yet, in a moral
sense, or as respects the things of God, they were
unintelligent and stupid. This agrees with the usual signification of
the word, and it perfectly coincides with universal experience. All men
are by nature undiscerning as to the things of God, and to this there
never was an exception. (Haldane, R. An Exposition of Romans) (Bolding
added)
UNTRUSTWORTHY: asunthetous:
(2Ki 18:14-37; Is 33:8; 2Ti 3:3)
Untrustworthy
(KJV "covenant breakers") (802)
(asunthetos from a = not + passive of suntíthemi =
consent, make agreement) describes covenant breakers
or men and women who are “non-covenant-keeping.” Such individuals break promises,
treaties, agreements, and contracts whenever it serves their purposes.
Haldane notes that the KJV
rendering of "Covenant–breakers"...
is a correct translation, if covenant
is understood to apply to every agreement or bargain referring to the
common business of life, as well as solemn all important contracts
between nations and individuals. (Haldane, R. An Exposition of Romans)
Barclay
adds that "asunthetos"
"would come with particular force
to a Roman audience. In the great days of Rome, Roman honesty was a
wonderful thing. A man’s word was as good as his bond. That was in fact
one of the great differences between the Roman and the Greek. The Greek
was a born pilferer. The Greeks used to say that if a governor or
official was entrusted with one talent—£240—even if there were ten
clerks and accountants to check up on him, he was certain to succeed in
embezzling some of it; while the Roman, whether as a magistrate in
office or a general on a campaign, could deal with thousands of talents
on his bare word alone, and never a penny went astray. By using this
word, Paul was recalling the Romans not only to the Christian ethic, but
to their own standards of honour in their greatest days."
(Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
UNLOVING: astorgous:
Unloving
(794)
(astorgos from a = without + storge
= family love) literally means without love for family members.
Storge love is instinctive, involves natural affection and is a
conditional love. Although the Greek word storge is not
used in the NT, it does form part of 3 derivative words in (Ro 1:31, 2Ti
3:3, Ro 12:10). The only other use of astorgos in the NT describes men
in the last days as "unloving" (see note
2 Timothy 3:3 ).
Storge is the word used especially of family love, the love of
child for parent and parent for child. If there is no human affection,
the family cannot exist.
It is a terrible time when men and women are so
focused on
self gratification that even the closest ties mean nothing to them. Perhaps Dickens had this thought in mind in his classic epic "A Tale
of Two Cities" when he wrote "It was the best of times, it was
the worst of times". The "best of times" of course is only
possible when depraved men & women living in the "worst of times"
accept the gospel of Jesus Christ, and are forever transferred from the
city of man to the city of God (cf Rev 21:2-note).
Barclay
notes that the age of the Roman Empire was
an age in which family love was dying. Never was the life
of the child so precarious as at this time. Children were considered a
misfortune. When a child was born, it was taken and laid at the father’s
feet. If the father lifted it up that meant that he acknowledged it. If
he turned away and left it, the child was literally thrown out. There
was never a night when there were not thirty or forty abandoned children
left in the Roman forum. Even Seneca, great soul as he was, could write:
“We kill a mad dog; we slaughter a fierce ox; we plunge the knife into
sickly cattle lest they taint the herb; children who are born weakly and
deformed we drown.” The natural bonds of human affection had been
destroyed. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos)
MacArthur
adds that
astorgos, a negative adjective form of the verb storge,
which commonly was used of family, social, and patriotic love. The noted
theologian Benjamin Warfield described it as "that quiet and abiding
feeling within us, which, resting on an object as near to us, recognizes
that we are closely bound up with it and takes satisfaction in its
recognition." It is not natural for people to love God or the things
and people of God, but it is natural for them to love their own
families. To be astorgos is therefore to be "without natural affection"
(KJV). Just as the self-loving person is without common decency, he also
is without common affection. He cares nothing for the welfare of those
who should be dearest to him. His only interest in them is for what he
believes they can do for him. To be unloving is to be heartless.
Unloving behavior is reported daily in newspapers and broadcasts.
Husbands and wives abusing one another, parents and children abusing one
another - often to the point of murder - are so common that they make
headlines only if they are particularly brutal or sensational.
Tragically, the evangelical church has its share of the unloving and
heartless (Ed note: "heartless" is how the NIV
translates astorgos).
UNMERCIFUL:
aneleemonas:
Unmerciful
(415) (aneleemon from a = without + eleemon = merciful)
is used only here in the NT and means not compassionate. Aneleemon
applies to those who do not feel
for the distresses of others, whatever may be the cause of their
distresses; and to those who inflict these distresses it peculiarly
applies.
Barclay
adds
There never was a time when human
life was so cheap. A slave could be killed or tortured by his master,
for he was only a thing and the law gave his master unlimited power over
him. In a wealthy household a slave was bringing in a tray of crystal
glasses. He stumbled and a glass fell and broke. There and then his
master had him flung into the fish pond in the middle of the courtyard
where the savage lampreys devoured his living flesh. It was an age
pitiless in its very pleasures, for it was the great age of the
gladiatorial games where people found their delight in seeing men kill
each other. It was an age when the quality of mercy was gone. (Barclay,
W: The Daily Study Bible Series, Rev. ed. Philadelphia: The Westminster
Press or
Logos) |
|
|
DOWNLOAD
InstaVerse
for free. It is an easy to
install and simple to use Bible Verse pop up tool that allows you to read
cross references
in context and in the Version you prefer. Only the KJV is free with
this download but you can also download a free copy of
Bible Explorer
which in turn offers
free Bibles
that work with
InstaVerse,
including the excellent, literal translation, the English Standard Version
(ESV). Other popular versions are available for purchase. When you
hold the mouse pointer over a Scripture reference anywhere on the Web (as
well as offline in Word for Windows, email, etc) the passage pops up
immediately.
InstaVerse
can be disabled if the
popups become distractive. This utility really does work and makes it easy
to read the actual passage in context and not just the chapter and verse
reference. |
|