FOR THE
OVERSEER MUST BE ABOVE REPROACH AS GOD'S STEWARD: dei (3SPAI) gar ton episkopon
anegkleton einai (PAN) os theou oikonomon:
(5;
Php 1:1;
3:1
3:2
3:3
3:4
3:5
3:6
3:7
3:8
3:9
3:10
3:11
3:12
3:13)
(M t 24:45;
Lu 12:42;
1Co 4:1,2;
1Pe 4:10)
"for
it is a necessity in the nature of the case that the overseer be such
that no charge can be brought against him as God’s superintendent"
(Wuest)
"it behoveth
the overseer to be blameless"
(Young's Literal)
"must be free from all charge against him"
(Darby)
"An elder has the job of taking care of God's work. So he
must not be guilty of doing wrong." (ICB)
"To
exercise spiritual oversight a man must be of unimpeachable virtue, for
he is God's agent in the affairs of his household"
(Phillips)
"For
since a church leader is in charge of God’s work, he should be without
fault"
(TEV)
The following traits are an easily applied practical list to guide
selection of elders/overseers beginning with a list of "negatives" then
moving on to a list of "positives".
Overseer (1985)
(episkopos from epi = upon + skopos
= distant mark or goal looked at & related word sképtomai
= to look about = source of English "scope") (click
more detailed study) is literally one who
watches upon or over others.
Greeks used episkopos to
describe their pagan gods supposedly watching over worshipers and over
nations. In
Athens epískopoi (plural) were magistrates sent to
outlying cities to organize and govern them.
Episkopos
was used to describe an overseer in any capacity, with examples in
ancient writings describing the official in charge of the repairing of a
temple or an officer in an army. Paul had warned the Ephesian elders to
"be on guard for yourselves and for all the flock, among which the
Holy Spirit has made you overseers (episkopos),
to shepherd the church of God which He purchased with His own blood."
(Acts 20:28).
Paul's addressed the Philippian epistle
"to all the saints in Christ
Jesus who are in Philippi, including the overseers (episkopos)
and deacons" (see note
Philippians 1:1).
As alluded to earlier Paul equates elders with overseers writing to
Timothy to note that
an overseer then must be above reproach (1Ti 3:2).
The last NT use of episkopos describes Jesus as
the Shepherd and Guardian (episkopos)
of your souls. (see note
1 Peter 2:25)
Although the word "overseer" is not used in the following verse, the
writer of Hebrews aptly characterizes the critical role of leaders as
those who "keep watch over your souls" and that they "will
give an account (as all stewards must likewise do to their Master)."
(see note
Hebrews 13:17)
The secular and Biblical
uses of episkopos both emphasize the idea of men charged with exercising watchful care
over others. In the NT the overseer watches over the spiritual life of
the "sheep" in his flock.
"Elder" (presbuteros)
implies the maturity and dignity of the man, while "overseer" (episkopos)
indicates his work as the "overseer" of God's flock. Someone
has summarized elder and overseer with the statement that
elder is the title, oversight is the function.
Must
be (1163)
(dei
from deo = to bind or tie objects together, put in
prison and also root of
doulos, bond-servant) refers to what is not optional but needful (binding) out of intrinsic
necessity or inevitability. Dei refers to inward constraint
which is why it is often translated "must".
Dei describes that which is under the necessity of
happening or which must necessarily take place, often with the
implication of inevitability. Dei To express the sense of
necessity dei is translated "one ought", "one should",
"one has to"
or "one must".
Dei is used 98x in the NT (Matt.
16:21; 17:10; 18:33; 23:23; 24:6; 25:27; 26:35, 54;
Mk. 8:31; 9:11; 13:7, 10, 14; 14:31;
Luke 2:49; 4:43; 9:22; 11:42; 12:12; 13:14, 16,
33; 15:32; 17:25; 18:1; 19:5; 21:9; 22:7, 37; 24:7, 26, 44;
Jn. 3:7, 14, 30; 4:4, 20, 24; 9:4; 10:16; 12:34;
20:9;
Acts 1:16, 21; 3:21; 4:12; 5:29; 9:6, 16; 14:22;
15:5; 16:30; 17:3; 19:21, 36; 20:35; 23:11; 24:19; 25:10, 24; 26:9;
27:21, 24, 26;
Rom. 1:27; 8:26; 12:3;
1Cor 8:2; 11:19; 15:25, 53;
2Cor 2:3; 5:10; 11:30;
Eph. 6:20;
Col. 4:4, 6;
1 Thess. 4:1;
2 Thess. 3:7;
1 Tim. 3:2, 7, 15; 5:13;
2 Tim. 2:6, 24;
Titus 1:7, 11;
Heb. 2:1; 9:26; 11:6;
1 Peter 1:6;
2Pet.
3:11;
Rev. 1:1; 4:1; 10:11; 11:5; 17:10; 20:3; 22:6)
The NASB translates dei as follows: due(1), had(7),
have(2), must(56), necessary(4), needed(1),
ought(17), ought to(1), should(9).
The TDNT comments
that dei
"expresses the character of necessity or compulsion
in an event. The term itself does not denote the authority which imparts
this character. It is thus given its precise significance when conjoined
with this power. In most cases the word bears a weakened sense derived
from everyday processes. It thus denotes that which in a given moment
seems to be necessary or inevitable to a man or group of men...In the
language of philosophy the term expresses logical and scientific
necessities...Ethical or even religious obligations may also be denoted (as used here in Titus 1:7)."
(Kittel,
G., Friedrich, G., & Bromiley, G. W. Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament. Eerdmans)
In regard to overseers the
verb "must"
(dei) expresses the moral fitness (in the 15 or so
characteristics that follow) that is absolutely necessary
in order for one to qualify to lead the local church. In Paul's first
epistle to Timothy, he used dei twice in his description
of qualifications for an overseer, writing that
An overseer, then, must be (dei) above
reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, prudent, respectable,
hospitable, able to teach, 3 not addicted to wine or pugnacious, but
gentle, uncontentious, free from the love of money. 4 He must be one who
manages his own household well, keeping his children under control with
all dignity 5 (but if a man does not know how to manage his own
household, how will he take care of the church of God?); 6 and not a new
convert, lest he become conceited and fall into the condemnation
incurred by the devil. 7 And he must (dei) have a
good reputation with those outside the church, so that he may not fall
into reproach and the snare of the devil.
(1Ti 3:2-7)
In his second epistle Paul emphasized that
"the Lord's bond-servant
(of whom elders, overseers and deacons would surely classify) must (dei) not be
quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged..."
(see note
2 Timothy 2:24)
Paul uses dei once more in Titus in reference to
"rebellious men,
empty talkers and deceivers, especially those of the circumcision, who must (dei) be
silenced because they are upsetting whole families, teaching things they
should not teach, for the sake of sordid gain." (see note
Titus 1:10;
Titus 1:11)
Paul is clearly instructing Titus that it is a
must and not an option that he silence these rebels!
Dei can refer to that
which is divinely destined or decreed as illustrated by the following NT
passages. Jesus declared that “the gospel must (dei) first be preached to all the nations." (Mk
13:10) Before the end of this age (and prior to the 1000 year
reign of Messiah) there must be (because Jesus declared it
so) a worldwide proclamation of the gospel which may refer to the
supernatural proclamation of the gospel (Revelation
14:6 {note};
Revelation Lectures
Pt 2,
Pt 3,
Pt 4;
Resources on Revelation;
Summary Charts of Revelation Chapters
4-22)
at the mid-point of the last 7 year period of Daniel's Seventieth Week
(see
Chart of Daniel's 70th Week;
Daniel
Lectures), just before God pours out His final
wrath on the kingdom of the Anti-christ and rebellious mankind
(referring especially to the "bowl judgments" as described in
Rev 16).
In another use of dei we read
For
as yet they (Jesus' disciples) did not understand the Scripture,
that He must (dei) rise again from the dead. (Jn
20:9).
Peter declared
And there is salvation in no one
else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among
men, by which we must (dei) be saved” (Acts
4:12) (Comment: Referring to the only way of salvation
which is by faith in Jesus Christ)
For salvation one absolutely MUST enter
the small gate and travel the narrow road, for it is the only path that
leads to eternal life.
Finally, one more "must" that applies
to all believers is found in Paul's declaration that
we (only
addressing genuine believers) must (dei) all
appear before the judgment seat of Christ, that each one may be
recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done,
whether good or bad. (2Cor 5:10)
Dei is also used in
Scripture to refer to that which is right as prescribed by law,
duty or custom. For example when the Jewish council (the "Sanhedrin")
rebuked Peter (and the apostles) for teaching in the Name of
Jesus, Peter replied
We
must (dei) obey God rather than men. (Acts
5:29)
The point is that
Christians must obey the government authority but only as long as the
rules or decrees of the government are not contrary to God’s Word. Then
they must obey God. Peter
informs his readers that
In this (the benefits of the
salvation, living hope and future inheritance) you
greatly rejoice, even though now for a little while, if
necessary (dei), you have been distressed by various
trials." (see note
1 Peter 1:6)
The trials of this life are a "must"
for they are God's training ground for our life in the future in
eternity.
The following passage presents an
excellent sense of the "binding" nature of the verb dei
and helps one understand how strong Paul feels about the qualifications
for overseers! As Jesus' time
to be offered as the sacrificial Lamb approached, He
began to show His
disciples that He must go to
Jerusalem, and suffer many things from the elders and chief priests and
scribes, and be killed, and be raised up on the third day"
(Mt 16:21)
Dei emphasizes the inevitableness of the Cross, because it
was for this very
purpose Jesus took the form of man and He was constrained to
fulfill His purpose (cf
Jn 4:34,
17:4).
Dei in fact is often used by
Jesus regarding His work and it's inevitable fulfillment on the Cross of
Calvary. (eg,
Mark 8:31;
Luke 4:43;
9:22;
13:33;
24:7,
26;
John 3:14;
12:34)
In summary, dei means ‘it is necessary’, ‘one must,’ or ‘one ought,’ and is
used (hold pointer over reference in
blue
for representative use)
(a) of a necessity lying in the nature of the case. (Jn 3:30;
note
2 Timothy 2:6) A familiar OT use of
dei in this sense (one of 23 uses in the Septuagint) is Boaz's declaration to
the nearest kinsman redeemer that
On the day you buy the field from the
hand of Naomi, you
must
(dei) also
acquire Ruth the Moabitess, the widow of the deceased, in order to raise
up the name of the deceased on his inheritance." (see note
Ruth 4:5)
(Comment:
The nearest kinsman knew that was a necessity, not an
option, and therefore he gave up his right to Ruth!)
(b) of necessity brought about by circumstances, (John
4:4) and regarding Christ speaking of a necessity brought
about by reason of the Father’s will (Luke
2:49)
(c) of necessity as to what is required that something may be
brought about, (Acts
9:6); In Hebrews we read
And without faith it is impossible to
please Him, for he who comes to God
must
(dei) believe
that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who seek Him."
(see note
Hebrews 11:6)
(d) of a necessity of law, duty, equity, custom (Acts 25:10,
Acts 15:5,
Romans 12:3 {note},
Lu 22:7)
(e) of necessity arising from the sovereign will of
God, (Mt 16:21;
Mt 24:6;
1Cor 15:53) One of the most famous
illustrations is
John record of
The Revelation of
Jesus Christ, which God gave Him (Jesus) to show to His bond-servants, the
things which must shortly take place; and He sent and
communicated it by His angel to His bond-servant John." (see note
Revelation 1:1, see also see
notes
Revelation 4:1,
Revelation 20:6,
Revelation 22:6)
These things must
happen because the sovereign God decreed them to happen.
Note that dei conveys a
slightly different meaning than does the closely related verb opheilo (3784)
which means “to owe, to be a debtor, to be under obligation or bound
by duty”.
Opheilo speaks of a moral
obligation in contrast to a binding necessity as brought out with dei. For example, Paul uses
opheílo
writing to the Romans:
I am under obligation (noun form of opheílo) both to Greeks and to barbarians,
both to the wise and to the foolish." (see note
Romans 1:14)
The apostle saw himself as a debtor to those who
spoke Greek and to those who did not. The word opheilo
refers to a special, personal or moral obligation to do something, in
contrast to the basic meaning of dei, which speaks of a
necessity, something that must be accomplished.
From this overview of dei and
above reproach one can
better understand that the candidate for overseer must possesses these traits
in the following list and if he does not he must not be appointed an overseer.
Spiritual leaders not only must
teach truth but also
must live
out the truth in their life as examples of
godliness to their flock. Damage to the leader’s
reputation is damage to God’s reputation.
In short, the verb dei speaks of what is
necessary, not optional -- once you understand that dei
has no "option clauses", Peter's solemn pronouncement is even more sobering:
Since all these things are to be
destroyed in this way, what sort of people
ought
(dei) you to be in holy
conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day
of God, on account of which the heavens will be destroyed by burning,
and the elements will melt with intense heat!" (see notes
2 Peter 3:11;
2 Peter 3:12)
Peter's exclamation means “How astoundingly
excellent you ought to be!” which is a no nonsense,
straightforward challenge regarding the necessity for Christians to conform their lives to
God’s standards in light of the coming judgment and relative brevity of
this world compared that which is to come.
If you really understand the NT implications of dei, you
will agree that holy conduct and godliness are a necessity not an option!
Above reproach (410)(anegkletos
or anenkletos from a = without, negative particle +
egkaleo/enkaleo {en = in + kaleo = call} = to call in {as a debt or
demand}, to bring to account, to accuse in court, call into account,
bring a charge against - in
Romans 8:33 [note]
"who will bring a charge [egkaleo] against God's elect?..." The
answer "no one") means not arraigned (as in a court), that which
cannot be called to account, unblamable, blameless, irreproachable, free
from accusation or reproach, not accused of having done anything wrong.
Using a modern colloquialism such a
person has "no skeletons in the closet"!
Too often in American churches the
leaders (and elders) are selected because of money, influence or
availability, with little regard to whether they have walked blamelessly
before the Lord. Better to select a leader above reproach than a
popular one!
Anegkletos (see
word study)
signifies that which cannot be called to account. It means having no
blot on one's life for which one could be accused, arraigned, and
disqualified. It means there is nothing laid to one’s
charge (as the result of public investigation). It is not simply an
acquittal but the absence of even a valid accusation.
Philip Towner explained it best (IVP NT Comm.
Series)
blameless (KJV translation) is more a measure of wholeness and
balance than of perfection. The code examines all dimensions of life for
evidence of the Spirit’s influence in each part. This kind of balanced
“reading” means development toward maturity is under way. And Paul felt
that “whole” believers were best suited for church leadership.
Albert Barnes (1798-1870)
says that believers must
live
In holy conduct and piety. That is,
this fact ought to be allowed to exert a deep and abiding influence on
us, to induce us to lead holy lives. We should feel that there is
nothing permanent on the earth that this is not our abiding home; and
that our great interests are in another world. We should be serious,
humble, and prayerful; and should make it our great object to be
prepared for the solemn scenes through which we are soon to pass. An
habitual contemplation of the truth, that all that we see is soon to
pass away, would produce a most salutary effect on the mind. It would
make us serious. It would repress ambition. It would lead us not to
desire to accumulate what must so soon be destroyed. It would prompt us
to lay up our treasures in heaven. It would cause us to ask with deep
earnestness whether we are prepared for these amazing scenes, should
they suddenly burst upon us." (Barnes' Notes on the Bible)
Illustration of a life that was
"above reproach" - The Christian walk of Will Houghton, a preacher
who became the president of Moody Bible Institute during the 1940s,
played a large role in the conversion of an agnostic who was
contemplating suicide. The skeptic was desperate, but he decided
that if he could find a minister who lived his faith he would listen to
him. So he hired a private detective to watch Houghton. When the
investigator’s report came back, it revealed that this preacher’s life
was above reproach; he was for real. The agnostic went to Houghton’s
church, accepted Christ, and later sent his daughter to Moody Bible
Institute.
Steward (3623)
(oikonomos from oíkos = house + némo
= manage, distribute, dispense) (Click
study of related word
oikonomia) is literally the manager or
superintendent of a household or estate.
Oikonomia
is used 10 times in the NT:
4x Lu;
1x Ro;
2x 1Co;
1x Gal;
1x Titus;
1x 1Pe)
Vincent adds that in the Greek culture
the steward
was the one who
assigns to the members of the household their several duties, and pays
to each his wages. The paymaster. He kept the household stores under
lock and seal, giving out what was required; and for this purpose
received a signet-ring from his master."
Although stewards
usually were slaves or freedmen (former slaves), as Vincent notes many
had considerable responsibility and authority. In addition to caring for
all the needs of family members, they could be responsible and
accountable for household finances and for making sure, for example,
that crops were properly planted, cultivated, and harvested. They often
had oversight of all other household servants, to provide for them and
to assign and supervise their work. They would make sure that those who
were sick or wounded were cared for and even dispensed discipline when
necessary.
The overseer as "God's
steward"
does not own the church or the people of the church. But he is in charge
of their spiritual nourishment, growth and behavior. God's steward
must see that the household of God is cared for and looked after and
that their energies and lives are directed to the will of the Master.
The steward must do the will of the Master, carrying out His Word
without any deviation whatsoever.
The
steward
was appointed by (cf
Acts 20:28,
13:2)
and accountable to the owner, the Owner in this verse being God and the
"house" being His "sheep", the local body of believers who probably did
meet in houses rather than formal church structures.
Because the "overseer"
is "God's
steward", he
is directly accountable to Him and thus he must conform to the highest
moral and spiritual standards. Other uses of "steward"
(or "stewardship") give us a good picture of what God expects from the
overseer. Thus, a
steward
must not squander what has been entrusted to him (Lu 16:1
16:2),
in the present context the care of God's "sheep". Paul described
himself, Apollo and Cephas as
servants of Christ and stewards
of the mysteries of God"
and that "moreover it is required of stewards that one be
found trustworthy (dependable,
reliable, faithful)." (1Cor 4:1
4.2)
So one of the most important characteristic of a steward is
faithfulness. (cf
Mt 24:45)
He must use what his master gives him for the good and glory of his
master, and not for himself personally. The idea is that he take
scrupulous care of that which was entrusted to him, and give it out to
others faithfully and as directed by his master Jesus Christ.
And finally in an
exhortation that applies to overseers and to all believers Peter wrote
that
As each one has received a special gift (spiritual
gift), employ it in serving one another, as good stewards
of the manifold grace of God."
(see note
1 Peter 4:10,
cf "stewardship
of God's grace which was given to"
Paul;
see note
Ephesians 3:2).
Wiersbe adds
that
The elder must never say, “This is mine!” All that he has comes from God
(Jn 3:27)
and must be used for God. His time, possessions, ambitions, and talents
are all loaned to him by the Lord; and he must be faithful to use them
to honor God and build the church. Of course, all Christians ought to be
faithful stewards, and not the pastors only! (Wiersbe,
W: Bible Exposition Commentary. 1989. Victor)
Bengel adds that
The greater the master is, the greater the virtues required in His
servant.
NOT
SELF-WILLED: me authade: (Ge 49:6;
2Pe 2:10)
not self-pleased (YLT)
not overbearing (NIV)
not be arrogant (NLT)
not headstrong (Darby)
must not be bossy (CEV)
not pushing himself forward (BBE)
must not be aggressive (Phillips)
must not be obstinately self-willed
(Barclay)
not over-fond of having his own way (Weymouth)
not self-willed or arrogant or presumptuous (Amp)
he must not be presumptuous (Moffatt)
Each of the following
negative traits is preceded by “not” (Gk = me) and should be
considered explanatory of Paul’s fundamental qualification of
“above reproach.”
Self
willed
(829)
(authades
from autós = self + hedomai
= to delight in, take pleasure, English word = "hedonist")
is literally delighting one's self and describes
a man who has a self loving, self seeking spirit, who is so pleased with himself that nothing else pleases
him and he cares to please nobody. He is preoccupation with his own
interests. His is so dominated by self–interest and lack of
consideration of others, that he arrogantly asserts his own will He
is self-satisfied, self-centered, self-complacent, arrogant, proud, haughty,
stubborn, willful, inflexible, presumptuous, unaccommodating, harsh,
despising others, dictatorial, dogmatic, impatient of contradiction, and
unyielding. In his self-loving spirit, he seeks only to gratify self and
is regardless of others. (cf notes
2 Timothy 3:1;
3:2;
3:3;
3:4;
3:5)
Barclay says that authades
literally means
pleasing himself" and "The man who is
authades has been described as the man who is so pleased
with himself that nothing else pleases him and he cares to please
nobody...The Greek ethical writers had much to say about this fault of
authadeia. Aristotle set on the one extreme the man who pleases
everybody (areskos), and on the other extreme the man who pleases nobody
(authades), and between them the man who had in his life a proper
dignity (semnos). He said of the authades that he was the man who
would not converse or associate with any man. Eudemus said that the
authades was the man who “regulates his life with no respect to
others, but who is contemptuous.” Euripides said of him that he was
“harsh to his fellow citizens through want of culture.” Philodemus
said that his character was compounded in equal parts of conceit,
arrogance and contemptuousness. His conceit made him think too